Re: Sprinkling WITH_OPENSSL_BASE in ports, ratbox build failure.

2015-01-29 Thread Dewayne Geraghty
On 28/01/2015 6:42 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 2015/01/28 05:57, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: >> ratbox generated an unusual error message today, via portmaster on a >> 10.1Stable, amd64 system >> However commenting out the recently inserted >> WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes >> from the Makefile enables the b

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2015-01-29 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Poudriere in a jail error

2015-01-29 Thread Cassiano Peixoto
Hi, I'm trying to run Poudriere inside a jail to build my packages but i'm having the following error: [00:00:00] >> Creating the reference jail... done [00:00:03] >> Mounting system devices for 10amd64-system [00:00:03] >> Mounting ports/packages/distfiles [00:00:03] >> Using pac

Re: Poudriere in a jail error

2015-01-29 Thread Ben Woods
That looks similar to this bug entry: https://github.com/freebsd/poudriere/issues/216 Does that information help at all? On Friday, January 30, 2015, Cassiano Peixoto wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to run Poudriere inside a jail to build my packages but i'm > having the following error: > > [00:00

Re: Poudriere in a jail error

2015-01-29 Thread Cassiano Peixoto
Hi Ben, I just found out a fix using the url you sent me. I used poudriere -x bulk... to debug the problem. By default a jail doesn't start with loopback interface and poudriere try to build a jail inside a jail using loopback interface. So to fix it i added the following to /etc/jail.conf in ho

testing the value of ${CXX} in ports Makefile

2015-01-29 Thread Don Lewis
I need to test the value of ${CXX} in the Makefile for a port and am getting unexpected results. Here is a simplified version of the Makefile: PORTNAME= junk PORTVERSION=0.0.0 CATEGORIES= devel DISTFILES= MAINTAINER= truck...@freebsd.org COMMENT=junk USE_GCC=4.

Re: testing the value of ${CXX} in ports Makefile

2015-01-29 Thread Elizabeth Myers
On 01/29/15 21:43, Don Lewis wrote: > I need to test the value of ${CXX} in the Makefile for a port and am > getting unexpected results. Here is a simplified version of the > Makefile: > > PORTNAME= junk > PORTVERSION= 0.0.0 > CATEGORIES= devel > DISTFILES= > > MAINTAINER= truck...@freebs

Re: testing the value of ${CXX} in ports Makefile

2015-01-29 Thread Don Lewis
On 29 Jan, Elizabeth Myers wrote: > On 01/29/15 21:43, Don Lewis wrote: >> I need to test the value of ${CXX} in the Makefile for a port and am >> getting unexpected results. Here is a simplified version of the >> Makefile: >> >> PORTNAME=junk >> PORTVERSION= 0.0.0 >> CATEGORIES= devel >> DIS

Re: testing the value of ${CXX} in ports Makefile

2015-01-29 Thread Chris H
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:43:38 -0800 (PST) Don Lewis wrote > I need to test the value of ${CXX} in the Makefile for a port and am > getting unexpected results. Here is a simplified version of the > Makefile: > > PORTNAME=junk > PORTVERSION=0.0.0 > CATEGORIES=devel > DISTFILES= > > MA

Re: testing the value of ${CXX} in ports Makefile

2015-01-29 Thread Don Lewis
On 29 Jan, Chris H wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:43:38 -0800 (PST) Don Lewis > wrote > >> I need to test the value of ${CXX} in the Makefile for a port and am >> getting unexpected results. Here is a simplified version of the >> Makefile: >> >> PORTNAME=junk >> PORTVERSION=0.0.0 >> C

cmake's ctest throws std::length_error during png build, blocking building (powerpc64, 10.1-STABLE)

2015-01-29 Thread Mark Millard
Later below I give how I found the issue. But first I show a short way to reproduce the problem without building a port that uses ctest: root@FBSDG5M1:/usr/home/markmi # ctest --version terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::length_error' what(): vector::reserve Abort (core dumpe