On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:47:39 -0800
"Chris H" wrote:
> There's been a great deal of activity in the squid* department over
> the past couple months. I wanted to wait for the "dust to settle"
> before continuing; lest I be required to re-release every couple
> weeks to work with any new changes. On
In the original thread Jan Beich wrote:
I think the following are relevant patches from bugzilla.
Index: Mk/Uses/scons.mk
===
--- Mk/Uses/scons.mk(revision 376385)
+++ Mk/Uses/scons.mk(working copy)
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ IGNORE=
Admittedly I've only got a math minor, but isn't 1.3.4 > 1.2.13? ;-)
# pkg version -IvL=
tdb-1.2.13,1 > succeeds index (index has 1.3.4)
-scott
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
On 2015-01-16 08:33, R. Scott Evans wrote:
Admittedly I've only got a math minor, but isn't 1.3.4 > 1.2.13? ;-)
# pkg version -IvL=
tdb-1.2.13,1 > succeeds index (index has 1.3.4)
-scott
the ,1 is the PORTEPOCH which apparently was changed because of a
version number
On 01/16/15 09:39, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2015-01-16 08:33, R. Scott Evans wrote:
Admittedly I've only got a math minor, but isn't 1.3.4 > 1.2.13? ;-)
# pkg version -IvL=
tdb-1.2.13,1 > succeeds index (index has 1.3.4)
-scott
the ,1 is the PORTEPOCH which apparentl
On 2015-01-16 16:47, R. Scott Evans wrote:
> On 01/16/15 09:39, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> On 2015-01-16 08:33, R. Scott Evans wrote:
>>> Admittedly I've only got a math minor, but isn't 1.3.4 > 1.2.13? ;-)
>>>
>>> # pkg version -IvL=
>>> tdb-1.2.13,1 > succeeds index (index
On 16.01.2015 06:38, Thomas Mueller wrote:
I've been having trouble with fusefs-ntfs on a Seagate BackupPlus hard drive, 5
TB, external USB 3.0.
It wouldn't mount with ntfs-3g, but I was apparently able to copy (ntfscat) the
files one-by-one, very inelegant and quite unworkable for anything ot
On 01/15/15 09:00, Roger Marquis wrote:
This sounds like you, like many other people have done in the past, have
built an in-house solution based on the tools available at the time,
which includes 'make package'
I wouldn't call it an in-house solution since the package target is a
feature of th
On 16/01/2015 15:51, Patrick Powell wrote:
> On 01/15/15 09:00, Roger Marquis wrote:
>>> This sounds like you, like many other people have done in the past,
>>> have
>>> built an in-house solution based on the tools available at the time,
>>> which includes 'make package'
>>
>> I wouldn't call it a
On 17/01/2015 2:51 AM, Patrick Powell wrote:
> On 01/15/15 09:00, Roger Marquis wrote:
>>> This sounds like you, like many other people have done in the past,
>>> have
>>> built an in-house solution based on the tools available at the time,
>>> which includes 'make package'
>>
>> I wouldn't call i
> from Stefan Ehmann:
> On 16.01.2015 06:38, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > I've been having trouble with fusefs-ntfs on a Seagate BackupPlus hard
> > drive, 5 TB, external USB 3.0.
> > It wouldn't mount with ntfs-3g, but I was apparently able to copy (ntfscat)
> > the files one-by-one, very inelega
I would appreciate advise on the best approach to install openssl that
has been built with gcc48 without needing to install gcc and binutils
into the target machine?
Background
Attempting to run sshd or openssl resulted in
signal 4, illegal instruction.
The target systems are i386 boxes running th
On 16.01.2015 19:17, Thomas Mueller wrote:
from Stefan Ehmann:
On 16.01.2015 06:38, Thomas Mueller wrote:
I've been having trouble with fusefs-ntfs on a Seagate BackupPlus hard drive, 5
TB, external USB 3.0.
It wouldn't mount with ntfs-3g, but I was apparently able to copy (ntfscat) the
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 05:05:48 +1100 Dewayne Geraghty
wrote:
> I would appreciate advise on the best approach to install openssl that
> has been built with gcc48 without needing to install gcc and binutils
> into the target machine?
>
> Background
> Attempting to run sshd or openssl resulted in
>
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:02:22PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:27:14PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I noticed that postgresql93-client port pulls in readline, which is GPLv3.
> >> When I
?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
16 matches
Mail list logo