Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
On my -CURRENT system with 1572 ports installed, I decided to give
pkg-devel (pkg-1.3.0.b2) a try.
Using portmaster, I observe very significant increases in the time
required to check which ports to upgrade. With pkg-devel:
# time portmaster -a
===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports
On May 13, 2014, at 5:04 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 13 May, To: po...@freebsd.org wrote:
>> Please excuse the crosspost. I'm not sure if this is a ports problem or
>> a CURRENT problem.
>>
>> I just updated my 11.0-CURRENT machine to r265940 and can no longer
>> build ports/INDEX-11. My ports
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:38:06PM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote:
> On my -CURRENT system with 1572 ports installed, I decided to give
> pkg-devel (pkg-1.3.0.b2) a try.
>
> Using portmaster, I observe very significant increases in the time
> required to check which ports to upgrade. With pkg-devel:
>
On 11.0-CURRENT, sources r266594, I get this error when tryong to compile port
x11/nvidia-driver:
nvidia_linux.c:42:37: error: incompatible integer to pointer conversion passing
'unsigned
long long' to parameter of type 'cap_rights_t *' (aka 'struct cap_rights *')
[-Werror,-Wint-conversion] if ((
- Stage support
- USES=libtool
- Use new LIB_DEPENDS format
- Create database directory during startup rather than in the package
PR: ports/189769
Submitted by: Krzysztof Stryjek
-
Build ID: 201405231934
Hi,
after updating p5-Net-DNS from version 0.74 to 0.75
postfix-policyd-weight (0.1.15.2) stopped working.
I get the below error on two systems:
May 23 13:31:35 mx postfix/policyd-weight[1037]: child: spawned
May 23 13:31:35 mx postfix/policyd-weight[1037]: warning: child: err: Undefined
subro
On 13/05/2014 4:49 AM, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 12 May 2014, John Marino wrote:
>
>> I commit PR patches that are 6 to 18 months old fairly frequently.
>> There is obviously a huge backlog but many PRs are processed daily. The
>> PRs that aren't getting processed quickly are "[NEW PORT]
Can you please close ports/184033 and ports/189749 as they have been
superseded by Revision 354447.
Alas I forgot to include [patch] in the subject or that I had tested
under poudriere so they understandably got missed.
Thanks for updating them,
Alan
__
