On Saturday, 23 November 2013 03:00:54 Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2013, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > This should be a definitive fix:
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/fix-info-subdir.diff
> >
> > Btw that have shown a bug in pkg 1.2.0 rc1 and prior (not in 1.1.x) I
> > have fix in
What do I need to do, to get ghostscript's opvp support to work?
GS works fine displaying to the screen, but when I specify
-sDEVICE=opvp I get
Unable to open the initial device, quitting.
If I also specify -dINITDEBUG=1 to turn on debug output during
gs_init.ps, I get a lot of messages s
- Update to 0.10.3 stable release
-
Build ID: 20131124081411-18325
Job owner: flu...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 47 minutes
Enddate: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 09:01:06 GMT
Revision: r334709
- Update devel/ruby-gems to 1.8.28
- Document security issues with 1.8.26 and 1.8.27 (CVE-2013-4287 and
CVE-2013-4363)
Security: 742eb9e4-e3cb-4f5a-b94e-0e9a39420600
Security: 54237182-9635-4a8b-92d7-33bfaeed84cd
-
Hi,
Is there any change someone could look at ports/172547?
Without overriding REALPATH I’m unable to install ports into an alternative
root path.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=172547
thanks
Rob
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing lis
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> Thanks to Gerald for addressing this issue per
> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/Mk/bsd.gcc.mk?sortby=date&view=log
> clamav now builds.
Thanks for the confirmation. And sorry for the temporary breakage.
Gerald
_
Am 27.10.2013 um 21:11 schrieb Matthew Seaman :
> On 27/10/2013 18:53, Axel Rau wrote:
>> I looked at poudriere earlier, but did not recognize that it plays with pkg
>> nicely and also did not like to set up a web server to just serve local
>> jails.
>> I will give it a try.
>
> You don't need
On 2013-11-24 12:43, Axel Rau wrote:
>
> Am 27.10.2013 um 21:11 schrieb Matthew Seaman :
>
>> On 27/10/2013 18:53, Axel Rau wrote:
>>> I looked at poudriere earlier, but did not recognize that it plays with pkg
>>> nicely and also did not like to set up a web server to just serve local
>>> jail
Dear all,
a new tarball is available:
https://bsdistfiles.googlecode.com/files/m20131124.tar.bz2
It contains mostly fixes for staging and dependencies.
I tested a variety of options on 9/stable on amd64 and i386 and on
8/stable i386, so there is a good chance it 'just works' on your box.
Please
I've researched that this is a problem which occurs when using CLang to
build.
Is there a known solution for this?
Thanks for reading this.
===> Building for traverso-0.49.2
-- Traverso 0.49.2 will be built to install into /usr/local
getconf: no such configuration parameter `LFS_CFLAGS'
-- Check i
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> +--On 23 novembre 2013 16:27:12 +0200 Kimmo Paasiala
> wrote:
> | Were these left out by accident or why aren’t they included?
> |
> | - x11/gnome2, x11/gnome2-lite is in the repo.
> |
> | - editors/vim, editors/vim-lite is in the repo as
SLURM is an open-source resource manager designed for *nix clusters of all
sizes. It provides three key functions. First it allocates exclusive and/or
non-exclusive access to resources (computer nodes) to users for some duration
of time so they can perform work. Second, it provides a framework for
Having gotten past all the difficulties that related to Perl, I have
finally managed to update essentially all of my installed ports. (I
still have a small problem with the update for ffmpeg(2), but I'll
take that up later on.)
Unfortunately, after updating all my ports I find that I now have a
In message <845a2e7e540e58efd7f05...@atuin.in.mat.cc>,
Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>rfg wrote:
>| Why would _anything_ that is in any way dependent upon the Perl
>| interpreter need to be rebuilt? In this switch to threads=on, has the
>| language itself changed? And if not, shouldn't the change to
- Change master sites
- Change maintainer email to @FreeBSD.org
- Change Desktop entry file
- Support STAGEDIR
- Add DOCS Option
- Use only one WWW
Approved by:pawel / wg (mentors, implicit)
-
Build ID: 20131125000
I think my question is slightly off-topic, but I think freebsd-ports@
may be the best of many not so good fits:
I need to build packages for Solaris and SmartOS. My first choice
would be ports, which unfortunately are not very well suited to
cross-building. Instead I use, as many people, pkgsrc.
I quit using SKK. Please reset maintainer of following ports.
- japanese/skk-jisyo
- japanese/skk-jisyo-cdb
Rgds,
--
`whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w`
meta
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To u
Am 22.11.2013 12:52, schrieb Mathieu Arnold:
> +--On 22 novembre 2013 00:25:26 -0800 "Ronald F. Guilmette"
> wrote:
> | AUTHOR: m...@freebsd.org
>
> Cough, cough, yeah, I mostly wrote that.
>
> | portupgrade -o lang/perl5.16 -f perl-5.14.\*
>
> At that time, that line was right. Now,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 23.11.2013 23:25, schrieb Matthew Seaman:
> On 23/11/2013 22:12, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>>> and you will thus need to recompile all ports that depend on Perl.
>> This is the part that is still utterly baffling.
>>
>> Why would _anything_ that is
Am 23.11.2013 12:20, schrieb Mark Martinec:
> On Friday 22 November 2013 21:40:07 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>> Now, one last little thing...
>>
>> The note in the UPDATING file dated 20131120 gives essentially the same
>> instructions as the one dated 20131023, *however* it also contains this:
>>
On 2013-11-25 07:40, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 23.11.2013 12:20, schrieb Mark Martinec:
>> On Friday 22 November 2013 21:40:07 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>>> Now, one last little thing...
>>>
>>> The note in the UPDATING file dated 20131120 gives essentially the same
>>> instructions as the one d
Am 25.11.2013 07:53, schrieb olli hauer:
> On 2013-11-25 07:40, Matthias Andree wrote:
>> Am 23.11.2013 12:20, schrieb Mark Martinec:
>>> On Friday 22 November 2013 21:40:07 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Now, one last little thing...
The note in the UPDATING file dated 20131120 gives es
On 25/11/2013 11:45, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote:
> I think my question is slightly off-topic, but I think freebsd-ports@
> may be the best of many not so good fits:
>
> I need to build packages for Solaris and SmartOS. My first choice
> would be ports, which unfortunately are not very well suited t
On 11/25/2013 02:15, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote:
> I think my question is slightly off-topic, but I think freebsd-ports@
> may be the best of many not so good fits:
>
> I need to build packages for Solaris and SmartOS. My first choice
> would be ports, which unfortunately are not very well suited t
24 matches
Mail list logo
