Andrey Fesenko wrote
in :
f0> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:10 AM, hiren panchasara
f0> wrote:
f0> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Andrey Fesenko wrote:
f0> >
f0> >> security/trousers - need add user in comand line and remove path var
f0> >> directory pkg-plist
f0> > hrs@ just fixed this port a
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Andrey Fesenko wrote
> in :
>
> f0> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:10 AM, hiren panchasara
> f0> wrote:
> f0> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Andrey Fesenko
> wrote:
> f0> >
> f0> >> security/trousers - need add user in comand line and remove
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
Hi,
Let us suppose I am porting an application which depends on Openssl. But
not only OpenSSL, OpenSSL has to have some options enabled which are not
enabled by default. How can I force changing the knob?
Slave port is an option I have thought. But anything else? Thanks in
advance.
Regards,
Muha
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 05:42:15PM +0600, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Let us suppose I am porting an application which depends on Openssl. But
> not only OpenSSL, OpenSSL has to have some options enabled which are not
> enabled by default. How can I force changing the knob?
>
> Slave
Hi Bapte,
RFC3779.
BR,
Muhammad
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 05:42:15PM +0600, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Let us suppose I am porting an application which depends on Openssl. But
> > not only OpenSSL, OpenSSL has to hav
> > So could I run "make fetchindex" from NetBSD even if I don't attempt to
> > actually build ports from NetBSD?
> > I would have to point the MAKECONF to FreeBSD's /etc/make.conf rather than
> > use NetBSD's /etc/mk.conf which is specific to NetBSD.
> > Or is it safe to skip "make fetchindex"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/04/2013 17:38, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
> PS. @Mark: cvCreateImageHeader, symbol, which test program tries to
> find in opencv-core.so library, exists there and exported indeed.
> It absent in the output of plain nm (or 'nm -a' in your case) just
Hello,
I'm trying to build openjdk6-b28_6 and get the following failure.
I tried both with and without MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes. The extract below is with.
build-classes-javac:
[mkdir] Created dir:
/usr/ports/java/openjdk6/work/build/bsd-amd64/langtools/build/gensrc
[mkdir] Created
I noticed that output of 'pkg info' changed after version 1.2.
If I remember correctly, 1.1.x behaved as following:
- 'pkg info -q pkg-name' outputs package name with version.
- 'pkg info pkg-name' outputs package name with version, and comment.
- 'pkg info -f pkg-name' outputs full information.
Sorry to follow up on my own post, but I tried removing openjdk6-b28_5 first and
the build for openjdk6-b28_6 succeeded.
--
Richard Kuhns Direct: 765-269-8541
Wintek Corporation Internet Support: 765-269-8503
427 N 6th Street Consulting: 765-2
Hello,
I'm having some trouble creating packages for some perl ports. They seem to
be confused about where to place files. For example, p5-libwww:
===> Generating temporary packing list
Installing
/var/ports/usr/ports/www/p5-libwww/work/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.12.4/LWP.pm
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:13:38 +0900 (JST)
Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
> I noticed that output of 'pkg info' changed after version 1.2.
>
> If I remember correctly, 1.1.x behaved as following:
>
> - 'pkg info -q pkg-name' outputs package name with version.
> - 'pkg info pkg-name' outputs package name
Did you follow:
20130612:
AFFECTS: users of lang/perl* and any port that depends on it
AUTHOR: a...@freebsd.org
lang/perl5.12 has been upgraded from version 5.12.4 to 5.12.5
lang/perl5.14 has been upgraded from version 5.14.2 to 5.14.4
lang/perl5.16 has been upgraded from version 5.16.2
Ah, that's almost certainly it. When I searched through UPDATING I was too
focused on the specific ports. Thanks!
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:44 AM, William Grzybowski wrote:
> Did you follow:
>
> 20130612:
> AFFECTS: users of lang/perl* and any port that depends on it
> AUTHOR: a...@freebsd.o
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:36:00PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:13:38 +0900 (JST)
> Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
>
> > I noticed that output of 'pkg info' changed after version 1.2.
> >
> > If I remember correctly, 1.1.x behaved as following:
> >
> > - 'pkg info -q pkg-name'
From: Baptiste Daroussin
Subject: Re: Output change of 'pkg info' after 1.2.
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 17:24:09 +0100
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:36:00PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>> On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:13:38 +0900 (JST)
>> Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
>>
>> > I noticed that output of 'pkg info' c
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 10:34:27PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> We discussed this topic about half a year ago, but came to no
> conclusion. I CCed everyone who participated in the discussion back
> then.
>
> Since 10-RELEASE is around the corner and I'm trying to get devel/ice
> working on it, o
OpenMPI fails to install under FreeBSD-10 BETA4. It previously installed
under BETA3. The key difference appears to be version _1 vs _2. Data
follows.
The system:
Coke# uname -a
FreeBSD Coke 10.0-BETA4 FreeBSD 10.0-BETA4 #1 r258932: Wed Dec 4 14:57:28
PST 2013 root@Coke:/usr/obj/usr/sr
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 19:07:28 +0200
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> If you provided link to the original discussion, it would take much
> less energy and time to refresh the memory.
Forgot to include it, sorry. Thanks for you response and the patch.
>
> I looked over this, and I think that r211706
On 12/05/13 15:17, Dennis Glatting wrote:
>
> OpenMPI fails to install under FreeBSD-10 BETA4. It previously
> installed under BETA3. The key difference appears to be version _1 vs
> _2. Data follows.
>
> The system:
>
> Coke# uname -a
> FreeBSD Coke 10.0-BETA4 FreeBSD 10.0-BETA4 #1 r258932: Wed De
On 12/05/13 16:00, Dennis Glatting wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2013, Danilo E. Gondolfo wrote:
>
>> On 12/05/13 15:17, Dennis Glatting wrote:
>>>
>>> OpenMPI fails to install under FreeBSD-10 BETA4. It previously
>>> installed under BETA3. The key difference appears to be version _1 vs
>>> _2. Da
A short recap for those of you who are subscribed to freebsd-ports@ but
not freebsd-stable@: when I opened my inbox this morning I found a typical
WTF thread: the (hardly) "offensive" fortune cookies have been kicked out
of 10-BETA4. Since I (and many others) find this Just Plain Stupid (tm) I
crea
I'm in the process of changing ports from ports iconv to iconv in base.
I noticed that transliteration doesn't work in base as it does with
iconv from ports. Examples:
"T\xc5\xbdst"
ports: "TZst"
base: "Tst"
"T\xe2\x82\xacst"
ports: "TEURst"
base: "Tst"
Conversion done using:
iconv_open("ISO8859
On 2013.12.05 15:54, A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven wrote:
> A short recap for those of you who are subscribed to freebsd-ports@ but
> not freebsd-stable@: when I opened my inbox this morning I found a typical
> WTF thread: the (hardly) "offensive" fortune cookies have been kicked out
> of 10-BETA4. Since
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 18:20:58 +0100
Michael Gmelin wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 19:07:28 +0200
> Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> > If you provided link to the original discussion, it would take much
> > less energy and time to refresh the memory.
>
> Forgot to include it, sorry. Thanks for you r
On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 00:15:54 +0100
Michael Gmelin wrote:
> I'm in the process of changing ports from ports iconv to iconv in
> base. I noticed that transliteration doesn't work in base as it does
> with iconv from ports. Examples:
>
> "T\xc5\xbdst"
> ports: "TZst"
> base: "Tst"
>
> "T\xe2\x82\xa
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 03:25:52AM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> I tested your patch on 10-BETA2 and 10-BETA3. I built our complete
> production environment from scratch, ran a huge number of unit and
> integration tests. Everything works as expected, including Ice's
> "Schwarz Counter" implementa
Hi,
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 22:54:37 +0100
"A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" wrote:
> A short recap for those of you who are subscribed to freebsd-ports@
> but not freebsd-stable@: when I opened my inbox this morning I found
> a typical WTF thread: the (hardly) "offensive" fortune cookies have
> been kicked o
Am 2013-12-05 17:54, schrieb Yasuhiro KIMURA:
From: Baptiste Daroussin
Subject: Re: Output change of 'pkg info' after 1.2.
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 17:24:09 +0100
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:36:00PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote:
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:13:38 +0900 (JST)
Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
> I
30 matches
Mail list logo
