Re: hugin, libboost_thread.so not found

2013-06-23 Thread Vasil Dimov
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 03:30:16 -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > Cannot get hugin to work, > I get the following: > > $ hugin > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libboost_thread.so"not > found, required by "hugin" > $ [...] Hi, what is the output of the following commands, when executed in your e

Re: Can not update png on 8.2-RELEASE-p9 amd64

2013-06-23 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Hans de Hartog wrote: >Title says it all. WITH_PKGNG=yes. Error message: Support for 8.2-RELEASE has ended about a year ago. https://www.freebsd.org/security/unsupported.html -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de __

Re: net-mgmt/cflowd 2.1.b1 build failure

2013-06-23 Thread Kim Culhan
On Mon, June 17, 2013 10:47 pm, Mark Felder wrote: > I just did a build of this in poudriere with no issues. I'd guess you > have a dirty build environment. Can you post the contents of your > make.conf? This build failure is happening on 2 machines running -current, r251377. >From the port Makef

Re: hugin, libboost_thread.so not found

2013-06-23 Thread Rob Clark
On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 10:35:43 +0300 Vasil Dimov wrote: > On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 03:30:16 -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > > Cannot get hugin to work, > > I get the following: > > > > $ hugin > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libboost_thread.so"not > > found, required by "hugin" > > $ > [...]

Re: Are ports supposed to build and run on 10-CURRENT?

2013-06-23 Thread Michael Gmelin
On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 08:09:05 +0200 Michael Gmelin wrote: > On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 00:27:53 +0200 > Dimitry Andric wrote: > > > On Jun 21, 2013, at 22:07, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > > On Jun 13, 2013, at 03:15, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > ... > > >> - system clang + std=c++11 + system libc++: Build

Re: Are ports supposed to build and run on 10-CURRENT?

2013-06-23 Thread Michael Gmelin
On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 22:16:07 +0200 Michael Gmelin wrote: > On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 08:09:05 +0200 > Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 00:27:53 +0200 > > Dimitry Andric wrote: > > > > > On Jun 21, 2013, at 22:07, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > > > On Jun 13, 2013, at 03:15, Michael Gme

Re: LICENSE and PORTREVISION bump

2013-06-23 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 01:18:16PM +0200, Pawel Pekala wrote: > Dnia 2013-06-15, o godz. 14:26:27 > Boris Samorodov napisaŠ(a): > >The FreeBSD Porters Book claims that a PORTREVISION should be bumped > >if a significant change is made to a port. > > > >My question is "Should a PORTREVISION be bump