Hi,
could a ports committer take ports/173531 pr, please? It is unassigned for
over a month, now.
Thank you very much!
--
Kind regards
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Marco,
Marco Bröder wrote on 16.12.2012 13:52:
Hi,
could a ports committer take ports/173531 pr, please? It is unassigned for
over a month, now.
Thank you very much!
Please review patch attached. I changed some things in your patch:
- using OPTIONSFILE instead of UNIQUENAME (it's common p
Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote on 16.12.2012 14:59:
Hi Marco,
Marco Bröder wrote on 16.12.2012 13:52:
Hi,
could a ports committer take ports/173531 pr, please? It is unassigned
for
over a month, now.
Thank you very much!
Please review patch attached. I changed some things in your patch:
- using
On Sunday, December 16, 2012 15:07:48 Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
> Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote on 16.12.2012 14:59:
> > Hi Marco,
> >
> > Marco Bröder wrote on 16.12.2012 13:52:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> could a ports committer take ports/173531 pr, please? It is unassigned
> >> for
> >> over a month, n
Jason E. Hale wrote on 16.12.2012 15:13:
On Sunday, December 16, 2012 15:07:48 Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote on 16.12.2012 14:59:
Hi Marco,
Marco Bröder wrote on 16.12.2012 13:52:
Hi,
could a ports committer take ports/173531 pr, please? It is unassigned
for
over a m
On 16.12.2012 12:25, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
> Jason E. Hale wrote on 16.12.2012 15:13:
>> On Sunday, December 16, 2012 15:07:48 Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
>>> Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote on 16.12.2012 14:59:
Hi Marco,
Marco Bröder wrote on 16.12.2012 13:52:
> Hi,
>
>
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
On 19/11/2012 08:16, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Given the incessant focus on everything using Subversion now (please do
not get me started, it will be like arguing with a brick wall), I'd like
to know what the plan is for minimising the number of dependencies.
The present subversion **package** on t
On 16 December 2012 10:51, David Demelier wrote:
> We should write a snup tool similar to csup, a bootstrap tool that depends
> on nothing and can fetch both src/ ports/ and doc/ repositories with
> branches support.
Absolutely. If you want to help just
svn checkout svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/us
On 16/12/2012 16:55, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 16 December 2012 10:51, David Demelier wrote:
We should write a snup tool similar to csup, a bootstrap tool that depends
on nothing and can fetch both src/ ports/ and doc/ repositories with
branches support.
Absolutely. If you want to help just
svn c
On 16 December 2012 11:02, David Demelier wrote:
>> Absolutely. If you want to help just
>> svn checkout svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/user/des/svnsup
>> and start hacking!
>>
> Oh really great, didn't know a project like that started!
It is started, but stalled: someone needs to take up the lead
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.3 20121208 (prerelease) (FreeBSD Ports Collection)
configure:4043: $? = 0
configure:4032: gcc47 -V >&5
gcc47: error: unrecognized command line option '-V'
gcc47: fatal error: no input files
compilation terminated.
configure:4043: $? = 1
configure:4032: gcc47 -qve
The current Bash-4.2 in the ports is only current to patch level 37.
Now that the port freeze is over, can the port be updated to level 39
which is the current level?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
_
13 matches
Mail list logo
