Hello!
FreeBSD's ports are going now to the new "staged and optionNGed world".
Of course, freebsd porters pages have to be updated.
But, I'd like suggest something more easy, for the first glance.
Let's define a couple of ports about which we can say "Yes, this port
is an example of reference impl
setting MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE didn't do it for me. furthermore, i have more
peculiarities to report:
my testing earlier, (where i got the build/package/install to "succeed"
by doing `make clean && make && sleep 1 && make package`) resulted in
quietly installing a borked program. dnscache-conf then
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
How can I list all options currently available in ports tree for
OPTIONS_UNSET /SET
to make a switch to a new syntax?
I have suspicion that there were a lot of duplicates before, hope it's
cleaned up.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/How-do-I-upgrade-from-
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 8:26 AM, buddha wrote:
> cc: error: unknown argument: '-R/usr/local/lib'
>
> Python build finished, but the necessary bits to build these modules were not
> found:
> _bsddb _tkinter dl
> imageoplinuxaudiodev ossaudiodev
> spwd
Joe Nosay writes:
> jack_trauma.c:21:9: warning: 'IP_DONTFRAG' macro redefined
> #define IP_DONTFRAG 1
> ^
> /usr/include/netinet/in.h:464:
> 9: note: previous definition is here
> #define IP_DONTFRAG 67 /* don't fragment packet */
> ^
> jack_trauma.c:192:60: error:
Hi,
I wonder what happend to
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/177413 - it was in
ports tree for a while and now it's gone.
--
best regards,
Lukasz Wasikowski
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li
Hello,
> Hi,
>
> I wonder what happend to
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/177413 - it was in
> ports tree for a while and now it's gone.
according to /usr/ports/MOVED:
www/mod_macro24||2013-08-03|Has expired: part of Apache 2.4.6 and newer
/usr/ports/MOVED is the first place
I'm trying to build shells/ksh93 on FB 10-stable and it fails to build the
work/bin/ksh93 program. The tail of the build log is:
===> Staging for ksh93-20120801_1
===> Generating temporary packing list
install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 /usr/ports/shells/ksh93/work/bin/ksh
/usr/ports/shell
when checking postmaster -L I get:
===>>> pkg-1.2.6
===>>> No /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg exists, and no information
===>>> about ports-mgmt/pkg can be found in /usr/ports/MOVED
and the same for
===>>> cclient-2007f,1
===>>> net-snmp-5.7.2_3
===>>> vim-7.4.182
I know pkg just g
## J. W. Ballantine (j...@hera.homer.att.com):
> I'm trying to build shells/ksh93 on FB 10-stable and it fails to build the
> work/bin/ksh93 program. The tail of the build log is:
i386?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/185256 (patch included).
Regards,
Christoph
--
Spare Spac
> On 27 Feb 2014, at 11:43, "Chad J. Milios" wrote:
>
> setting MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE didn't do it for me. furthermore, i have more
> peculiarities to report:
>
> my testing earlier, (where i got the build/package/install to "succeed" by
> doing `make clean && make && sleep 1 && make package`) re
W dniu 2014-02-27 17:55, Serpent7776 pisze:
>> I wonder what happend to
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/177413 - it was in
>> ports tree for a while and now it's gone.
> according to /usr/ports/MOVED:
>
> www/mod_macro24||2013-08-03|Has expired: part of Apache 2.4.6 and newer
| Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 20:16:42 +0100
| From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder
| To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
| Subject: Re: ksh93 build failure
| Message-ID: <20140227191642.ga3...@elch.exwg.net>
| Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
|
| ## J. W. Ballantine (j...@hera.homer.att.com):
>
On 02/27, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> I stumbled over the same problem today on 10.0, make NO_STAGE=1
> install worked for me on the first attempt though. I can also confirm
> the problem with dnscache-conf when installing the binary package
> using "pkg install".
Can you confirm the exact version you
On 26/02/2014 9:27 AM, John Marino wrote:
> On 2/25/2014 23:08, A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven wrote:
>> Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>
>>> Can we stop advertising the above, this is completly wrong, it hides the
>>> dust behind the carpet and won't fix anything!
>>>
>>> The said port is needed a fix.
>> Gr
I am not at all clear how to perform a migration of machines that
run authoritative nameservers from FreeBSD 9.x -> 10.x, given the
current setup of the dns/bind99 port. I'm hoping for some clues,
if not insight.
I have been building & running both stable/9 & stable/10 (on different
slices) for s
# portmaster mail/postfix210
[...]
===>>> Gathering dependency list for mail/postfix210 from ports
===>>> Launching child to install databases/db41
===>>> postfix210-2.10.3,1 >> databases/db41 (1/1)
Why?
postfix certainly does *not* require db41, and make.conf is set for version 5.3
# cat /et
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:26:34 +0300
> "Sergey V. Dyatko" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I use sysutils/bsdadminscripts for years, thanks Dominic. After
> > switching to pkg[ng] I patch pkg_libchk for it ( pkg info with
> > corresponding keys i
LuKreme writes:
> # portmaster mail/postfix210
> [...]
> ===>>> Gathering dependency list for mail/postfix210 from ports
> ===>>> Launching child to install databases/db41
>
> ===>>> postfix210-2.10.3,1 >> databases/db41 (1/1)
>
> Why?
>
> postfix certainly does *not* require db41, and make.conf
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
LuKreme writes:
# portmaster mail/postfix210
[...]
===>>> Gathering dependency list for mail/postfix210 from ports
===>>> Launching child to install databases/db41
===>>> postfix210-2.10.3,1 >> databases/db41 (1/1)
Why?
postfix certainly does *no
What's the proper use for:
WITH_$PORT_VER=
DEFAULT_$PORT_VER=
$PORT_PORT=
Example:
WITH_BDB_VER=5
DEFAULT_PGSQL_VER=93
APACHE_PORT=www/apache24
Are they essentially interchangeable and achieve the same result?
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>LuKreme writes:
>
>> # portmaster mail/postfix210
>> [
Hi there,
in message ,
wrote Chris H thusly...
>
> > I am the current maintainer of databases/p5-DBIx-Simple port (last
> > updated on CPAN is 1.35 in 2011).
> >
> > Are there any user of the port? Have there been problems otherwise?
> > (If it is not obvious, I am not an user.)
> >
> > While here
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:17:54 -0800
Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Sergey V. Dyatko
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:26:34 +0300
> > "Sergey V. Dyatko" wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I use sysutils/bsdadminscripts for years, thanks Dominic. After
> > > switchin
Hi, Chris!
> > > I am the current maintainer of databases/p5-DBIx-Simple port (last
> > > updated on CPAN is 1.35 in 2011).
> > >
> > > Are there any user of the port? Have there been problems otherwise?
> > > (If it is not obvious, I am not an user.)
> > >
> > > While here, would anybody want to
В Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:32:18 +0300
"Sergey V. Dyatko" пишет:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:26:34 +0300
> "Sergey V. Dyatko" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I use sysutils/bsdadminscripts for years, thanks Dominic. After
> > switching to pkg[ng] I patch pkg_libchk for it ( pkg info with
> > corresponding k
Hello,
I am using slrn and vim to post messages on Usenet.
Vim is running with the UTF-8 encoding set.
To avoid posting messages in UTF-8 when it is not needed, the following
rules is defined in the slrn resource file:
charset outgoing "us-ascii,iso-8859-1,iso-8859-15,utf-8"
This means that
27 matches
Mail list logo
