http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=188161
Compiling adminutil.c...
cc -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wunused -fPIC -Os -g -fstack-protector -I..
-D_CUPS_SOURCE -I/usr/local/include -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing
-DOPENSSL_DISABLE_OLD_DES_SUPPORT -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_THREAD_SAFE
-D_REENTRA
Am Thu, 03 Apr 2014 20:51:15 +0400
schrieb Boris Samorodov :
> The patch changes three files. So you may restore them all.
> You may use PATCH(1) with -R option to restore status quo.
>
Yeah of course, sorry, did only a quick check of your patch at that
time.
> I use just delete an old package a
04.04.2014 12:07, Anton Shterenlikht пишет:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=188161
>
> Compiling adminutil.c...
> cc -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wunused -fPIC -Os -g -fstack-protector -I..
> -D_CUPS_SOURCE -I/usr/local/include -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing
> -DOPENSSL_DISABLE_OLD_D
On 4/3/2014 4:26 AM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I'm all about automation. I'd like to automate most tasks so I can
> schedule them or write a script with which everything would be done
> automatically.
>
> I have some difficulties with current port options framework:
>
> 1. Is there
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 06:05:13AM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 4/3/2014 4:26 AM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > I'm all about automation. I'd like to automate most tasks so I can
> > schedule them or write a script with which everything would be done
> > automatically.
> >
> >
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 02:18:15PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> 04.04.2014 12:07, Anton Shterenlikht пишет:
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=188161
> >
> > Compiling adminutil.c...
> > cc -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wunused -fPIC -Os -g -fstack-protector -I..
> > -D_CUPS_SOURCE
04.04.2014 15:49, Baptiste Daroussin пишет:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 02:18:15PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>> 04.04.2014 12:07, Anton Shterenlikht пишет:
>>>
>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=188161
>>>
>>> Compiling adminutil.c...
>>> cc -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wunused -fPIC -Os -
Hi,
I've tried to upgrade my python 2.7 which did not work.
Then I deinstalled all python stuff and tried to install python3 (aka 3.3)
The system everytime refuses to install because of missing a database:
pkg-static:
lstat(/home2/usr/ports/lang/python33/work/stage/usr/local/lib/python3.3/lib-dy
04.04.2014 13:51, Dr. Peter Voigt пишет:
> Am Thu, 03 Apr 2014 20:51:15 +0400
> schrieb Boris Samorodov :
>
>> The patch changes three files. So you may restore them all.
>> You may use PATCH(1) with -R option to restore status quo.
>>
> Yeah of course, sorry, did only a quick check of your patch
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 04:08:13PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> 04.04.2014 15:49, Baptiste Daroussin пишет:
> > On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 02:18:15PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> >> 04.04.2014 12:07, Anton Shterenlikht пишет:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=188161
> >>>
>
>From b...@passap.ru Fri Apr 4 11:55:13 2014
>04.04.2014 12:07, Anton Shterenlikht пиÑеÑ:
>>
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=188161
>>
>> Compiling adminutil.c...
>> cc -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wunused -fPIC -Os -g -fstack-protector -I..
>> -D_CUPS_SOURCE -I/usr/local/include
04.04.2014 16:42, Anton Shterenlikht пишет:
>>From b...@passap.ru Fri Apr 4 11:55:13 2014
>> 04.04.2014 12:07, Anton Shterenlikht аПаИбаЕб:
>>>
>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=188161
>>>
>>> Compiling adminutil.c...
>>> cc -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wunused -fPIC -Os -g -fstack-prote
On 4 Apr 2014, at 13:13, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 04:08:13PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>> 04.04.2014 15:49, Baptiste Daroussin пишет:
>>> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 02:18:15PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
04.04.2014 12:07, Anton Shterenlikht пишет:
>
> h
04.04.2014 14:05, Bryan Drewery написав(ла):
On 4/3/2014 4:26 AM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
Hi all.
I'm all about automation. I'd like to automate most tasks so I can
schedule them or write a script with which everything would be done
automatically.
I have some difficulties with current port o
Hi all.
I just fired a PR about that one. I know there should be a maintainer
timeout but domain with maintainers email vanished. All distfiles links
point to this vanished domain too.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=188260
--
Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
On 2014-04-04 09:26, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
04.04.2014 14:05, Bryan Drewery написав(ла):
On 4/3/2014 4:26 AM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
Hi all.
I'm all about automation. I'd like to automate most tasks so I can
schedule them or write a script with which everything would be done
automaticall
(I had to do some copy-pasting to get this email out due to some yahoo smtp
brokeness, sorry for the mess)
On 04/04/2014 07:56, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 4 Apr 2014, at 13:13, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 04:08:13PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>>> 04.04.2014 15:49,
04.04.2014 18:25, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 2014-04-04 09:26, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
04.04.2014 14:05, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 4/3/2014 4:26 AM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
Hi all.
I'm all about automation. I'd like to automate most tasks so I can
schedule them or write a script with which eve
04.04.2014 16:42, Anton Shterenlikht пишет:
>>From b...@passap.ru Fri Apr 4 11:55:13 2014
>> 04.04.2014 12:07, Anton Shterenlikht аПаИбаЕб:
>>>
>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=188161
>>>
>>> Compiling adminutil.c...
>>> cc -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wunused -fPIC -Os -g -fstack-prote
After updating ports today and a lot of the php-stuff, I get this error
restarting
apache24:
httpd: Syntax error on line 162 of /usr/local/etc/apache24/httpd.conf: Cannot
load libexec/apache24/libphp5.so into server: Cannot open
"/usr/local/libexec/apache24/libphp5.so"
I tried to rebuild apache
On Apr 04, 2014 07:28 PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> After updating ports today and a lot of the php-stuff, I get this error
> restarting
> apache24:
>
> httpd: Syntax error on line 162 of /usr/local/etc/apache24/httpd.conf: Cannot
> load libexec/apache24/libphp5.so into server: Cannot open
> "/
Hello,
On 4/4/14, 1:28 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
After updating ports today and a lot of the php-stuff, I get this error
restarting
apache24:
httpd: Syntax error on line 162 of /usr/local/etc/apache24/httpd.conf: Cannot
load libexec/apache24/libphp5.so into server: Cannot open
"/usr/local/libex
Hi all,
I get the following error when running mnemosyne (games/py-mnemosyne):
% mnemosyne
(:0)
An unexpected error has occurred.
Please fo
Hi all,
I get the following error when running mnemosyne (games/py-mnemosyne):
% mnemosyne
(:0)
An unexpected error has occurred.
Please fo
I'm a bit confused so I figured to see if someone can help me understand the
new pkgng system better. Before using it, I have always done a cvs update
(now svn update) to the ports tree and I would do a simple 'pkg_version
-v|grep needs' to see what ports were out-of-date and then portupgrade tho
Using pkg_libchk from Dominic Fandrey's excellent
sysutils/bsdadminscripts port has helped locate ports that needed to be
rebuilt before they became problems.
Now there's pkg check, although I confess to not understanding the man
page. Some options appear to check installed packages, while ot
"sindrome"
> With pkgng I issue a 'pkg update' followed by a 'pkg upgrade' and it
> shows me x number of ports that need to be updated. So it updates
> and completes just fine and of course it's much faster than building
> from source.
>
> So I still keep my source, ports and docs in syn
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, Warren Block wrote:
Using pkg_libchk from Dominic Fandrey's excellent sysutils/bsdadminscripts
port has helped locate ports that needed to be rebuilt before they became
problems.
Now there's pkg check, although I confess to not understanding the man page.
Some options app
It is my understanding it is generally a bad idea to mix the old and
new package systems. (It can be done, but it's beyond my pay grade and if
you're asking this I'd guess it is - at the moment - beyond yours.) "pkgng" can
do almost everything the old system can, and does it better.
-Original Message-
From: sindrome [mailto:sindr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 6:37 PM
To: 'Robert Huff'
Cc: po...@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: pkgng vs. portupgrade reporting ports outdated
It is my understanding it is generally a bad idea to mix the old and
new packag
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:44 PM, sindrome wrote:
> Here's more information
>
> foo:107:/home/foobar# pkg update
> Updating repository catalogue
>
> foo:108:/home/foobar# pkg upgrade
> Updating repository catalogue
> Nothing to do
>
> Now when I do a 'pkg_version -v|grep needs' I have
>
pkg_* tool
Updated my ports tree today, and misc/en-freebsd-doc does not build.
It fails in some invisible way as shown in the attached script on
both 8.4-STABLE and 9.2-STABLE. /etc/make.conf says:
WITH_PKGNG=yes
WITHOUT_CLANG=yes
DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes
WITH_NEW_XORG=yes
-- George
typescript
Descr
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, sindrome wrote:
There is a major inconsistency with what pkg_version -v says is
outdated and what pkgng says.
Of course. pkg_version looks at the text files in /var/db/pkg, while
pkg looks at the database local.sqlite in that directory. The first
step in using pkg is ru
On 04/04/2014 22:42, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've tried to upgrade my python 2.7 which did not work.
> Then I deinstalled all python stuff and tried to install python3 (aka 3.3)
You can install both versions of python (2.7 & 3.3) at the same time,
but currently you can only install a
So now the way to keep ports up-to-date is to execute 'pkg update' and 'pkg
upgrade'?
Are you saying I shouldn't svn update the ports tree anymore?
oz:132:/usr/local/etc# pkg update
oz:133:/usr/local/etc# pkg upgrade
-Original Message-
From: Warren Block [mailto:wbl...@wonkity.com]
Se
Okay so just 'pkg update' followed by 'pkg upgrade' after svn update?
> On Apr 4, 2014, at 11:09 PM, Warren Block wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, sindrome wrote:
>> From: Warren Block [mailto:wbl...@wonkity.com]
>> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 9:23 PM
>> To: sindrome
>> Cc: 'Robert Huff'; po...
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, sindrome wrote:
From: Warren Block [mailto:wbl...@wonkity.com]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 9:23 PM
To: sindrome
Cc: 'Robert Huff'; po...@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: pkgng vs. portupgrade reporting ports outdated
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, sindrome wrote:
There is a major inconsisten
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, Sindrome wrote:
On Apr 4, 2014, at 11:09 PM, Warren Block wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, sindrome wrote:
From: Warren Block [mailto:wbl...@wonkity.com]
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, sindrome wrote:
There is a major inconsistency with what pkg_version -v says is
outdated and what pkgng s
On Fri, 04 Apr 2014 13:32:48 -0400
Jim Ohlstein wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 4/4/14, 1:28 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > After updating ports today and a lot of the php-stuff, I get this error
> > restarting
> > apache24:
> >
> > httpd: Syntax error on line 162 of /usr/local/etc/apache24/httpd.conf:
>
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 13:30:32 -0400
Shawn Webb wrote:
> On Apr 04, 2014 07:28 PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > After updating ports today and a lot of the php-stuff, I get this error
> > restarting
> > apache24:
> >
> > httpd: Syntax error on line 162 of /usr/local/etc/apache24/httpd.conf:
> >
40 matches
Mail list logo