As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports
that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often,
this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or
the cessation of development on th
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports
that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
build environments. The most common probl
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports
that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
build environments. The most common probl
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports
that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often,
this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or
the cessation of development on th
Hi,
I have constant skips in both video and audio when playing 1080p mkv
files in latest vlc-2.1.2,4 on 8.4-STABLE #0 r259547. When started from
console I see the following errors:
[0x801442150] main libvlc: Running vlc with the default interface. Use
'cvlc' to use vlc without interface.
No acce
> At the beginning of the thread, I used the gcc developer list as an
> actual example. If anyone posst an inappropriate topic to the list, it
> may get answered, but it will always get a "this is not appropriate for
> this list, please don't do it again, use the list for this next
> time."
John Marino wrote:
> Over the months I've seen several ports users copy a failure log and
> mail it to ports@, usually without even saying "hello". I've tried to
> discourage that behavior but other members of this mail list encourage
> this method of bypassing writing PRs. One user even proudly
Howdy all,
I happened to notice that there are already several misc/fortune* ports
and it takes only the slightest bit of imagination to come up with several
more. Hell, I alone can think of at least a dozen or so. However, we
probably don't want to fill the ports tree with a whole bunch of ports
Hi,
I wanted to install Lightning from ports for use with Thunderbird but it
appears there no longer is a port for this software. Is this the case;
and if so, will there be at some point in the near future?
Failing that, is anyone else aware of Calendar software similar to
Lightning that wor
On 21/12/2013 14:49, James Griffin wrote:
> I wanted to install Lightning from ports for use with Thunderbird but it
> appears there no longer is a port for this software. Is this the case;
> and if so, will there be at some point in the near future?
>
It's included by default with mail/thunderbi
On 12/21/2013 15:02, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 21/12/2013 14:49, James Griffin wrote:
I wanted to install Lightning from ports for use with Thunderbird but it
appears there no longer is a port for this software. Is this the case;
and if so, will there be at some point in the near future?
It's
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Royce Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 07:27:05AM -0900, Royce Williams wrote:
>> > Could someone bump security/john? The simple patch below should be a
>> > good
>> > start to cover it, and
Hi,
On Sat, 21 Dec 2013 15:27:10 +0100
"A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" wrote:
> I happened to notice that there are already several misc/fortune*
> ports and it takes only the slightest bit of imagination to come up
> with several more. Hell, I alone can think of at least a dozen or so.
> However, we p
"A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" writes:
> I happened to notice that there are already several misc/fortune* ports
> and it takes only the slightest bit of imagination to come up with several
> more. Hell, I alone can think of at least a dozen or so. However, we
> probably don't want to fill the ports tr
Erich Dollansky wrote:
> this is a good idea.
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> That would be a fine idea,
Thank you both for the feedback.
> as long as it doesn't raise any license problems. We don't actually
> consider or track licenses on any fortune files or ports. I don't think
> that's a problem
On 21/12/2013 14:27, A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven wrote:
> Would it be a good idea to merge all fortune* ports into one and use the
> OPTIONS framework to let the user select which cookie jar(s) they wish to
> install?
This will make it impossible for people that use binary packages to
choose which fort
Hi. Would it be possible to get the security/tor port updated to the latest
stable? It fixes a lot of important problems that we needed to use -devel for
before.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
Hi List,
A few weeks ago, I submitted a patch to build security/krb5 with LDAP
support (adding a dependency on security/openldap24-sasl-client). All
was well.
Now, I've realized that security/cyrus-sasl2 (which the OpenLDAP client
depends on) is going to need a knob to control which Kerberos
Latest zsh fails "unexpectedly":
> configure: error: "No terminal handling library was found on your
> system. This is probably a library called 'curses' or 'ncurses'."
Well, ncurses is - and always was - installed. The script suggests me
to install ncurses-devel instead which conflicts with ncur
19 matches
Mail list logo
