FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked broken

2015-03-07 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. One common problem is

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken

2015-03-07 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. One common problem is

FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2015-03-07 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on th

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2015-03-07 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on th

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked forbidden

2015-03-07 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often, these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known exploits. An overview of each port, inclu

PR 198312

2015-03-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
Can a committer commit the patch attached to this PR so I don't get more pkg-fallout messages? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198312 Thanks! -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail

Re: qemu-devel usage

2015-03-07 Thread Juergen Lock
In article <54f64bbc.4060...@gmail.com> you write: >Yeah! I was able to setup qemu-devel(ver 2.20) to use existing qcow2 >images from linux. Sort of... > >The biggest pain I had was getting networking to play along. No matter >what settings, modules or otherwise I tried, I could not get the VM >

Re: flash does not work: firefox-35.0.1_1,1, nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4

2015-03-07 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
I still haven't fixed it. But I haven't had enough free time to try other options. Anton ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebs

How could I increase "runaway" timer for package build cluster?

2015-03-07 Thread Lev Serebryakov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 One of my ports (devel/gcc-arm-embedded) doesn't produce much output on build (output is redirected to log files), but takes severa hours to be built. Looks like pkg building cluster doesn't like such behavior. Could I notify build cluster (pou

Re: How could I increase "runaway" timer for package build cluster?

2015-03-07 Thread Ben Woods
You can increase the max_execution_time in /usr/local/share/common.sh (default 3600 seconds). There are individual timeout values for extract, install, package and deinstall. These are the maximum values for each stage (with or without output being produced). But more likely, you need to look at t

Single worst bug for ports: lang/gcc* doesn't support c++11

2015-03-07 Thread Yuri
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193528 Many packages still don't build with clang (in part because Linux didn't adopt it as much as FreeBSD did), and at the same time they are changing code to be c++11. As a result, many such packages can't be updated any more. In two days I

Re: Single worst bug for ports: lang/gcc* doesn't support c++11

2015-03-07 Thread Russell L. Carter
On 03/07/15 16:14, Yuri wrote: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193528 Many packages still don't build with clang (in part because Linux didn't adopt it as much as FreeBSD did), and at the same time they are changing code to be c++11. As a result, many such packages can't be u

powerpc64 context, sysutils/polkit fails to build: broken pipe during /usr/local/lib/gobject-introspection/giscanner/sourcescanner.py

2015-03-07 Thread Mark Millard
powerpc64 context (more details are listed later): $ freebsd-version -ku; uname -a 10.1-STABLE 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD FBSDG5S0 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 r279507M: Fri Mar 6 23:08:59 PST 2015 root@FBSDG5S0:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC64vtsc powerpc Ports Revision 380683 via svnlite up

Re: Single worst bug for ports: lang/gcc* doesn't support c++11

2015-03-07 Thread Yuri
On 03/07/2015 21:28, Russell L. Carter wrote: I would like to understand better the problem here, because I use c++11 features heavily with lang/gcc49 on a daily basis with zero problems. No, gcc-4.9.3 fails in the same way. Specific missing feature: std::snprintf error: 'snprintf' is not a m

powerpc64 10.1-STABLE context; cmake's /usr/local/bin/ctest broken but graphics/png configuration defaults use it

2015-03-07 Thread Mark Millard
powerpc64 context (more details are listed much later): $ freebsd-version -ku; uname -a 10.1-STABLE 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD FBSDG5S0 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 r279507M: Fri Mar 6 23:08:59 PST 2015 root@FBSDG5S0:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC64vtsc powerpc Ports Revision 380683 via svnli