Re: Difference between fetch(1) and firefox http-access

2014-12-08 Thread Olivier Nicole
Olivier, > Running CURRENT (FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #2 r275512: Fri Dec 5 16:00:34 > CET 2014 amd64), I ran into some kind of obscurity I can not fathom. > > Updating ports fails since a couple of days by now (I do updates on > a daily basis). fetch isn't capable of reaching any(!) server it tries >

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2014-12-08 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: Difference between fetch(1) and firefox http-access

2014-12-08 Thread O. Hartmann
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 16:19:01 +0700 Olivier Nicole wrote: > Olivier, > > > Running CURRENT (FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #2 r275512: Fri Dec 5 > > 16:00:34 CET 2014 amd64), I ran into some kind of obscurity I can > > not fathom. > > > > Updating ports fails since a couple of days by now (I do updates on

2014Q4 security updates?

2014-12-08 Thread George Mitchell
Can we expect security updates at some point to any of these ports on the 2014Q4 branch? firefox-esr-31.2.0,1 flac-1.3.0_2 freetype2-2.5.3_2 libpurple-2.10.9_7 libxul-31.2.0 linux-c6-openssl-1.0.1e nss-3.17.2 pidgin-2.10.9_4 thunderbird-31.2.0 Thanks for your attention.

Abandoning mail/dbmail and mail/gmime

2014-12-08 Thread Alan Hicks
I am abandoning mail/dbmail, mail/dbmail22, mail/gmime2, mail/gmime22 and mail/gmime26. Any takers? They are stable and well maintained upstream with only occasional maintenance releases. Alas I am unable to spend as much as time they deserve. Thanks, Alan _

Re: Abandoning mail/dbmail and mail/gmime

2014-12-08 Thread Muhammad Moinur Rahman
Hi Alan, I would like to take those. BR, Muhammad On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Alan Hicks wrote: > I am abandoning mail/dbmail, mail/dbmail22, mail/gmime2, mail/gmime22 and > mail/gmime26. Any takers? > > They are stable and well maintained upstream with only occasional > maintenance relea

Re: Abandoning mail/dbmail and mail/gmime

2014-12-08 Thread Rodrigo Osorio
Hi guys, Muhammad, can you please open a bug report to request maintenership for those ports ? I'll take the ticket. regards - rodrigo On 08/12/14 20:29 +0600, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote: > Hi Alan, > > I would like to take those. > > BR, > Muhammad > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Alan

Any tool known to demangle special chars in MS tree path names ?

2014-12-08 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi ports@ Is there a utility in ports/ to automatically clean disgusting path names in big trees one acquires from Microsoft users ? Trees with in both directories & filenames, masses of meta characters such as as ' ` . * | \ & space (& accents & high parity bit national extensions eg german umlau

port www/elog

2014-12-08 Thread Chen Xu
Dear ALL, I am using this software with outdated version of FreeBSD. As I can see, this port is DEPRECATED and no longer available. Can any step up to maintain it? Please! -- -Chen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/

Re: Any tool known to demangle special chars in MS tree path names ?

2014-12-08 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Hi ports@ > Is there a utility in ports/ to automatically clean disgusting path > names in big trees one acquires from Microsoft users ? > > Trees with in both directories & filenames, masses of meta characters > such as as ' ` . * | \ & s

Cannot build VTK6 on i386

2014-12-08 Thread Andrea Venturoli
Hello. The box is 9.3/i386. Building math/vtk6 produces: [ 77%] Building CXX object Rendering/FreeType/CMakeFiles/vtkRenderingFreeType.dir/vtkTextRendererStringToImage.cxx.o /usr/ports/math/vtk6/work/VTK-6.1.0/Rendering/FreeType/vtkFreeTypeTools.cxx: In member function 'bool vtkFreeTypeTools

Re: p5- ports not installing

2014-12-08 Thread Xavier Humbert
On 05/12/14 19:03, David Wolfskill wrote: > The following is largely based on ports/UPDATING entry 20141127. I read, and did it, with no success. The reason was that, strangely, portupgrade did *not* rebuild perl before the perlmods... Maybe I did it the wrong way, I'm not really sure. But for m

pkg upgrade candidates not correct

2014-12-08 Thread Michael Jung
I noted that when running 'pkg upgrade' only 50 candidates where detected when I have 1158 ports installed. What am I missing? My local repository 0local is built using poudriere 3.1-RC3 [root@charon ~]# pkg -v 1.4.0.rc3 [root@charon ~]# pkg update -f Updating 0local repository catalogue... Fe

Ports changing permissions on directories

2014-12-08 Thread Andrea Venturoli
Hello. There are some ports that insist on changing permissions on some directories. An example is clamav, which will always change /var/db/clamav mask to 755. Since I always need to "chmod 775 /var/db/clamav" after an upgrade, I'm asking: _ where does this come from? I tried to look into Mak

Re: Ports changing permissions on directories

2014-12-08 Thread Charles Swiger
On Dec 8, 2014, at 11:37 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > There are some ports that insist on changing permissions on some directories. > An example is clamav, which will always change /var/db/clamav mask to 755. > > Since I always need to "chmod 775 /var/db/clamav" after an upgrade, I'm

Re: Ports changing permissions on directories

2014-12-08 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 12/08/14 21:04, Charles Swiger wrote: Since I always need to "chmod 775 /var/db/clamav" after an upgrade, I'm asking: _ where does this come from? I tried to look into Makefile, but didn't get to it; Is the umask setup in your shell 022 or 002? If I run "umask" as root, I get 22, if that

Re: Ports changing permissions on directories

2014-12-08 Thread Charles Swiger
On Dec 8, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 12/08/14 21:04, Charles Swiger wrote: >>> Since I always need to "chmod 775 /var/db/clamav" after an upgrade, I'm >>> asking: >>> _ where does this come from? I tried to look into Makefile, but didn't get >>> to it; >> >> Is the umask se

Re: Ports changing permissions on directories

2014-12-08 Thread olli hauer
On 2014-12-08 20:37, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > There are some ports that insist on changing permissions on some directories. > An example is clamav, which will always change /var/db/clamav mask to 755. > > Since I always need to "chmod 775 /var/db/clamav" after an upgrade, I'm > askin

Re: Ports changing permissions on directories

2014-12-08 Thread Sergei Vyshenski
On 08.12.2014 23:19, Andrea Venturoli wrote: Is there some official doc on the interaction between umask and the port system? Looks like notation of clamav's pkg-plist is outdated. For modern style cf here: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/plist-keywords.htm

Re: Ports changing permissions on directories

2014-12-08 Thread Sergei Vyshenski
On 08.12.2014 23:19, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Is there some official doc on the interaction between umask and the port > system? Sorry for my partly wrong previous message. The notation of clamav's pkg-plist is perfect! Still the following ref gives details: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.IS

Re: Ports changing permissions on directories

2014-12-08 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 12/08/14 21:53, Sergei Vyshenski wrote: On 08.12.2014 23:19, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Is there some official doc on the interaction between umask and the port > system? Sorry for my partly wrong previous message. I didn't get it, BTW :) The notation of clamav's pkg-plist is perfect! S

misc/mc pending bugfix to #194627 and no maintainer to apply it

2014-12-08 Thread Viktor Štujber
There is a broken patch in the misc/mc port named patch-lib__tty__win.c. Its purpose was to be a compatibility fix for a missing feature of freebsd xterm, but in its current form it causes console text to be cleared (scrolled off-screen) when you press ctrl+o to view it. This is a big annoyance

Re: p5- ports not installing

2014-12-08 Thread Mathieu Arnold
+--On 8 décembre 2014 20:21:32 +0100 Xavier Humbert wrote: | On 05/12/14 19:03, David Wolfskill wrote: |> The following is largely based on ports/UPDATING entry 20141127. | | I read, and did it, with no success. | | The reason was that, strangely, portupgrade did *not* rebuild perl | before th

Tomcat7: Unable to stop process (unlike tomcat6)

2014-12-08 Thread Mike Jakubik
Hello, I've Noticed that the rc.d script for tomcat7 has changed from version 6. In tomcat6 a function called tomcat_stop() would force kill after a certain timeout, this no longer happens in tomcat7 and sometimes we are unable to stop it using the rc.d script, it just sits there waiting for

Re: Difference between fetch(1) and firefox http-access

2014-12-08 Thread RW
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:59:54 +0100 O. Hartmann wrote: > Sorry for the noise, many thanks for the quick solution ... For future reference, cross-posting to multiple mailing lists is widely considered to be bad netiquette (unless it's absolutely essential). If you don't get a quick answer, threads

Re: FreeBSD Port: ghostscript9-9.06_8

2014-12-08 Thread Hiroki Sato
Ian Lord wrote in : lo> We have some issues with imageMagick which has a dependencie to this lo> port and I've been told the problem is due to the old version of lo> ghostscript I am using... lo> lo> >From this release history page: lo> >http://www.ghostscript.com/doc/current/History9.htm#Versi