FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken

2014-08-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common probl

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked broken

2014-08-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common probl

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked forbidden

2014-08-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often, these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known exploits. An overview of each port, inclu

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked forbidden

2014-08-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often, these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known exploits. An overview of each port, inclu

Re: devel/doxygen woes

2014-08-21 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > So I've been getting a lot of issues being directed at me due to the > recent devel/doxygen update to 1.8.7. While I'm not sure why these > issues only cropped up after that update and not before, I would like to > try addressing a few things. Those discussions always pop up if something

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2014-08-21 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: [CFT] SSP Package Repository available

2014-08-21 Thread Mark Martinec
Bryan Drewery wrote: Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently. Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properly respect LDFLAGS. To enable, just add WITH_SSP=yes to your make.conf and re

Re: devel/doxygen woes

2014-08-21 Thread Naram Qashat
On 08/21/14 05:17, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! So I've been getting a lot of issues being directed at me due to the recent devel/doxygen update to 1.8.7. While I'm not sure why these issues only cropped up after that update and not before, I would like to try addressing a few things. Those discuss

Re: [CFT] SSP Package Repository available

2014-08-21 Thread Ronald Klop
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 18:34:22 +0200, Bryan Drewery wrote: On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently. Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports

Re: [CFT] SSP Package Repository available

2014-08-21 Thread Nikolai Lifanov
On 08/20/14 12:34, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 >> i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently. >> >> Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properly >>

www.freebsd.org

2014-08-21 Thread Wimin Yang
Hi, I found your contact over the web and wanted to send you a quick note. With the help of Search Engine Optimization and Web Development, your business can achieve better ranking on prominent search engines like Google, Bing & others to generate more leads/sales. This may look like one of tho

Re: [CFT] SSP Package Repository available

2014-08-21 Thread Mathias Picker
On Mi, 2014-08-20 at 11:34 -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > > Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 > > i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently. > > > > Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once a

Re: [CFT] SSP Package Repository available

2014-08-21 Thread Jerry
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:05:46 +0200, Mathias Picker stated: >On Mi, 2014-08-20 at 11:34 -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> > Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 >> > i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently

Re: [FreeBSD-Ports-Announce] Happy 20th birthday FreeBSD ports tree!

2014-08-21 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Reference: > From: Frederic Culot > Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 07:06:46 +0200 Hi, Frederic Culot wrote: > [1] http://youtu.be/LiFq5D-zmBs There's no sound ! I thought my sound had failed, but as a test there Is sound on adjacent unrelated: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DR

Re: devel/doxygen woes

2014-08-21 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 21.08.2014 um 13:27 schrieb Naram Qashat: > Well, I'd already put in a bug for this: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192732 > > It does mean that, yes, by default, it'll pull in a lot of dependencies. > I'm not sure if having a uses for doxygen really makes much sense, >

Re: [CFT] SSP Package Repository available

2014-08-21 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 8/21/2014 5:34 AM, Mark Martinec wrote: > Bryan Drewery wrote: >> Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 >> i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently. >> >> Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properly >> respect LDFLAGS. >

Re: [CFT] SSP Package Repository available

2014-08-21 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 8/21/2014 6:56 AM, Ronald Klop wrote: > On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 18:34:22 +0200, Bryan Drewery > wrote: > >> On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: >>> Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 >>> i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently. >>> >>> Su

Re: [CFT] SSP Package Repository available

2014-08-21 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 8/21/2014 8:32 AM, Nikolai Lifanov wrote: > On 08/20/14 12:34, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: >>> Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 >>> i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently. >>> >>> Support may be added

Re: [CFT] SSP Package Repository available

2014-08-21 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 8/21/2014 9:31 AM, Jerry wrote: > On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:05:46 +0200, Mathias Picker stated: > >> On Mi, 2014-08-20 at 11:34 -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote: >>> On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 i386 and amd64,

Re: HEADS UP: Pkg 1.3.7 will require rebuilding all packages and manual commands on clients recommended

2014-08-21 Thread Bryan Drewery
To clarify: Only people serving packages for distribution need to rebuild so that their users have fixed packages. If you are running Poudriere/Tinderbox/Custom and are serving packages to other people or machines, you should rebuild them on the build system AFTER 1.3.7 is out. Running pkg check -

Re: [CFT] SSP Package Repository available

2014-08-21 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 8/21/2014 10:53 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 8/21/2014 5:34 AM, Mark Martinec wrote: >> Bryan Drewery wrote: >>> Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 >>> i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently. >>> >>> Support may be added for earlier i386 rel

HEADS UP: Berkeley DB 4...4.7 port removals/upgrades may require manual preparation

2014-08-21 Thread Matthias Andree
Greetings, The time has now come to remove these db4* ports, Berkeley DB versions 4.0 to 4.7, inclusively. Most of their dependent ports can cope with upgrades to db48, db5, or db6, most of the others could be patched to work. I will wait a few hours after this announcement has appeared on the l

databases/mysql-udf-preg

2014-08-21 Thread Dave Hayes
I've been trying to figure out why this port was marked broken then removed. The claim is that there were no public distfiles. However... http://www.goodhumans.com/Misc/lib_mysqludf/lib_mysqludf_preg-LATEST.tar.gz appears to exist and is downloadable. Can someone clarify what is going on? Tha

Re: ImageMagic + Webp

2014-08-21 Thread Jos Chrispijn
Jos Chrispijn: After I installed ImageMagic port, I got stuck at the installation of Webp: Just installed ImageMagic again and the installation went perfect - thanks for your support! BR, Jos Chrispijn ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing l

portupgrade hash error message: HASH: Out of overflow pages. Increase page size

2014-08-21 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! If I run portupgrade -arR -m BATCH=yes I currently get this error on 10.0-amd64: [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 24478 port entries found .1000.2000.3000.4000.5000.6000.7000.8000.9000.1

Re: portupgrade hash error message: HASH: Out of overflow pages. Increase page size

2014-08-21 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 8/21/2014 3:12 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > If I run > > portupgrade -arR -m BATCH=yes > > I currently get this error on 10.0-amd64: > > [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 24478 port > entries found > .1000.2000.3000.4000.5000.60

Re: portupgrade hash error message: HASH: Out of overflow pages. Increase page size

2014-08-21 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > > portupgrade -arR -m BATCH=yes > > > > I currently get this error on 10.0-amd64: > > > > [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 24478 port > > entries found > > .1000.2000.3000.4000.5000.6000.7000.8000.9000.

Re: portupgrade hash error message: HASH: Out of overflow pages. Increase page size

2014-08-21 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 21.08.2014 um 22:36 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > Hi! > >>> portupgrade -arR -m BATCH=yes >>> >>> I currently get this error on 10.0-amd64: >>> >>> [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 24478 port >>> entries found >>> .1000.2000.3000.4000.5000.60

Re: portupgrade hash error message: HASH: Out of overflow pages. Increase page size

2014-08-21 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 8/21/2014 3:36 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >>> portupgrade -arR -m BATCH=yes >>> >>> I currently get this error on 10.0-amd64: >>> >>> [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 24478 port >>> entries found >>> .1000.2000.3000.4000.5000.6000.

[PATCH] x11-fm/mate-file-manager and x11-fm/caja

2014-08-21 Thread Tomasz Sowa
Hi There is a problem in caja with default manual sort order option, I have mentioned it here: http://forums.mate-desktop.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3093 Applying: # cd /usr/ports/x11-fm/caja/files # fetch http://tmp.ttmath.org/patch-src_file-manager_fm-icon-view.c # cd .. # make all reinstall clean

Re: portupgrade hash error message: HASH: Out of overflow pages. Increase page size

2014-08-21 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > What version of ruby do you have? > > Do you have ruby-bdb installed? (May be ruby19-bdb or ruby20-bdb) pkg info | grep ruby ruby-2.1.2,1 Object-oriented interpreted scripting language ruby19-1.9.3.547,1 Object-oriented interpreted scripting language ruby19-b