On Sat, 2013-05-25 at 01:00 -0500, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 1:51 PM, O. Hartmann
> wrote:
> > The sources of of port provide their own m4 macros (i.e. AX_PTHREAD,
> > AX_BOOST) store in ax_boost.m4 in m4 of the toplevel dir of the sources.
> >
> > I have to issue USE_AUTOTOOLS=
On 24 May 2013 22:23, Kenta Suzumoto wrote:
>
> Hello all. The editors/vim port is currently a mess and needs some changes.
>
> - It fetches almost 700 patches from what seems like a dial-up connection in
> AUSTRALIA.
>
> You might as well be downloading a 1080p movie from a rock in the north pol
On 05/25/13 10:50, Chris Rees wrote:
>
> Alternatively, perhaps we need an editors/vim-options port
Just for the record, editors/vim was (and shells/bash) was converted to
optionsNG not too long ago.
Regards!
--
Niclas
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
On 25 May 2013 11:54, Niclas Zeising wrote:
> On 05/25/13 10:50, Chris Rees wrote:
>>
>> Alternatively, perhaps we need an editors/vim-options port
>
> Just for the record, editors/vim was (and shells/bash) was converted to
> optionsNG not too long ago.
Ah, that's at least some good news. I
On 5/25/2013 13:24, Chris Rees wrote:
On 25 May 2013 11:54, Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 05/25/13 10:50, Chris Rees wrote:
Alternatively, perhaps we need an editors/vim-options port
Just for the record, editors/vim was (and shells/bash) was converted to
optionsNG not too long ago.
Ah, tha
Am 25.05.2013 13:28, schrieb John Marino:
> On 5/25/2013 13:24, Chris Rees wrote:
>> On 25 May 2013 11:54, Niclas Zeising wrote:
>>> On 05/25/13 10:50, Chris Rees wrote:
Alternatively, perhaps we need an editors/vim-options port
>>>
>>> Just for the record, editors/vim was (and shell
One more thing: I see patches up to 7.3.1012 on
http://ftp.vim.ossmirror.de/pub/vim/patches/7.3/
So much for the "won't reach 1,000". :-)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, s
> I build my custom kernel without IPv6 since I'm not going to be using
> it any time soon. The mtr port doesn't work anymore
> What can I do to fix this without enabling a useless (to me) option in my
> kernel and rebuilding?
Downgrade the mtr port to mtr-nox11-0.82_1.
I update ports tree with `
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
And now (after updates) it fails to build as well:
Configuration summary :
Version : . 0.1.8
Host CPU : amd64
Host Vendor : . portbld
Host OS : . freebsd10.0
Tools :
Compiler is GCC : .
Problem is on-going, but with different error message in poudriere logs:
===
===> Building for libfpx-1.3.1.1
Warning: Object directory not changed from original
/wrkdirs/usr/ports/graphics/libfpx/work/libfpx-1.3.1-1
g++46 -O2 -pipe -march=k8 -DHAVE
imake needs link to cpp to function correctly. It seems this error has not
been corrected as yet:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/devel-imake-build-breaks-td5810289.html
Which results in build fail for audio/nas in poudriere:
===> Configuring for nas-1.9.3
===> FreeBSD 10 autotools fix app
HEADS UP!
On 05/25/13 16:37, Niclas Zeising wrote:
> Author: zeising
> Date: Sat May 25 14:37:02 2013
> New Revision: 319055
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/319055
>
> Log:
> The FreeBSD x11 team proudly presents
> an zeising, kwm, miwi, bapt, eadler production:
>
> Xorg
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 5:21 AM, wrote:
> > I build my custom kernel without IPv6 since I'm not going to be using
> > it any time soon. The mtr port doesn't work anymore
>
> > What can I do to fix this without enabling a useless (to me) option in my
> > kernel and rebuilding?
>
> Downgrade the mt
> > > I build my custom kernel without IPv6 since I'm not going to be using
> > > it any time soon. The mtr port doesn't work anymore
> > Downgrade the mtr port to mtr-nox11-0.82_1.
> > I update ports tree with `portsnap` and use `svn export`
> > (devel/subversion port) for downgrading a single p
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 9:32 AM, wrote:
> > > > I build my custom kernel without IPv6 since I'm not going to be using
> > > > it any time soon. The mtr port doesn't work anymore
>
> > > Downgrade the mtr port to mtr-nox11-0.82_1.
>
> > > I update ports tree with `portsnap` and use `svn export`
>
Hello,
I'm compiling the ports I'm used to use (some 1200) on a 10-CURRENT
r250588 (May 13 2013) and it seems that a lot of the ports are now
broken, at least on recent 10-CURRENT; the ports tree itself is from SVN
r315646 (April 1 2013); it compiled fine on an older 10-CURRENT from May
2012, but
On 05/25/13 20:56, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm compiling the ports I'm used to use (some 1200) on a 10-CURRENT
> r250588 (May 13 2013) and it seems that a lot of the ports are now
> broken, at least on recent 10-CURRENT; the ports tree itself is from SVN
> r315646 (April 1 2013); it
I'm seeing a repeatable, consistent segmentation fault before the first
window appears (though firefox -ProfileManager brings up the
profile manager, but crashes when I try to actually start the browser).
I've deleted ~/.mozilla and just about everything I can think to get rid
of.
The system is
Is it still possible to get hardware acceleration with the radeon driver
for cards which use UMS?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr
On 05/26/13 02:55, Warren Block wrote:
> Is it still possible to get hardware acceleration with the radeon driver
> for cards which use UMS?
With the new xserver (1.12) it is not possible currently, it seems. I
haven't tested the old server.
Hopefully the ATI KMS work will be ready for testing in
(I'm not subscribed to this list so keep me CC'd)
Re: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2013-May/083766.html
I've already discussed this before -- with you in fact -- and did the
full analysis. Users should read it in full:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2013-Ma
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 11:40:05PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Please see that this port is rolled back to 0.82 (specifically reverting
> r213277). I believe PORTREVISION should also be set to 2 when rolling
> back, because there have been other Makefile changes between 0.82
> PORTREVISION=1 a
23 matches
Mail list logo
