Someone from Oregon Tech cordially invited you
datemyschool
Someone from Oregon Tech invited you
w**@oit.edu would rather stay anonymous for now.
If you sign up for datemyschool, you'll be able to meet people you don't know
yet, who are students or alumni from universities all around the co
On 6/10/2013 1:33 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
pkg install -Rf lang/php
Ok, so that's the only way, will keep that in mind, thank you.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send
On 11/06/2013 16:20, Martin Wilke wrote:
As we all know FreeBSD 10 brings a new compiler along, and for that
we need to get ports on the right track. I have done several exp-runs
on the current src and we still have a lot of fallouts. We would like
to ask you to have a look [1] at the failed por
As someone familiar with doing ports but can't write a lick of code
beyond some basic scripting or Perl -- how can I help? Are there
guidelines for this project? Should we take known broken ports and test
them against different versions of GCC and CLANG in the ports tree until
we find one that work
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Shane Ambler wrote:
> On 11/06/2013 16:20, Martin Wilke wrote:
>
>> As we all know FreeBSD 10 brings a new compiler along, and for that
>> we need to get ports on the right track. I have done several exp-runs
>> on the current src and we still have a lot of fallout
Do not try to remove other port directory (fix build at 10.x).
-
Build ID: 20130611123801-16360
Job owner: b...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 35 minutes
Enddate: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 13:12:52 GMT
Hi,
I've not found any bug report about that kind of problem and I prefer to
send this both on -multimedia and -ports, because I don't know where the
problem can be.
It takes one to three seconds to VLC to change volume, it's a big
latency. There was a similar bug in VLC's bugtracker for version
Hmm, noone seems to know the answer to my question - which is a kind of odd
since I would believe that the ports list was the right place for this kind
question.
I would appreciate any pointers to where I can find or ask for this
information.
Thanks
/Uffe
--
View this message in context:
h
I'm running FreeBSD/amd64 8-STABLE (r250276) and, yesterday, updated
www/rubygem-passenger from 3.0.19 to 4.0.5 via portmaster. Although the port
upgraded without error, the resultant Passenger no longer works: it complains
it can't find "bash" and Rails apps won't spawn.
I don't have shells/b
It depends entirely on the version that you are after. There is a release set
of packages that isn't updated, but the stable set are updated fairly regularly.
Have a look in man pkg_add for some environment variables to set to change the
site/set you are downloading.
Chris
> I'm running FreeBSD/amd64 8-STABLE (r250276) and, yesterday, updated
> www/rubygem-passenger from 3.0.19 to 4.0.5 via portmaster. Although the
> port upgraded without error, the resultant Passenger no longer works: it
> complains it can't find "bash" and Rails apps won't spawn.
>
> I don't have
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your reply.
I'm aware about the PACKAGEROOT PACKAGESITE etc environment variables.
But that does not really help me - my question still stands - since all
package build activity have happend the last 2 months (since april 16.)
I've created a script that traverses the closes
On 2013-06-11 08:50, Martin Wilke wrote:
> As we all know FreeBSD 10 brings a new compiler along, and for that
> we need to get ports on the right track. I have done several exp-runs
> on the current src and we still have a lot of fallouts. We would like
> to ask you to have a look [1] at the faile
Hello Bernhard, All,
I'm not sure if it's a redports or ports or my problem but here it is.
There are two builds:
https://redports.org/buildarchive/20130611124423-47017/
https://redports.org/buildarchive/2013062729-60666/
They differ only at having or not just one line at pkg-plist:
-
@d
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Steve Wills wrote:
>> I'm running FreeBSD/amd64 8-STABLE (r250276) and, yesterday, updated
>> www/rubygem-passenger from 3.0.19 to 4.0.5 via portmaster. Although the
>> port upgraded without error, the resultant Passenger no longer works: it
>> complains it can't
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 08:40:31PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:39:03PM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:34:19PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:17:24PM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > > O
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Steve Wills wrote:
>> I've included at the end a snippet from httpd-error.log showing the
>> behaviour of the new Passenger 4.0.5 prior to the workaround I put in
>> place mentioned in the preceding paragraph.
>
> I think it only calls bash like that when it crashe
On 6/11/2013 11:51 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 08:40:31PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:39:03PM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:34:19PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 0
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:52:59AM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 6/11/2013 11:51 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 08:40:31PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:39:03PM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:3
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 18:51:02 +0200
Eitan Adler articulated:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Steve Wills
> wrote:
> >> I've included at the end a snippet from httpd-error.log showing the
> >> behaviour of the new Passenger 4.0.5 prior to the workaround I put
> >> in place mentioned in the prece
On 6/11/2013 12:17 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:52:59AM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>
>> On 6/11/2013 11:51 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 08:40:31PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:39:03PM +0400, Slawa O
Hi all,
i'm not the maintainer, but i send the pr since owncloud 5.0.0 to
upgrade the port.
The current port version is 5.0.5, which has many critical issues
(security & stability).
Since 3 days the the 5.0.7 is out. I have also sent a 5.0.6 patch 1
month ago and the maintener seems to not be there
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:33:57 -0500, Loïc BLOT
wrote:
Hi all,
i'm not the maintainer, but i send the pr since owncloud 5.0.0 to
upgrade the port.
The current port version is 5.0.5, which has many critical issues
(security & stability).
Since 3 days the the 5.0.7 is out. I have also sent a 5.0.
Of course :)
Is there any other way to update the port ? I use owncloud at home and
at work (30-40 users, and that increase) then i send update when i'm
sure no functionnality is a problem.
--
Best regards,
Loïc BLOT,
UNIX systems, security and network expert
http://www.unix-experience.fr
Le
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Jerry wrote:
> I totally agree. Plus, perhaps the port can be modified to use "env"
> to locate bash; ie, "\usr\bin\env bash". I use it all the time for
> shell scripts that I write for various systems and it hasn't failed
> me yet.
Aye. bapt@ is working on
Hi Loic,
> Hi all,
> i'm not the maintainer, but i send the pr since owncloud 5.0.0 to
> upgrade the port.
> The current port version is 5.0.5, which has many critical issues
> (security & stability).
> Since 3 days the the 5.0.7 is out. I have also sent a 5.0.6 patch 1
> month ago and the mainten
Thanks for your reply Frederic, that's great for FreeBSD owncloud
community users :)
--
Best regards,
Loïc BLOT,
UNIX systems, security and network expert
http://www.unix-experience.fr
Le mardi 11 juin 2013 à 21:07 +0200, Frederic Culot a écrit :
> Hi Loic,
>
> > Hi all,
> > i'm not the mai
On Jun 11, 2013, at 10:04 AM, "Steve Wills" wrote:
>> I'm running FreeBSD/amd64 8-STABLE (r250276) and, yesterday, updated
>> www/rubygem-passenger from 3.0.19 to 4.0.5 via portmaster. Although the
>> port upgraded without error, the resultant Passenger no longer works: it
>> complains it can't
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 02:50:03PM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> As we all know FreeBSD 10 brings a new compiler along, and for that we need
> to get ports on the right
> track. I have done several exp-runs on the current src and we still have a
> lot of fallouts. We
> would like
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:21:56PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 02:50:03PM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > As we all know FreeBSD 10 brings a new compiler along, and for that we need
> > to get ports on the right
> > track. I have done several
Am 11.06.2013 21:22 schrieb "Konstantin Belousov" :
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 02:50:03PM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > As we all know FreeBSD 10 brings a new compiler along, and for that we
need to get ports on the right
> > track. I have done several exp-runs on the curren
Hi--
On Jun 11, 2013, at 12:21 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 02:50:03PM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
>> As we all know FreeBSD 10 brings a new compiler along, and for that we need
>> to get ports on the right
>> track. I have done several exp-runs on the current src and
> Thanks for your reply Frederic, that's great for FreeBSD owncloud
> community users :)
Well, there's nothing to be proud of here as we should have been much
more reactive considering the number of vulnerabilities that were
brought to light since last month.
I just committed your update to own
Hi,
I'm running
# uname -a
FreeBSD atom0 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243826: Tue Dec 4
06:55:39 UTC 2012
r...@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
and I'm trying to install `cups-base` port.
Just ran one more time `portsnap fetch update`.
Here's what I got:
===>
On my system (9.1-RELEASE-p3 on amd64), libchk reports:
Unresolvable link(s) found in: /usr/local/lib/liblangtag-gobject.so.2
liblangtag.so.1
'pkg which' informs me that:
/usr/local/lib/liblangtag-gobject.so.2 was not found in the database
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 02:50:03PM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
> As we all know FreeBSD 10 brings a new compiler along, and for that we
> need > to get ports on the right track. I have done several exp-runs on
> the current src and we still have a lot of fallouts. We would like to
> ask you to have
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:21:56PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> What you are proposing is de-facto forking the whole open-source code
> base. This cannot work, and in fact steals the FreeBSD resources for
> something which has absolutely no relevance for FreeBSD project.
>From what I see th
37 matches
Mail list logo
