Dear committers,
Would someone please commit following 2 PRs?
Bug 191308 - [PATCH] japanese/p5-MeCab: fix LICENSE, strip shared library and
etc.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191308
Bug 191309 - [PATCH] japanese/py-mecab: Update LICENSE, Strip shared library
https://bugs.fre
Hi!
> Would someone please commit following 2 PRs?
>
> Bug 191308 - [PATCH] japanese/p5-MeCab: fix LICENSE, strip shared library and
> etc.
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191308
>
> Bug 191309 - [PATCH] japanese/py-mecab: Update LICENSE, Strip shared library
> https://bugs.
From: Kurt Jaeger
Subject: Re: Please commit 2 PRs
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 10:18:21 +0100
>> Would someone please commit following 2 PRs?
>>
> Done.
Thank you for quick response!
---
Yasuhiro KIMURA
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
I'd like someone to review the attached port for me to commit... It
contains a daemon to run on divert sockets to implement the tcpcrypt
protocol. I have tested this port w/ HEAD and it works fine w/ the
attached patch...
The included patch has been submitted upstream and committed, but a
new re
On 07.11.2014 5:22, Steve Wills wrote:
>> Do you approve the patch attached?
>
> Yeah, that looks fine.
Thanx, committed.
BTW, are you sure that number 101 is right in the
(${ARCH} == "i386" && ${OSVERSION} > 101)
expression? I left it as it was originally, but my 10-stable i386 have
1001
On 08 Nov 2014, at 01:23, Chris H wrote:
> Sorry for the long title. I've been [needlessly] struggling
> with getting ports within the ports tree to build, on a
> fresh 11-CURRENT install from 2014-11-05. With custom
> KERNEL and WORLD built, and installed.
> Here's my situation, which has worked
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Jonathan Chen wrote:
>
> I'm not seeing your errors - but my options differs from yours in that
> I have MOZILLA=off. I'm also running 10/STABLE
I tried changing the MOZILLA option, but no dice. Something is really off here.
Options:
root@kg-core1# make showconfig
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 06:41:40PM -0700, Carol Deihl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just installed ruby21-2.1.3_1,1 with the DEBUG option *unset*,
> and when ruby21 is invoked, it prints out:
>
> WARNING: number of probes fixed does not match the number of defined probes
> (9 != 50, respectively)
> WARN
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 03:35:26PM +, Steve Wills wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 06:41:40PM -0700, Carol Deihl wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I just installed ruby21-2.1.3_1,1 with the DEBUG option *unset*,
> > and when ruby21 is invoked, it prints out:
> >
> > WARNING: number of probes fixed do
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> >
> > I'm not seeing your errors - but my options differs from yours in that
> > I have MOZILLA=off. I'm also running 10/STABLE
>
> I tried changing the MOZILLA option, but no dice.
On 9 November 2014 08:29, Henry Hu wrote:
[...]
>
> This is the problem. Apply this patch:
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> --- Makefile(版本 372086)
> +++ Makefile(工作副本)
> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@
> || ${PORT_OPTIONS:MIMAP} \
>
Hi Steve (and others),
(Didn't reply all previously, and adding more info)
This box is on 10.0-RELEASE-p9 #0 r272290
(and about to get to p12 today or tomorrow).
(Sorry it didn't occur to me to mention that in the original email!)
This is on a production box for us, so it's definitely not CURRENT
On Sat, 8 Nov 2014 14:46:21 +0100 Dimitry Andric wrote
> On 08 Nov 2014, at 01:23, Chris H wrote:
> > Sorry for the long title. I've been [needlessly] struggling
> > with getting ports within the ports tree to build, on a
> > fresh 11-CURRENT install from 2014-11-05. With custom
> > KERNEL and W
Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote:
Hi!
Before updating xf86-video-ati to 7.5.0, we would like some people to
try it out. The reason is that 7.4.0 was crashing for several users, so
we want to be sure it's fixed in 7.5.0.
Here's patch:
https://people
15 matches
Mail list logo