On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen <
step...@missouri.edu> wrote:
> On 06/08/2014 02:25 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> > On 2014-06-08 10:55 AM, Warren Block wrote:
> >> On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> No. pkg is just a package manager. It does not repla
On 08/06/2014 20:59, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
> Why did the change the database structure? The old way had a separate
> directory for each port/package built. The new way is to use a modern
> relational database. So one advantage is the the new pkg database is
> much faster. Maybe there
Mass-update maintainer from fbsd-po...@opsec.eu -> p...@freebsd.org
-
Build ID: 20140608190600-21045
Job owner: p...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 3 hours
Enddate: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 21:58:38 GMT
The confusing thing for me is this:
>> [01] Saved devel/gobject-introspection wrkdir to:
/build/poudriere_data/wrkdirs/84amd64-default/default/gobject-introspection-1.36.0_2.txz
>> [01] Finished build of devel/gobject-introspection: Failed: configure
>> [01] Skipping build of accessibi
-B/usr/local/bin -pthread -Wl,-soname -Wl,__voronoi__.so -o
dldfcn/.libs/__voronoi__.so
c++: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-pthread'
c++: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-pthread'
sed: /usr/local/lib/liblcms2.la: No such file or directory
libtool: link: `/usr/local
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I upgraded two systems to 8.4 and ran portmaster -ad to update all ports.
Most of it worked fine, but I'm in docbook hell now. I also don't understand
this:
===>>> All >> (6)
===>>> The following actions will be taken if you choose to proceed:
--On June 8, 2014 at 6:38:48 PM -0600 Warren Block
wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I upgraded two systems to 8.4 and ran portmaster -ad to update all ports.
Most of it worked fine, but I'm in docbook hell now. I also don't
understand this:
===>>> All >> (6)
===>>> The foll
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Jim Pazarena wrote:
On 2014-06-08 10:55 AM, Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Jim Pazarena wrote:
No. pkg is just a package manager. It does not replace ports, it just
handles packages. Like the old package manager, binary packages can be
downloaded and installed
On 6/5/2014 6:05 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:09:53 -0500
Paul Schmehl wrote:
That decided it was a good idea to completely break ports to force
people to upgrade? You couldn't come up with a warning system
instead of outright breaking ports? The idiots are apparent
Hello!
You plan a new port?
Release 1.27.0
March 15th, 2014
And the current port is not building on the 10-amd64 stable:
zm_logger.cpp:113:28: error: use of undeclared identifier 'isatty'
if ( fileno(stderr) && isatty(fileno(stderr)) )
^
zm_logger.cpp:445:62: er
Hello, olli.
You wrote 8 июня 2014 г., 1:25:40:
oh> This should be possible if the old pkg tools are no longer supported
oh> (this year Sept.) and code for sub packages is in the tree.
oh> Splitting the package now into several ports is not a preferred way.
oh> Building a full blown subversion tr
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
https://github.com/uli/huc is a more current version, with fixes to
work on 64bit architectures (HuC builds cleanly from ports on a
FreeBSD11-current system I am running on an amd64 arch, but when I
attempt to compile a helloworld.c program following
http://hucdoc.nodtveidt.net/course01.html it th
> None of the above represents what I think FreeBSD ought to be about.
+1
@JM: Being a port maintainer does not give you the right to talk down to
others, much less ridicule anyone. Worse, you feel entitled to address
others in such fashion quite regularly.
You are in need of some serious style
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 00:16:18 +0400 Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Ports.
>
> I've learned proper way to split subversion into several ports. Question
> is: how fine-grained should I do this? I want to split it at least into:
>
> (1) devel/subversion-libs-- base libs, used by all other ports
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 00:16:18 +0400
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Ports.
>
> I've learned proper way to split subversion into several ports. Question
> is: how fine-grained should I do this? I want to split it at least into:
>
> (1) devel/subversion-libs-- base libs, used by all other por
Hello, Tijl.
You wrote 8 июня 2014 г., 14:16:14:
TC> I don't want to stop you from doing this, but if I were you I'd just
TC> wait for subpackages support. You may want to merge all those ports
TC> back into one port then.
It is second way. But I didn't seen any estimations about subpackages
su
Hello, Matthieu.
You wrote 8 июня 2014 г., 15:41:42:
MV> Holy...
MV> Is this Debian now? How about 14 packages to have granularity over what
MV> sub-library needed, and 23 others for each svn* command? And don't forget
headers.
MV> An aspect of ports I liked was it followed/respected the upstre
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 16:27:15 +0400 Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Tijl.
> You wrote 8 июня 2014 г., 14:16:14:
>
> TC> I don't want to stop you from doing this, but if I were you I'd just
> TC> wait for subpackages support. You may want to merge all those ports
> TC> back into one port then.
> I
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 02:41:21PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 16:27:15 +0400 Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> > Hello, Tijl.
> > You wrote 8 июня 2014 г., 14:16:14:
> >
> > TC> I don't want to stop you from doing this, but if I were you I'd just
> > TC> wait for subpackages support.
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Matthieu.
You wrote 8 2014 ?., 15:41:42:
MV> Holy...
MV> Is this Debian now? How about 14 packages to have granularity over what
MV> sub-library needed, and 23 others for each svn* command? And don't forget
headers.
MV> An aspect of port
I just upgraded rkhunter and the installer splatted the sample file over
my .conf file.
Running 'rkhunter --propupd' now quits with the error message
The SCRIPTDIR configuration option has not been set by the installer.
This option is now commented out in the .conf and .conf.sample file.
#
#
--On June 7, 2014 at 11:16:04 PM +0200 olli hauer wrote:
On 2014-06-07 22:40, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On June 7, 2014 at 10:22:41 PM +0200 "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven"
wrote:
Paul Schmehl wrote:
Recently I upgraded two servers to 8.4 and implemented the pkgng
system.
[snip]
Is portmaster not
Hi Paul,
On 08/06/2014 16:20, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I have this in my /etc/make.conf file:
DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes
FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=yes
WITH_PKG=yes
This should read:
WITH_PKGNG=yes
to encourage the use of the new pkg tools.
Thanks,
Daniel.
__
On 6/8/14, 11:20 AM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On June 7, 2014 at 11:16:04 PM +0200 olli hauer wrote:
Do you see which port is looping?
Perhaps a port was moved / renamed / removed and portmaster therfore is
looping around
Sadly I cannot help more since I used all the years tinderbox /
poudri
--On June 8, 2014 at 11:38:37 AM -0400 Kevin Phair
wrote:
On 6/8/14, 11:20 AM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On June 7, 2014 at 11:16:04 PM +0200 olli hauer wrote:
Do you see which port is looping?
Perhaps a port was moved / renamed / removed and portmaster therfore is
looping around
Sadly I c
On 2014-06-08 17:20, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On June 7, 2014 at 11:16:04 PM +0200 olli hauer wrote:
>
>> On 2014-06-07 22:40, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>>> --On June 7, 2014 at 10:22:41 PM +0200 "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven"
>>> wrote:
>>>
Paul Schmehl wrote:
> Recently I upgraded two servers
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Paul Schmehl wrote:
Yes, I do have a few ports with none-default options. The problem is,
they're critical ports (like apache22).
At present, these have to be built from ports. Long-term, there is a
plan to have multiple packages for ports with options.
--On June 8, 2014 at 10:32:33 AM -0600 Warren Block
wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Paul Schmehl wrote:
Yes, I do have a few ports with none-default options. The problem is,
they're critical ports (like apache22).
At present, these have to be built from ports. Long-term, there is a
plan to ha
--On June 8, 2014 at 6:05:35 PM +0200 olli hauer wrote:
On 2014-06-08 17:20, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On June 7, 2014 at 11:16:04 PM +0200 olli hauer wrote:
On 2014-06-07 22:40, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On June 7, 2014 at 10:22:41 PM +0200 "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven"
wrote:
Paul Schmehl wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>
> Thanks, but no, you misunderstand. I just upgraded to servers to 8.4 and
> decided to adopt the new pkgng system at the same time. Any time I upgrade
> the OS, I always rebuild all ports. I've been using portmaster -ad to do
> that for a
--On June 8, 2014 at 7:17:01 PM +0200 Torfinn Ingolfsen
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Paul Schmehl
wrote:
Thanks, but no, you misunderstand. I just upgraded to servers to 8.4 and
decided to adopt the new pkgng system at the same time. Any time I
upgrade the OS, I always rebuild
On 2014-05-28 11:30 AM, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
Hello,
On 5/28/14, 2:13 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
On a new/fresh install, V10, should a person immediately place
"WITH_PKGNG=yes" in the make.conf ? And then is it not required
to run pkg2ng ? Or is it implied? It seems not, but I cannot find
documenta
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Jim Pazarena wrote:
On 2014-05-28 11:30 AM, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
Hello,
On 5/28/14, 2:13 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
On a new/fresh install, V10, should a person immediately place
"WITH_PKGNG=yes" in the make.conf ? And then is it not required
to run pkg2ng ? Or is it implied?
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On June 8, 2014 at 10:32:33 AM -0600 Warren Block
wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Paul Schmehl wrote:
Yes, I do have a few ports with none-default options. The problem is,
they're critical ports (like apache22).
At present, these have to be built fro
I upgraded two systems to 8.4 and ran portmaster -ad to update all ports.
Most of it worked fine, but I'm in docbook hell now. I also don't
understand this:
===>>> All >> (6)
===>>> The following actions will be taken if you choose to proceed:
Upgrade en-freebsd-doc-43251,1 to en-free
Paul Schmehl writes:
> Thanks, but no, you misunderstand. I just upgraded to servers to 8.4
> and decided to adopt the new pkgng system at the same time. Any time
> I upgrade the OS, I always rebuild all ports. I've been using
> portmaster -ad to do that for a while now.
Presumably it's a typ
--On June 8, 2014 at 2:50:53 PM -0400 Lowell Gilbert
wrote:
Paul Schmehl writes:
Thanks, but no, you misunderstand. I just upgraded to servers to 8.4
and decided to adopt the new pkgng system at the same time. Any time
I upgrade the OS, I always rebuild all ports. I've been using
portmas
On 2014-06-08 10:55 AM, Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Jim Pazarena wrote:
No. pkg is just a package manager. It does not replace ports, it just
handles packages. Like the old package manager, binary packages can be
downloaded and installed rather than ports, but the choice is yours
> On 08 Jun 2014, at 21:25, Jim Pazarena wrote:
>
>> On 2014-06-08 10:55 AM, Warren Block wrote:
>> On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Jim Pazarena wrote:
>>
>>
>> No. pkg is just a package manager. It does not replace ports, it just
>> handles packages. Like the old package manager, binary packages can
On 06/08/2014 02:25 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> On 2014-06-08 10:55 AM, Warren Block wrote:
>> On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Jim Pazarena wrote:
>>
>>
>> No. pkg is just a package manager. It does not replace ports, it just
>> handles packages. Like the old package manager, binary packages can be
>> downloa
On 08/06/2014 17:54, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> It seems like a completely unworkable solution to me. For example, say
> you have a port with 10 options. Imagine how many different binaries
> you would have to have to cover every possible combination of selected
> options. It would take a huge amount
[snip snipperdy snip]
Olli, was it really necessary to quote all 236 (!) of those lines?
AvW
--
I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example.
pgpQMWtVlnLfC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Jim Pazarena wrote:
> this process is a little confusing.
> do I still need to run "portsnap fetch" ?
PKGNG is a packaging system, not a building system.
If you need a ports tree (usually for BUILDING ports/packages from source,
although there are other reasons occasionally), then yes, you need
44 matches
Mail list logo
