Hi all
I have submitted patches for the latest Drupal security
vulnerability on 6 & 7, would a committer be able to take a look at
them? Patches are:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195254
and
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195257
Poudriere build logs are
Fabian Keil wrote:
> Jan Beich wrote:
> > diff --git security/afl/Makefile security/afl/Makefile
> > index e197507..db31853 100644
> > --- security/afl/Makefile
> > +++ security/afl/Makefile
>
> Thanks a lot for the patch, I updated the shar file and will submit it
> tomorrow provided the tarb
Together with the big gnome3 update also audio/pulseaudio was updated.
Unfortunately, after that update, I have no sound anymore. Before, with
PulseAudio 0.9.23, sound was excellent.
Because I am using an ASUS mainboard 'M4A88TD-V EVO-USB3' and a NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 750Ti with a recent HEAD (amd64)
Hi!
> I have submitted patches for the latest Drupal security
> vulnerability on 6 & 7, would a committer be able to take a look at
> them? Patches are:
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195254
> and
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195257
>
> Poudriere b
Hi!
> > I have submitted patches for the latest Drupal security
> > vulnerability on 6 & 7, would a committer be able to take a look at
> > them? Patches are:
> >
> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195254
> > and
> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195257
>
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
And use my gnome-terminal?
I'd better wait.
From /usr/ports/UPDATING "should do"
No.
I used # portmaster x11/gnome3-lite
I had a problem with gnupg
but that was resolved via the ports quik, Thank you!!
Next stop: x11-toolkits/vte3
---
CCLD libvte-2.91.la
GISCAN Vte-2.91.gir
./.li
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183717
Alexander Moisseev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183717
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Moisseev ---
Created attachment 149713
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=149713&action=edit
Patch for comms/hylafax port.
It is actually comms/hylafax bug, not the kernel bug.
The rele
An interesting point came up in one of my ventures - I was trying to set
up a kerberos system with ldap for authentication/authorisation,
therefore using ldap as the backend for the kerberos.
I ran make install clean from ports and set ldap options in the config,
then tried to get it all runni
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183717
--- Comment #2 from ruanchunp...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Alexander Moisseev from comment #1)
> Created attachment 149713 [details]
> Patch for comms/hylafax port.
>
> It is actually comms/hylafax bug, not the kernel bug.
>
> The release
In message <5470aa17.4040...@herveybayaustralia.com.au>, R Skinner writes:
> An interesting point came up in one of my ventures - I was trying to set
> up a kerberos system with ldap for authentication/authorisation,
> therefore using ldap as the backend for the kerberos.
>
> I ran make install
portupgrade -c x264
[Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 1031 packages found - done]
[Gathering depends for multimedia/x264
. done]
---> Upgrading 'x264-0.136.2358_4' to 'x264-0.142.2455' (multimedia/x264)
---> Building '/usr/ports/multimedi
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-8 - please wait..--- describe.accessibility ---
--- describe.arabic ---
--- describe.archivers ---
--- describe.astro ---
--- describe.audio ---
--- describe.benchmarks ---
--- describe.biology ---
--- describe.cad ---
--- describe.chinese ---
--- de
Sorry, forgot to mention, did a portsnap fetch update first and uname -a gives
Box 1
FreeBSD amd.asgard.uk 9.3-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5 #0: Mon Nov 3
22:38:58 UTC 2014 root@amd64-
builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
Box 2
FreeBSD webmaker.asgard.uk 9.3-RELEA
Has anybody given the idea any thought? Though in addition to the
"upstream" MASTER_SITES, there is a (fast) collection of FreeBSD
mirrors, the downloads currently aren't happening in parallel -- they
are serial...
One solution would be for the downloader (fetch(1) or whatever) to try
to open mult
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Mikhail T.
wrote:
> The two examples below strike me as particularly aggressive. Speaking as
> someone working for a web-hosting group in a major company, I can tell
> authoritatively, that -- had we used FreeBSD over there -- we would've
> found having to upgrade
I am well aware that very probably I might be starting a rant thread,
however, I am genuinely interested in opinions from the community.
Since version 24, Emacs, the very good operating system missing only a
decent editor, has developed a package manager for Emacs
extensions. Some good repos exist
On Sunday, 23 November 2014 at 0:32:14 +0100, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote:
> I am well aware that very probably I might be starting a rant thread,
> however, I am genuinely interested in opinions from the community.
>
> Since version 24, Emacs, the very good operating system missing only a
> decent
On 22.11.2014 18:19, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> It's not like FreeBSD has a to of choice when the BerkeleyDB folks
> have dropped db-4.8.
I don't see a connection... People getting their software from Oracle
may have a point to make with the vendor. I'm talking about those, who
install it via FreeBSD
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Mikhail T. wrote:
> Has anybody given the idea any thought? Though in addition to the
> "upstream" MASTER_SITES, there is a (fast) collection of FreeBSD
> mirrors, the downloads currently aren't happening in parallel -- they
> are serial...
>
> One solution would b
22 matches
Mail list logo