On 3 November 2012 17:23, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
> linrename is marked DEPRECATED. I'd like to reinstall it
> as well as /reed/ ...
Linrename was undeprecated on Friday and updated to 2.22 at the same time.
I've tried to update it to 2.22.1, but the file isn't on the
MASTER_SITES and I haven't
from David Naylor :
> Hi List,
> # Executive Summary
> Over the past years I have been maintaining the wine-fbsd64 port (see
> http://mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 for more). The port itself effectively does
> static linking (it bundles all the libraries wine needs) with scripts to
> bootstrap the
On 4 November 2012 11:16, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> from David Naylor :
>
>> Hi List,
>
>> # Executive Summary
>
>> Over the past years I have been maintaining the wine-fbsd64 port (see
>> http://mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 for more). The port itself effectively does
>> static linking (it bundles all
On 11/04/12 21:31, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 4 November 2012 11:16, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> from David Naylor :
>>
>>> Hi List,
>>> # Executive Summary
>>> Over the past years I have been maintaining the wine-fbsd64 port (see
>>> http://mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 for more). The port itself effective
On 11/3/2012 1:00 PM, Martin Gignac wrote:
>> Curious, where did you read about this feature? Would be good to make it
>> more clear how to enable.
>
> At the bottom of the following web page:
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSDPackageBuildingComparison
>
> One of the listed strengths of Poudriere
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
> wrote:
> > linrename is marked DEPRECATED. I'd like to
> reinstall it
> > as well as /reed/ ...
>
> Linrename was undeprecated on Friday and updated to 2.22 at
> the same time.
>
> I've tried to update it to 2.22.1, but the file isn't on
> the
> MASTER_SITES and I haven't investigated any
On 11/02/12 06:21, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> On 2012-Oct-31, 12:41, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote:
>> On 10/31/12 11:55, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
>>> On 2012-Oct-31, 11:28, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote:
>>
New diff[0], undoing some of the earlier changes even though portlint
complains:
portlint
On 4 November 2012 14:43, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
>
>
>> wrote:
>
>> > linrename is marked DEPRECATED. I'd like to
>> reinstall it
>> > as well as /reed/ ...
>
>>
>> Linrename was undeprecated on Friday and updated to 2.22 at
>> the same time.
>>
>> I've tried to update it to 2.22.1, but the file
Hi!
As there were a few problems with vlc 2.0.3 I'd like people to test
the 2.0.4 update before I commit it:
http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/vlc-2.0.4-001.patch
I don't expect new issues but better be safe than sorry...
Thanx! :)
Juergen
PS: Here are the changes since 2.0
On 11/04/12 11:19, Juergen Lock wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As there were a few problems with vlc 2.0.3 I'd like people to test
> the 2.0.4 update before I commit it:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/vlc-2.0.4-001.patch
>
> I don't expect new issues but better be safe than sorry...
>
> Than
On 04-11-2012 18:19, Juergen Lock wrote:
Hi!
As there were a few problems with vlc 2.0.3 I'd like people to test
the 2.0.4 update before I commit it:
http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/vlc-2.0.4-001.patch
[..]
PS: Here are the changes since 2.0.3 as noted in vlc-2.0.4/NEWS:
Chang
On 04-11-2012 18:19, Juergen Lock wrote:
Hi!
As there were a few problems with vlc 2.0.3 I'd like people to test
the 2.0.4 update before I commit it:
http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/vlc-2.0.4-001.patch
I don't expect new issues but better be safe than sorry...
On my box (10.0-a
Juergen Lock wrote:
> As there were a few problems with vlc 2.0.3 I'd like people to test
> the 2.0.4 update before I commit it:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/vlc-2.0.4-001.patch
Thanks.
1. The OPUS option has no description.
2. Doesn't configure for me with NCURSES:
checking
On 11/04/12 11:19, Juergen Lock wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As there were a few problems with vlc 2.0.3 I'd like people to test
> the 2.0.4 update before I commit it:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/vlc-2.0.4-001.patch
>
> I don't expect new issues but better be safe than sorry...
Did I do
On 11/04/12 11:19, Juergen Lock wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As there were a few problems with vlc 2.0.3 I'd like people to test
> the 2.0.4 update before I commit it:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/vlc-2.0.4-001.patch
>
> I don't expect new issues but better be safe than sorry...
>
> Than
Am 30.10.2012 09:28, schrieb O. Hartmann:
> Am 10/29/12 14:57, schrieb Rainer Hurling:
>> Am 29.10.2012 14:19 (UTC+1) schrieb O. Hartmann:
>>> Hello world.
>>>
>>> With the most recent FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 r242305, CLAN
>>> buildworld and with libc++/c++11 compiled, I can not start the
>>> A
In article <20121104203619.49647...@fabiankeil.de> you write:
>Juergen Lock wrote:
>
>> As there were a few problems with vlc 2.0.3 I'd like people to test
>> the 2.0.4 update before I commit it:
>>
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/vlc-2.0.4-001.patch
>
>Thanks.
>
>1. The OPUS option ha
In article <5096c704.1090...@gmail.com> you write:
>On 11/04/12 11:19, Juergen Lock wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> As there were a few problems with vlc 2.0.3 I'd like people to test
>> the 2.0.4 update before I commit it:
>>
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/vlc-2.0.4-001.patch
>>
>> I don't expec
On 11/04/12 16:29, Juergen Lock wrote:
> Can you double-check the patch applied completely, make -V PKGNAME
> should return vlc-2.0.4,3 and PORTVERSION in the Makefile should
> have been patched to 2.0.4 .
>
> The other problems people found are real tho, I've put a new
> update here:
>
>
I just installed this to help me with some of my programming (got sick
of using online ones), only to find it won't run at all. There is no
error, but this is what I got from truss:
v\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\n\0\0\0"...,4096) = 1428 (0x594)
read(3,0x80c9ba02c,4096) ERR#35 'Resource temporari
Hi all,
On stable/8 most current updated system with most recent version of
pkgng from git checked out I am getting the following warning being
treated as an error. I don't have further time to look into ATM but if
this catches someones attention to look at it further it would be
appreciated.
st
Em Ter, 2012-10-30 às 11:47 -0300, Lucas Saliés Brum escreveu:
> Em 30/10/2012 11:39, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov escreveu:
> > Lucas Saliés Brum wrote on 30.10.2012 18:32:
> >>
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Em 30/10/2012 11:23, Chris Rees escreveu:
> >>> pkg_delete -f `
> Thanks. I've updated the text to make it more clear that it's optional.
I do believe that stated this new way it would have prompted me to
scour through the configuration file for the knob.
> It's not on by default yet, as there are some ports that get rebuilt
> every time.
OK, good to know.
On 2012-Oct-28 21:00:30 -0500, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote:
>I am trying an upgrade to audacity (1.x to 2.x) but it has crapped out;
>nothing in updating about audacity issues.
>
>http://pastebin.com/WxPvgKXf
I have no trouble building audio/audacity on 8.3/amd64 with:
_OPTIONS_READ=audacity-2.0.2
_FI
25 matches
Mail list logo
