Postfix file ownership problem

2014-10-21 Thread Jakob Breivik Grimstveit
Why do I get this error about files with wrong ownership? Tried reinstalling, but it did not help... # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/postfix restart postfix/postfix-script: stopping the Postfix mail system postfix/postfix-script: warning: not owned by group maildrop: /usr/local/sbin/postqueue postfix/postfi

Re: www/dansguardian revival?

2014-10-21 Thread Marko Cupać
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:47:19 -0700 "Chris H" wrote: > Unless theirs any objection. I'll take it. I'll open a pr(1) > with a shar(1) ready, in about an hour. > > --Chris Nice to hear that dansguardian will be back in ports. I also used it for years in combination with www/squid33 without problem

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken

2014-10-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common probl

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked broken

2014-10-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common probl

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2014-10-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on th

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked forbidden

2014-10-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often, these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known exploits. An overview of each port, inclu

FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2014-10-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on th

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2014-10-21 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

from Edward Shriver

2014-10-21 Thread Edward Shriver
How are you? http://conceitoeng.com.br/occasion/afternoon.php Edward Shriver ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

PORTVERSION when there is no upstream version number

2014-10-21 Thread Manuel Wiesinger
Hi, what is the best practice for setting PORTVERSION, when the upstream port has no version number? Is it fine to go with the date like 20141021? I'm trying to port postscreen-stats, which is just a collection of small scripts without any version numbering. See: https://github.com/jv

Re: PORTVERSION when there is no upstream version number

2014-10-21 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 10/21/14 14:45, Manuel Wiesinger wrote: > Hi, > > what is the best practice for setting PORTVERSION, when the upstream > port has no version number? Is it fine to go with the date like 20141021? > Using the date in this sort of case is a pretty good idea, but you should pr

Re: PORTVERSION when there is no upstream version number

2014-10-21 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Manuel Wiesinger wrote: > Hi, > > what is the best practice for setting PORTVERSION, when the upstream port > has no version number? Is it fine to go with the date like 20141021? > > I'm trying to port postscreen-stats, which is jus

Re: PORTVERSION when there is no upstream version number

2014-10-21 Thread Manuel Wiesinger
On 10/21/14 16:37, Scot Hetzel wrote: You can set PORTVERSION to 0.0..mm.dd or 1.0 (if original author is not going to release another version). I've missed exactly that part. Thanks, Manuel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.

compiling non-ports source: how to handle QT3?

2014-10-21 Thread Beeblebrox
I'm trying to compile pdfedit from github (not in ports tree). configure gives this error: ./configure --with-t1-library="${LOCALBASE}/lib" -with-t1-includes="${LOCALBASE}/include" checking for QT qmake... configure: error: unable to find qmake for QT3 I have devel/qt4-qt3support installed on the

Re: compiling non-ports source: how to handle QT3?

2014-10-21 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:40:29 -0700 (PDT) Beeblebrox wrote: > I'm trying to compile pdfedit from github (not in ports tree). > configure gives this error: > ./configure --with-t1-library="${LOCALBASE}/lib" > -with-t1-includes="${LOCALBASE}/include" > checking for QT qmake... configure: error: unab

Re: compiling non-ports source: how to handle QT3?

2014-10-21 Thread Beeblebrox
Hi. > Install devel/qmake? I though it went devel/qt4-qt3support -> devel/qmake4 = qt4 & qt3 functionality. Anyway, after installing devel/qmake, I now get: checking for QT qmake... Using QT3 with qmake=/usr/local/bin/qmake checking for QT lrelease... configure: error: unable to find lrelease lo

Re: compiling non-ports source: how to handle QT3?

2014-10-21 Thread Beeblebrox
OK, I got it that's NLS/localization. - FreeBSD-11-current_amd64_root-on-zfs_RadeonKMS -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/compiling-non-ports-source-how-to-handle-QT3-tp5958500p5958523.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _

firefox-esr 31.2.0,1 is broken

2014-10-21 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
It seems like firefox-esr 31.2.0,1 is broken: tingo@kg-core1$ firefox (process:85057): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion `sys_page_size == 0' failed 1413913937178 addons.manager WARN Application shipped blocklist has an unexpected namespace (http://www.mozilla.org/newlayout/xml/pars

Re: www/dansguardian revival?

2014-10-21 Thread Chris H
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:39:30 +0200 Marko Cupać wrote > On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:47:19 -0700 > "Chris H" wrote: > > > Unless theirs any objection. I'll take it. I'll open a pr(1) > > with a shar(1) ready, in about an hour. > > > > --Chris > > Nice to hear that dansguardian will be back in ports.

libxul is still broken

2014-10-21 Thread sergio de Almeida Lenzi
Hello, Does anybody have an idea how to compile libxul (it is marked broken).. Thanks for any help ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsub

question about option files + graphics/cairo

2014-10-21 Thread Alfred Perlstein
Hey folks, We are building ports via, I tried adding the build of cairo BOTH: make WITHOUT+=X11 OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=X11 however that doesn't seem to work and it's still pulling in X11 it seems: pkg: Missing dependency matching Origin: 'x11/libXext' Version: '1.3.2_2,1' Failed t

Re: libxul is still broken

2014-10-21 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 8:17 PM, sergio de Almeida Lenzi < lenzi.ser...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > > Does anybody have an idea how to compile libxul (it is marked broken).. > > It is noted that it will not compile, so the maintainers are clearly aware of the issue. There has been discussion (n