Re: Part of bsd.port.mk broken with pkgng

2013-08-27 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 06:08:28AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Hi, > > in bsd.port.mk there is a variable ACTUAL-PACKAGE-DEPENDS. To my > understanding it is broken with pkgng. The target where this is used is > still used if FORCE_PACKAGE is set. > > Can someone confirm (I've only read t

Re: ports/177797: [PATCH] mail/postfix-policyd-spf-python: update to 1.1 and etc.

2013-08-27 Thread Yasuhiro KIMURA
Once more, would someone please commit this PR? Currently this port is broken due to update of mail/py-spf to 2.0.9, and this PR need to be committed to fix it. Best regards. --- Yasuhiro KIMURA From: Yasuhiro KIMURA Subject: Re: ports/177797: [PATCH] mail/postfix-policyd-spf-python: update to

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2013-08-27 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

[HEADS UP] Maintainers will receive emails about their ports failing to build

2013-08-27 Thread Bryan Drewery
Hi porters, FreeBSD 10 is fast approaching and many ports fail to build due to clang and other changes in HEAD. Not all maintainers are aware their ports fail to build. In the past we have manually sent failing build logs to maintainers and committers. Starting September 4th, we will start automa

Attention: ports/180773: [Maintainer update] sysutils/qjail Bug fix.

2013-08-27 Thread qjail
Attention, Would someone please commit this PR? Best regards. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=180773 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fr

Re: Global destructor order problems

2013-08-27 Thread Michael Gmelin
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 17:04:28 +0300 Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 03:41:48PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > On 2013-06-27 01:56, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:28:33 +0300 > > > Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > > > >> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:17:41PM

security/openssl speed issues

2013-08-27 Thread Ollivier Robert
Hello Dirk ! As I got a new machine with the AES-NI crypto extensions, I'm getting interested with it and as you may have seen, I've already merged into stable/9 two changesets for AES-NI support in GELI & cryptodev. Now, I'm trying to measure the impact of said AES extentions, I tumbled on a

Re: security/openssl speed issues

2013-08-27 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Ollivier Robert wrote this message on Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 17:32 +0200: > As I got a new machine with the AES-NI crypto extensions, I'm getting > interested with it and as you may have seen, I've already merged into > stable/9 two changesets for AES-NI support in GELI & cryptodev. > > Now, I'm t

[QAT] r325473: 4x leftovers

2013-08-27 Thread Ports-QAT
Update to 1.8.4 Changes: https://raw.github.com/git/git/master/Documentation/RelNotes/1.8.4.txt - Build ID: 20130827172600-15177 Job owner: w...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 9 minutes Enddate:

Re: security/openssl speed issues

2013-08-27 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to John-Mark Gurney: > As far as I can tell, 1.0.1e doesn't properly detect AES-NI and uses > these instructions when present, and cryptodev usage doesn't work, and > doesn't warn when it fails... > > My own program that tests cryptodev out performs openssl because of > this.. Yeah, tha

Re: security/openssl speed issues

2013-08-27 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to John-Mark Gurney: > I discovered a similar issue on HEAD w/ 1.0.1e where openssl speed -engine > aes-256-cbc when ktraced would not issue any ioctl's during the speed > test... You can see that it opens the device, but then it gets a number > of failures: > 11466 openssl CALL ioctl(

Re: security/openssl speed issues

2013-08-27 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Ollivier Robert: > Notice the CDRIOCINITWRITER? My run does not show these: so after these > lines, there are no "sessions" available and cryptodev is in fact not used. Note to oneself, do not try to kdump a 9.1 trace file on a 9.2 system. Forget the CDRIOCINITWRITER. kdump -A out

FreeBSD Port: gdal-1.10.0

2013-08-27 Thread Hacker, Benjamin T - GS
Dear Sir, I have attempted to update my Installed Ports. I am having an issue with the GDAL port as listed below. Any assistance you can provide would be greatly appreciated! Thanks! {root@FreeBSD-OSM:/usr/ports/graphics/gdal # make install . . . gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/gr

submitting multiple ports at once

2013-08-27 Thread Aryeh Friedman
What is the best way to submit 4 or 5 ports at once (I have all the port files themselves stored on the same site that the distfiles are on and contain the same general pattern of ftp:://site.com/XXX/port-0.1.tar.gz)... so I do it one PR per port with the standard subject for a new port or a single

Re: submitting multiple ports at once

2013-08-27 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 08/27/2013 05:53 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > What is the best way to submit 4 or 5 ports at once (I have all the port > files themselves stored on the same site that the distfiles are on and > contain the same general pattern of ftp:://site.com/XXX/port-0.1.tar.gz)... > so I do it one PR per por

distfiles changed to new path

2013-08-27 Thread Fbsd8
I just did a portsnap run that updated the base port system. Now I see a port's distfile going to /var/ports/distfiles instead of /usr/ports/distfiles. Is this a error in the newly updated base port system which contains the default port make environment? _

Re: security/openssl speed issues

2013-08-27 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Ollivier Robert wrote this message on Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 17:32 +0200: > As I got a new machine with the AES-NI crypto extensions, I'm getting > interested with it and as you may have seen, I've already merged into > stable/9 two changesets for AES-NI support in GELI & cryptodev. > > Now, I'm t

Re: distfiles changed to new path

2013-08-27 Thread Thomas Mueller
from Fbsd8: > I just did a portsnap run that updated the base port system. > Now I see a port's distfile going to /var/ports/distfiles instead of > /usr/ports/distfiles. > Is this a error in the newly updated base port system which contains > the default port make environment? I have no directo

Re: FreeBSD Port: gdal-1.10.0

2013-08-27 Thread Rainer Hurling
Am 27.08.2013 23:31 (UTC+1) schrieb Hacker, Benjamin T - GS: > Dear Sir, > > I have attempted to update my Installed Ports. I am having an issue with the > GDAL port as listed below. Any assistance you can provide would be greatly > appreciated! > > Thanks! > > {root@FreeBSD-OSM:/usr/ports/g

Re: portsdb + rrdmerge = *hiccup*

2013-08-27 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Sorry, should be fixed already. Thanks for raising the flag. -Max On Aug 16, 2013 10:03 PM, "Matthew D. Fuller" wrote: > Hey guys, > > Since databases/rrdmerge showed up in ports, portupgrade seems to have > gotten a bit unhappy with INDEX: > > [Updating the portsdb [...] > /usr/ports/INDEX-8:1