Question about depends

2013-01-06 Thread Alexander Yerenkow
Hello all. Update for nss and ca root produced rebuild of all packages in my poudriere :) Isn't it so necessary? Maybe there should be new type of dependency introduced - like, INFO_DEPENDS, means that no rebuilld of any depended packages required, they all only use some info from that package. Is

Re: emulators/virtualbox-ose failing to build, 8.2-p9 on amd64

2013-01-06 Thread Matthew Pounsett
On 2013/01/06, at 02:48, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: > Looks like your libsdl version is either very old or too new. Could you > please check which libsdl version you have installed? 1.2.15-_2,2. It's the current ports version (as of this afternoon when I updated my ports tree). ___

Re: Using http mirrors

2013-01-06 Thread Simon L. B. Nielsen
On 5 January 2013 11:14, Chris Rees wrote: > Hi all, > > The submitter of ports/174427 tells me that using http for mirrors is > faster, due to the lack of authentication etc. > > I'm not convinced that the speed difference is huge, but can anyone > think of any reasons not to apply this patch? I

LLVM 3.2: official stable port is still LLVM 3.1. Basesystem missing important LLVM pieces!

2013-01-06 Thread O. Hartmann
While working with an OpenCL port that is depending on LLVM 3.2, I feel very uncomfortable haveng to have devel/llvm-devel installed while the official release of LLVM is 3.2. The port devel/llvm is still the older 3.1. Is this going to be changed? I guess it must be synchronized with FreeBSD 9.X's

Re: LLVM 3.2: official stable port is still LLVM 3.1. Basesystem missing important LLVM pieces!

2013-01-06 Thread Erik Cederstrand
Den 06/01/2013 kl. 13.55 skrev O. Hartmann : > While FreeBSD's > base system already has LLVM/CLANG, it is missing some important LLVM > pieces, like llvm-config and others. llvm-config is a build dependency that spits out some lib paths that you can just hard-code for FreeBSD. So what in "other

Re: LLVM 3.2: official stable port is still LLVM 3.1. Basesystem missing important LLVM pieces!

2013-01-06 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2013-01-06 13:55, O. Hartmann wrote: While working with an OpenCL port that is depending on LLVM 3.2, I feel very uncomfortable haveng to have devel/llvm-devel installed while the official release of LLVM is 3.2. Please prod the port maintainer (Brooks) to update the llvm port instead. I ha

Re: LLVM 3.2: official stable port is still LLVM 3.1. Basesystem missing important LLVM pieces!

2013-01-06 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2013-01-06 15:16, Erik Cederstrand wrote: ... I think the real problem is that LLVM and the related tools are build in one go, so you can't easily build llvm-config and others for the base version of LLVM. Well, it would be easy enough to build llvm-config, but what should its output be?

graphics/OpenEXR & gcc 4.6.3 ISSUE error: 'memset' was not declared in this scope

2013-01-06 Thread awarecons
libtool: compile: g++46 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../config -D_THREAD_SAFE -I/usr/local/include/OpenEXR -I.. -I../config -O2 -pipe -march=pentium4 -mtune=pentium4 -Wno-error -w -pipe -O2 -pipe -march=pentium4 -mtune=pentium4 -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc46 -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -pipe -march=pen

Re: Using http mirrors

2013-01-06 Thread Chris Rees
On 6 January 2013 12:13, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote: > On 5 January 2013 11:14, Chris Rees wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The submitter of ports/174427 tells me that using http for mirrors is >> faster, due to the lack of authentication etc. >> >> I'm not convinced that the speed difference is huge, but

Re: graphics/OpenEXR & gcc 4.6.3 ISSUE error: 'memset' was not declared in this scope

2013-01-06 Thread John Marino
On 1/6/2013 16:03, awarecons wrote: `/usr/ports/graphics/OpenEXR/work/openexr-1.7.0/IlmImf' gmake: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/OpenEXR. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/OpenEXR. Gcc 4.2+ works, but graphics/ilmbase should be compiled wit

Re: LLVM 3.2: official stable port is still LLVM 3.1. Basesystem missing important LLVM pieces!

2013-01-06 Thread O. Hartmann
Am 01/06/13 15:52, schrieb Dimitry Andric: > On 2013-01-06 13:55, O. Hartmann wrote: >> While working with an OpenCL port that is depending on LLVM 3.2, I feel >> very uncomfortable haveng to have devel/llvm-devel installed while the >> official release of LLVM is 3.2. > > Please prod the port mai

Re: LLVM 3.2: official stable port is still LLVM 3.1. Basesystem missing important LLVM pieces!

2013-01-06 Thread O. Hartmann
Am 01/06/13 15:57, schrieb Dimitry Andric: > On 2013-01-06 15:16, Erik Cederstrand wrote: > ... >> I think the real problem is that LLVM and the related tools are build >> in one go, so you can't easily build llvm-config and others for the >> base version of LLVM. > > Well, it would be easy enough

Re: LLVM 3.2: official stable port is still LLVM 3.1. Basesystem missing important LLVM pieces!

2013-01-06 Thread O. Hartmann
Am 01/06/13 15:52, schrieb Dimitry Andric: > On 2013-01-06 13:55, O. Hartmann wrote: >> While working with an OpenCL port that is depending on LLVM 3.2, I feel >> very uncomfortable haveng to have devel/llvm-devel installed while the >> official release of LLVM is 3.2. > > Please prod the port mai

Re: LLVM 3.2: official stable port is still LLVM 3.1. Basesystem missing important LLVM pieces!

2013-01-06 Thread David Chisnall
On 6 Jan 2013, at 12:55, O. Hartmann wrote: > Having a crippled LLVM aboard AND the need having installed a port is a > kind of none-sense. Why should I install port devel/llvm to have a > working LLVM backend? The issue is the same as the issue for anything in the FreeBSD base system, which is:

Re: LLVM 3.2: official stable port is still LLVM 3.1. Basesystem missing important LLVM pieces!

2013-01-06 Thread O. Hartmann
Am 01/06/13 17:49, schrieb David Chisnall: > On 6 Jan 2013, at 12:55, O. Hartmann wrote: > >> Having a crippled LLVM aboard AND the need having installed a port is a >> kind of none-sense. Why should I install port devel/llvm to have a >> working LLVM backend? > > The issue is the same as the iss

kde4 errors and no .xsession-errors file!

2013-01-06 Thread David Southwell
Hi I cannot find a .xession-errors file - what turns it off or on? I need to find out what is going wrong. Kde4 is not loading Thanks David -- David Southwell ARPS AFIAP Photographic Arts Trained & experienced competition judge, mentor, trainer, lecturer, Advanced digital techniques, internati

Re: emulators/virtualbox-ose failing to build, 8.2-p9 on amd64

2013-01-06 Thread Matthew Pounsett
On 2013/01/06, at 04:46, Matthew Pounsett wrote: > > On 2013/01/06, at 02:48, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: > >> Looks like your libsdl version is either very old or too new. Could you >> please check which libsdl version you have installed? > > 1.2.15-_2,2. It's the current ports version (as of t

Re: emulators/virtualbox-ose failing to build, 8.2-p9 on amd64

2013-01-06 Thread Bernhard Fröhlich
Great. Thanks for reporting your results. Am 06.01.2013 20:23 schrieb "Matthew Pounsett" : > > On 2013/01/06, at 04:46, Matthew Pounsett wrote: > > > > > On 2013/01/06, at 02:48, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: > > > >> Looks like your libsdl version is either very old or too new. Could you > >> please c

Re: LLVM 3.2: official stable port is still LLVM 3.1. Basesystem missing important LLVM pieces!

2013-01-06 Thread Chris Rees
On 6 Jan 2013 14:57, "Dimitry Andric" wrote: > > On 2013-01-06 15:16, Erik Cederstrand wrote: > ... > >> I think the real problem is that LLVM and the related tools are build in one go, so you can't easily build llvm-config and others for the base version of LLVM. > > > Well, it would be easy enou

Re: LLVM 3.2: official stable port is still LLVM 3.1. Basesystem missing important LLVM pieces!

2013-01-06 Thread Erik Cederstrand
Den 06/01/2013 kl. 18.25 skrev "O. Hartmann" : >> In contrast, LLVM changes the ABI (and API!) significantly between point >> releases. We therefore don't want to encourage anything outside of the base >> system to link against these libraries, because doing so would prevent us >> from importi

Re: FreeBSD wiki offline for a bit

2013-01-06 Thread Simon L. B. Nielsen
Hey, tl;dr Wiki is back, and everybody with account need to reset their password. On 4 January 2013 22:38, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote: > Due to a security issue in the moinmoin wiki software, the FreeBSD > wiki will be offline for a bit. I do not yet know if the issue > actually has been exploite

LDAP Account Manager

2013-01-06 Thread Vasiliy P. Melnik
please update my port http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=175075 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: LLVM 3.2: official stable port is still LLVM 3.1. Basesystem missing important LLVM pieces!

2013-01-06 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2013-01-06 21:38, Erik Cederstrand wrote: Den 06/01/2013 kl. 18.25 skrev "O. Hartmann" : In contrast, LLVM changes the ABI (and API!) significantly between point releases. We therefore don't want to encourage anything outside of the base system to link against these libraries, because doin

Re: kde4 errors and no .xsession-errors file!

2013-01-06 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
David Southwell writes: > I cannot find a .xession-errors file - what turns it off or on? > > I need to find out what is going wrong. > > Kde4 is not loading How are you starting KDE? If you're using startx, you just need to redirect startkde's output to .xsession-errors. __