Compiling port graphics/blender ends up in the follwoig error due to an
compiler error on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT ( FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0
r253917: Sat Aug 3 20:33:55 CEST 2013).
Prior to build (or try to build/upgrade) I had to apply the patches
(last in row) suggested in PR ports/180650
(graphic
+-+
www/xpi-pentadactyl | 20130407| 20130804
+-+
If any of the above results are invalid, please check the
Try this,
diff --git a/www/chromium/Makefile b/www/chromium/Makefile
index af1fd1b..dab973d 100644
--- a/www/chromium/Makefile
+++ b/www/chromium/Makefile
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ post-patch:
${WRKSRC}/ui/base/strings/app_locale_settings_th.xtb
do-configure:
- cd ${WRKSRC} && \
on 04/08/2013 15:10 George Liaskos said the following:
> Try this,
>
> diff --git a/www/chromium/Makefile b/www/chromium/Makefile
> index af1fd1b..dab973d 100644
> --- a/www/chromium/Makefile
> +++ b/www/chromium/Makefile
> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ post-patch:
> ${WRKSRC}/ui/base/string
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 09:41 -0400, Andre Goree wrote:
> I'm running KDE4 w/pulseaudio built entirely from ports -- albeit on
> 8.4-STABLE. I also use portupgrade rather than portmaster, though that
> shouldn't matter. Why not start with posting some of the errors that
> you got along with the
Sorry this weekend was quite busy. I have the build running now.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Dear committers,
as it is holiday season I kindly ask here if someone could please commit
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=180951
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=180952
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=180953
as they contain critical (remote code excecution) fixes.
- Convert to new perl framework
Approved by:bapt@ (maintainer)
-
Build ID: 20130804123400-63001
Job owner: a...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 4 hours
Enddate: Sun, 04 Aug 2013 16:33:56 GMT
www/p5-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding now part of core of Catalyst modules.
Mark it as deprecated and set expiration date.
Remove it as dependency from:
www/p5-Catalyst-Plugin-AutoCRUD
www/p5-Task-Catalyst
and bump PORTREVISION of this ports to indicate packages change.
With hat: perl@
--
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Marcin Wisnicki
wrote:
> You will need this patch:
> http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/mail-notification/5.4.dfsg.1-8/disable-werror.patch
> from which you have to strip first directory in file name.
Thanks, testing now:
root@kg-core1# pwd
/us
I guess bsd.gnome.mk should be smart enough to `killall -HUP gconfd-2`
at package post-install when port uses gconf (has GCONF_SCHEMAS).
Please file a PR against gnome ports.
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Marcin Wisnicki
> wrot
A user notified me that one of my ports does not compile. I've
immediately checked portsmon[1] and noticed that build statuses are
empty. In the past there was a table with information about last
successful builds and in any case there should be a build error. Does
that mean that portsmon is no lon
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 08:48:41PM +0200, Marcin Wiśnicki wrote:
> A user notified me that one of my ports does not compile. I've
> immediately checked portsmon[1] and noticed that build statuses are
> empty. In the past there was a table with information about last
> successful builds and in any c
But didn't it use to show last successful builds too ? Now it just
says "None" which is not very helpful.
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 08:48:41PM +0200, Marcin Wiśnicki wrote:
>> A user notified me that one of my ports does not compile. I've
BTW there are no build errors on build cluster. Is there anything
non-standard about your build environment ?
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Marcin Wisnicki
wrote:
> I guess bsd.gnome.mk should be smart enough to `killall -HUP gconfd-2`
> at package post-install when port uses gconf (has GCONF_S
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 09:14:32PM +0200, Marcin Wiśnicki wrote:
> But didn't it use to show last successful builds too ? Now it just
> says "None" which is not very helpful.
No, it doesn't have that information, sorry.
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
On 08/03/13 11:29, Johan van Selst wrote:
> Johan van Selst wrote:
>> cpghost wrote:
>>> I've discovered the reason for this:
>> Ah, great. Now I can reproduce it as well. You are right, it is a hidden
>> dependency (with no sensible way of turning it off). I shall add your
>> patch with an explici
Dear purchase manager,
Wish you enjoy a great day!
We get your name and email address from Internet that You are in the production
of plastic products.
we would like to introduce our company and products,hope that we may build
business cooperation in the future.
General-purpose Plastic
PE
> Subject: Completing i386-wine
> Date: Saturday, 3 August 2013, 14:46:06
> Hi All,
> There has been one major missing piece of i386-wine. The ability for the port
> to "build" and install under amd64 (and thus to appear in the official repos
> of FreeBSD). Since the Port's Coll
Would there also be the possibility to have i386-wine as a source-code
> port, and build from i386 installation? That avoids cross-compiling.
>
> One could build an i386 installation either from amd64 or previous i386
> installation, then build i386-wine and other desired ports when booted into
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
