Fwd: [RELEASE - head-amd64-default][devel/libwfut] Build failed for libwfut-0.2.2_1 during build

2013-09-13 Thread Oliver Lehmann
Hi, has someone an idea what could cause this error? I'm not able to reproduce it with clang on FreeBSD 9 It looks like stdlib.h is not included by it is via libwfut/platform.cpp Greetings - Weitergeleitete Nachricht von pkg-fall...@freebsd.org - Datum: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 05:35:27

[HEADSUP][CFT] New compiler USES flag, please test, review comment

2013-09-13 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi, Given how old our gcc in base is and the work done on clang and libc++. It is becoming complicating to make some ports properly working on all supported version of FreeBSD. To help in that I would like to propose a new USES: compiler http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/compiler.mk.txt What it

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] New compiler USES flag, please test, review comment

2013-09-13 Thread Jerry
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:17:53 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin articulated: > Hi, > > Given how old our gcc in base is and the work done on clang and > libc++. > > It is becoming complicating to make some ports properly working on > all supported version of FreeBSD. > > To help in that I would like to p

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] New compiler USES flag, please test, review comment

2013-09-13 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 2013-Sep-13, 15:17, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > USES= compiler:c++11 > > Means you need a c++1 capable compiler but not necessary a c++ 11 aware > standard > library, in that case if the base compiler is not able to support c++11 > clang33 > will be used from ports otherwise gcc 4.6+ if you s

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] New compiler USES flag, please test, review comment

2013-09-13 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
13.09.2013, 19:04, "Pietro Cerutti" : > On 2013-Sep-13, 15:17, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >>  USES= compiler:c++11 >> >>  Means you need a c++1 capable compiler but not necessary a c++ 11 aware >> standard >>  library, in that case if the base compiler is not able to support c++11 >> clang33 >

FreeBSD Port: libgd-2.1.0_1,1

2013-09-13 Thread Joel F Rodriguez
Hi, I keep rebuilding this package and it appears that the pkg info never gets updated. ===> Running ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib ===> Registering installation for libgd-2.1.0_1,1 gd-2.0.35_9,1 < needs updating (port has 2.1.0_1,1) I can't

Re: Berkeley DB 4.1

2013-09-13 Thread Michael Grimm
On 12.09.2013, at 13:34, Ivan Voras wrote: > Yes, I've had WITH_BDB_VER?=48 in my standard /etc/make.conf Please excuse my ignorance, but I couldn't find the meaning of that '?'. Does that stand for "*at least* version db48"? Or? Thanks in advance, Michael

Re: Berkeley DB 4.1

2013-09-13 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 13-set-2013, at 21:01, Michael Grimm wrote: > On 12.09.2013, at 13:34, Ivan Voras wrote: > >> Yes, I've had WITH_BDB_VER?=48 in my standard /etc/make.conf > > Please excuse my ignorance, but I couldn't find the meaning of > that '?'. Does that stand for "*at least* version db48"? Or? Set

Re: Berkeley DB 4.1

2013-09-13 Thread olli hauer
On 2013-09-12 12:57, Ivan Voras wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to start a discussion on changing the default BDB port from 4.1 > to something more recent. > > bdb version 4.1 was last released in 2002: > README: Sleepycat Software: Berkeley DB 4.1.25: (December 19, 2002) > > There are some ports w

Re: Berkeley DB 4.1

2013-09-13 Thread Michael Grimm
On 13.09.2013, at 21:56, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 13-set-2013, at 21:01, Michael Grimm wrote: >> On 12.09.2013, at 13:34, Ivan Voras wrote: >>> Yes, I've had WITH_BDB_VER?=48 in my standard /etc/make.conf >> >> Please excuse my ignorance, but I couldn't find the meaning of >> that '?'. Does

Re: Berkeley DB 4.1

2013-09-13 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 13.09.2013 21:11, schrieb olli hauer: > On 2013-09-12 12:57, Ivan Voras wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'd like to start a discussion on changing the default BDB port from 4.1 >> to something more recent. >> >> bdb version 4.1 was last released in 2002: >> README: Sleepycat Software: Berkeley DB 4.1.25:

Re: FreeBSD Port: libgd-2.1.0_1,1

2013-09-13 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Joel F Rodriguez wrote: > Hi, > > > > I keep rebuilding this package and it appears that the pkg info never gets > updated. > > > > ===> Running ldconfig > > /sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib > > ===> Registering installation for libgd-2.1.0_1,1 > > > > gd-2.0.