Re: updating x11/xbindkeys for newer Tcl/Tk

2014-11-06 Thread Pietro Cerutti
> On 05 November 2014 at 23:34 Will Parsons wrote: > > When I went to build xbindkeys with Tcl support, I noticed it was > trying to install Tcl8.4, which is quite old. Since I already have > Tcl 8.5 and Tcl 8.6 installed, installing Tcl8.4 seemed to be a waste. > > I edited the Makefile to repl

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-06 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
I've been following this discussion with growing alarm. A similarly elevated tone conversation led to dougb@ (the portmaster author) leaving the project a few years back, when pkg was first introduced. I think the project has lost as a result. As a user, I see and appreciate the initiative and str

How to build dns/bind99 with EDNS0 off by default

2014-11-06 Thread Daniel Morante
Is it possible to build the dig utility with EDNS0 turned off by default? smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: updating x11/xbindkeys for newer Tcl/Tk

2014-11-06 Thread Will Parsons
Pietro Cerutti wrote: >> On 05 November 2014 at 23:34 Will Parsons wrote: >> >> When I went to build xbindkeys with Tcl support, I noticed it was >> trying to install Tcl8.4, which is quite old. Since I already have >> Tcl 8.5 and Tcl 8.6 installed, installing Tcl8.4 seemed to be a waste. >> >>

Re: Can't build ruby20 on -current: it doesn't honor WITHOUT_CDDL=yes

2014-11-06 Thread Steve Wills
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 05:41:31AM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On 30.10.2014 18:15, Steve Wills wrote: > > The checks for OS version weren't meant to detect presence of dtrace, they > > were > > meant to detect presence of dtrace with usable USDT. Unfortunately, > > presence of > > /usr/sbin/d

What is xmmintrin.h, and why aren't ports finding it?

2014-11-06 Thread Chris H
Greetings, Working on a recent 11-CURRENT install (11-CURRENT #1 amd64 r274134 Nov 5 12:56:14 PST 2014) svn info /usr/ports Revision: 372176 Given the above, and the fact that I have installed lang/gcc-48. Is there any reason that any port wanting to include xmmintrin.h fails to find it? Even tho

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-06 Thread Mark Felder
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014, at 03:24, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > I'm not sure what you mean here. > I've systems where I install 99% of packages > from official repo servers, and then rebuild > 1% from ports where the default options are > no good for me. Is this not supported? > Or do you mean some

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-06 Thread Freddie Cash
On Nov 6, 2014 8:26 PM, "Mark Felder" wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014, at 03:24, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > > I'm not sure what you mean here. > > I've systems where I install 99% of packages > > from official repo servers, and then rebuild > > 1% from ports where the default options are >

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-06 Thread Chris H
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 22:26:07 -0600 Mark Felder wrote > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014, at 03:24, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > > I'm not sure what you mean here. > > I've systems where I install 99% of packages > > from official repo servers, and then rebuild > > 1% from ports where the default options a

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-06 Thread Darren Pilgrim
On 11/6/2014 8:35 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: I know there was talk about it in the recent past, but has the "export the svn revision of the ports tree used to build packages" feature been added to the repo metadata? That would eliminate a lot of the issues associated with mixing ports and packages,