Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
On 1-12-2014 21:45, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
*** [fake-pkg] Error code 74
Stop in /usr/ports/security/p5-IO-Socket-SSL.
A very simple way to solve [fake-pkg] error if you are using svn for
ports synchronization:
cd /usr/ports/security
rm -R p5-IO-Socket-SSL
and start svn to re-sync. The
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 03:51:50PM +0100, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
>
> On 1-12-2014 21:45, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
> > *** [fake-pkg] Error code 74
> > Stop in /usr/ports/security/p5-IO-Socket-SSL.
> A very simple way to solve [fake-pkg] error if you are using svn for
> ports synchronization:
>
On 4-12-2014 16:00, David Wolfskill wrote:
...
Alternatively (as the UPDATING entry indicates):
cd /usr/ports/security
svn revert -R p5-IO-Socket-SSL
Thanks, Dave - I just removed the entire
p5-IO-Socket-SSL folder and resynced with svn. Then running
portmaster -y --clean-distfiles
portma
I have a number of old legacy nanobsd boxes that I want to retrofit with
a couple of packages remotely. Remote full image upgrade is not
something I really want to do, as I would just like to add a couple of
packages. I was looking at poudriere which seems the way to go, but it
seems to only
===> Building for mplayer-1.1.r20140824_5
gmake[1]: Entering directory
'/usr/ports/multimedia/mplayer/work/mplayer-export-2014-08-24'
clang -MMD -MP -D_ISOC99_SOURCE -I. -Iffmpeg -O2 -pipe -DLIBICONV_PLUG -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing
-D_LARGEFILE_
On 12/4/2014 12:11 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> I have a number of old legacy nanobsd boxes that I want to retrofit with
> a couple of packages remotely. Remote full image upgrade is not
> something I really want to do, as I would just like to add a couple of
> packages. I was looking at poudriere wh
Mike Tancsa wrote:
> I have a number of old legacy nanobsd boxes that I want to retrofit
> with a couple of packages remotely. Remote full image upgrade is not
> something I really want to do, as I would just like to add a couple of
> packages. I was looking at poudriere which seems the way to go
On 12/4/2014 7:51 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Poudriere (as of latest 3.1) still supports pkg_install packages. It is
*ports* that does not. You will need to use an older ports tree. You can
use the /branches/pkg_install/ branch, but it is stuck at 2014 Sep.
Excellent! Sept 2014 is fine for what
