Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
Op 3 mei 2014 05:50 schreef "p90s" :
>
>
[...]
>
> Hi - I have built this on 10, but it will no longer launch, I am seeing
this error:
>
> [jv@yeaguy ~] uname -a
> FreeBSD yeaguy.com 10.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE-p2 #0: Tue Apr 29
17:06:01 UTC 2014
r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/o
Hi Dirk,
How can I enforce it from inside a ports Makefile?
Thanks in advance.
BR,
Muhammad
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Dirk Meyer wrote:
>
> > Is there any way I can force a port to build OPENSSL with RFC3379. The
> > scenario is I am working on a port which requires OPENSSL library wit
Em Sun, 04 May 2014 10:10:46 +0930, Shane Ambler escreveu
> On 04/05/2014 08:45, Shane Ambler wrote:
> > On 03/05/2014 11:16, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote:
> >>
> >> HI. the blender now abort in install stage
>
> >> install -o root -g wheel -m 555
> >> /usr/ports/graphics/blender/work/blenderplayer
portupgrade -p invokes make with DEPENDS_TARGET=package[1] but this no
longer installs dependencies. Which target or option should be used
instead ?
[1] https://github.com/freebsd/portupgrade/issues/58
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
- Pet portlint: rename patch files
-
Build ID: 20140504153200-40941
Job owner: sunp...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 8 minutes
Enddate: Sun, 04 May 2014 15:40:17 GMT
Revision: 352960
For more than 5 years now, the dependency tree surrounding nepomuk
(soprano, redland, raptor, rasqal, etc) has been missing. I can't get
nepomuk-core to compile (freebsd 10.0, ports tree fetched last week)
- it doesn't spot the virtuoso backend of soprano, though I have
recompiled ALL of the requi
HI Marcin,
On Sun, 4 May 2014, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
portupgrade -p invokes make with DEPENDS_TARGET=package[1] but this no
longer installs dependencies. Which target or option should be used
instead ?
I fixed this locally by creating a new target in Mk/bsd.local.mk:
full-package: install
Hi,
emulators/virtualbox-ose-additions always fails for me in the stage
installation, so today I looked a bit further:
Bad:
install -o root -g wheel -m 444
/usr/obj/ports/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-additions/work/VirtualBox-4.3.10/out/freebsd.amd64/release/bin/additions/vboxvideo_drv_.s
Am 04.05.2014 20:44 schrieb "Melvyn Sopacua" :
>
> Hi,
>
> emulators/virtualbox-ose-additions always fails for me in the stage
> installation, so today I looked a bit further:
>
> Bad:
> install -o root -g wheel -m 444
>
/usr/obj/ports/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-additions/work/VirtualBox-4
Hi Bernhard,
On Sun, 4 May 2014, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
Am 04.05.2014 20:44 schrieb "Melvyn Sopacua" :
Hi,
emulators/virtualbox-ose-additions always fails for me in the stage
installation, so today I looked a bit further:
Bad:
install -o root -g wheel -m 444
/usr/obj/ports/usr/ports/em
Hello,
Are there plans for updating devel/openocd to version 0.8.0?
Have a nice day.
--
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freeb
Update to new upstream version 2.1.18.
Bugfixes, DMARC policy support.
New dependency on py-dnspython.
Upstream change log:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-announce/2014-May/000193.html
-
Build ID: 201405042
I am running 10.0-RELEASE-p2 and after the latest ports tree update the
upgrade of astro/kstars to 4.12.4_1 fails:
# portmaster --no-confirm --no-term-title -D -G kstars
Scanning dependencies of target testcsvparser
[100%] Building CXX object
Tests/CMakeFiles/testfwparser.dir/testfwparser.o [100%
Hi,
I just installed chrome inside a jail. It does not display anything. No
matter what it is like settings or configuration or any website. The
same works as expected when chrome runs inside the host system.
The chrome version is Version 33.0.1750.152 (256984).
When I run other applications lik
Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
I just installed chrome inside a jail. It does not display anything. No
matter what it is like settings or configuration or any website. The
same works as expected when chrome runs inside the host system.
The chrome version is Version 33.0.1750.152 (256984).
When I r
Hi,
On Sun, 04 May 2014 21:10:53 -0400
Fbsd8 wrote:
> Erich Dollansky wrote:
> >
> > I just installed chrome inside a jail. It does not display
> > anything. No matter what it is like settings or configuration or
> > any website. The same works as expected when chrome runs inside the
> > host s
17 matches
Mail list logo