Hi,
in case I made some local modifications to a ports Makefile in the
past with CVSup it was "easy" to get everything back in-sync by just
running CVSup. With portsnap fetch update, my modified Makefile stays
modified. What is the suggested way in syncing my local portstree 1:1
with
I see in the UPDATING file that I need to rebuild all ports that depend on pcre
and icu:
portmaster -w -r pcre
and
portmaster -w -r icu
(I don't need -f ?)
How do I do this without rebuilding the same ports twice?
I am on pkgng, so I can use
pkg info -r icu
and same for pcre to list ports depen
On 01/22/13 13:10, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
in case I made some local modifications to a ports Makefile in the
past with CVSup it was "easy" to get everything back in-sync by just
running CVSup. With portsnap fetch update, my modified Makefile stays
modified. What is the suggested way in sy
On 01/22/13 13:10, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
in case I made some local modifications to a ports Makefile in the
past with CVSup it was "easy" to get everything back in-sync by just
running CVSup. With portsnap fetch update, my modified Makefile stays
modified. What is the suggested way in sy
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:10:26 +0100
Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in case I made some local modifications to a ports Makefile in
> the past with CVSup it was "easy" to get everything back in-sync by
> just running CVSup. With portsnap fetch update, my modified Makefile
> stays modified. What
This is on sparc64 r239940 with ports tree at r310800.
# pkg info -xo nettle
nettle-2.5: security/nettle
#
Updating to 2.6 I got:
cc -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -ggdb3 -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wmissing-declarations -Wsrict-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wbad-function-cast
-Wnested-ex
Guido Falsi wrote:
If you use small modifications on a ingle system(or just a few) you
could track the ports tree with subversion, which will be happy to
keep and try to merge your local modifcations. You can also diff and
revert your modifications using it, which can be quite handy.
Di
On 01/22/13 14:00, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
Guido Falsi wrote:
If you use small modifications on a ingle system(or just a few) you
could track the ports tree with subversion, which will be happy to
keep and try to merge your local modifcations. You can also diff and
revert your modifications usi
On 01/22/13 07:00, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
Guido Falsi wrote:
If you use small modifications on a ingle system(or just a few) you
could track the ports tree with subversion, which will be happy to
keep and try to merge your local modifcations. You can also diff and
revert your modifications usi
On 01/22/13 06:26, Thomas Mueller wrote:
I see in the UPDATING file that I need to rebuild all ports that depend on pcre
and icu:
portmaster -w -r pcre
and
portmaster -w -r icu
(I don't need -f ?)
How do I do this without rebuilding the same ports twice?
I am on pkgng, so I can use
pkg info -
The typical and simple rc.d script to launch a service has, esentially,
the following:
. /etc/rc.subr
name=SERVICE
rcvar=SERVICE_enable
command="/usr/local/sbin/PROGRAM"
pidfile=/var/run/${name}.pid
SERVICE_enable=${SERVICE_enable:-"NO"}
load_rc_config ${name}
run_rc_command "$1"
One of the
On 01/22/2013 04:19 PM, Javier Martín Rueda wrote:
The typical and simple rc.d script to launch a service has, esentially,
the following:
. /etc/rc.subr
name=SERVICE
rcvar=SERVICE_enable
command="/usr/local/sbin/PROGRAM"
pidfile=/var/run/${name}.pid
SERVICE_enable=${SERVICE_enable:-"NO"}
loa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/22/13 10:29 AM, Grzegorz Blach wrote:
> On 01/22/2013 04:19 PM, Javier Mart￭n Rueda wrote:
>> The typical and simple rc.d script to launch a service has,
>> esentially, the following:
>>
>> . /etc/rc.subr
>>
>> name=SERVICE rcvar=SERVICE_enable
"Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" wrote:
I know when I run it manually and there is a conflict, it will tell
me about a merge-conflict and ask me which file to keep (mine or
theirs), selecting theirs, afaik, overwrites my local file.
And when there is no conflict and it can be merged, you have a merged
On 01/22/13 16:59, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
"Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" wrote:
I know when I run it manually and there is a conflict, it will tell me
about a merge-conflict and ask me which file to keep (mine or theirs),
selecting theirs, afaik, overwrites my local file.
And when there is no conflict
Also look at the wrapper script used by net/socat. There are a few ports
using that.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:35:04 -0600
Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
> On 01/22/13 06:26, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > I see in the UPDATING file that I need to rebuild all ports that
> > depend on pcre and icu:
> >
> > portmaster -w -r pcre
> > and
> > portmaster -w -r icu
> > (I don't need -f ?)
> >
> > Ho
On 01/22/13 09:59, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
"Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" wrote:
I know when I run it manually and there is a conflict, it will tell me
about a merge-conflict and ask me which file to keep (mine or theirs),
selecting theirs, afaik, overwrites my local file.
And when there is no conflict
On 01/22/13 17:21, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
On 01/22/13 09:59, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
"Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" wrote:
I know when I run it manually and there is a conflict, it will tell me
about a merge-conflict and ask me which file to keep (mine or theirs),
selecting theirs, afaik, overwrites m
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:59:56 +0100
Oliver Lehmann wrote:
>
> "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" wrote:
> > I know when I run it manually and there is a conflict, it will
> > tell me about a merge-conflict and ask me which file to keep (mine
> > or theirs), selecting theirs, afaik, overwrites my local file.
>
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 20:55:40 +
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 18/01/2013 02:57, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>
> > a. I understand that my use case is not necessarily pkgng's top
> >priority. Ultimately requirement 2 is pretty nonsensical for
> >distributing open source packages
>
> Well, yes.
Hi Guys,
Wondering if anybody else has tried installing Postgres from packages?
I have used pkg_add -r to install postgresql-server and
postgresql-client, both installed sucessfully, I've got server and
client binaries and libraries but no configuration files for the
server.
Does the package ass
Hi all,
I've migrated a server to pkgng and had some problem with
mail/dovecot2-pigeonhole that install files in (at least) same docdir as
mail/dovecot2.
I saw this is a problem that can occur with pkgng, but did not find any
recommandation to workaround this kind of conflict, is there a prefe
On 5 January 2013 05:40, Michael Grünewald wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> thank you for your feedback!
>
> Mark Linimon wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 11:11:54PM +0100, Michael Grünewald wrote:
>>> The PRs used to be listed by portsmon but I recently
>>> noticed they disappeared. [1]
>> portsmon is runn
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:47:06PM +0100, Matthieu Volat wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've migrated a server to pkgng and had some problem with
> mail/dovecot2-pigeonhole that install files in (at least) same docdir as
> mail/dovecot2.
>
> I saw this is a problem that can occur with pkgng, but did not
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 07:30:35PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 20:55:40 +
> Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> > On 18/01/2013 02:57, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> >
> > > a. I understand that my use case is not necessarily pkgng's top
> > >priority. Ultimately requirement 2 is p
On 23/01/2013 05:30, Owen O' Shaughnessy wrote:
Hi Guys,
Wondering if anybody else has tried installing Postgres from
packages?
I have used pkg_add -r to install postgresql-server and
postgresql-client, both installed sucessfully, I've got server and
client binaries and libraries but no configu
> > (current time: Wed 23 Jan 2013 02:43:43 AM UTC) --]
> [-- End of PGP output --]
> [-- The following data is signed --]
> We are on notice that the current ports tree will be soon no longer
> available via CVSup and friends. General consumers of the FreeBSD ports
> tree are being encouraged
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 01:39:29 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:47:06PM +0100, Matthieu Volat wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've migrated a server to pkgng and had some problem with
> > mail/dovecot2-pigeonhole that install files in (at least) same docdir as
> > mail/dov
30 matches
Mail list logo
