On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Martin Gignac wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I currently have some 8.2 and 8.3 servers which I cannot upgrade to
> 9.0 yet. I am looking at building packages with Poudriere and pkgng
> for these 8.2/8.3 servers.
>
> My question is this: do I need to create separate 8.2 and 8.3 ja
Hi Ruslan,
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> is there any possibility to also add something like
> USE_FORTRAN_BUILD=[yes|g77|ifort] to make fortran build dependency
> only? Many ports will benefit from this - anything, that depend on
> math/py-numpy for example.
we definitely c
On 2012-Oct-31, 12:41, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote:
> On 10/31/12 11:55, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> > On 2012-Oct-31, 11:28, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote:
>
> >> New diff[0], undoing some of the earlier changes even though portlint
> >> complains:
> >>
> >> portlint ~/port-maintenance/tk85/
> >> WARN: Makefile:
> A package built on 8.2 will continue to work on 8.3. The only thing
> that may not work are ports that require kernel sources to build or
> install kernel modules.
Thanks for that clarification. I'll have to pay special attention then
to ports that do so.
-Martin
__
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done.
make_index: cfv-1.18.3: no entry for /usr/ports/security/py-fchksum
Committers on the hook:
ak bf crees lwhsu olgeni pawel rm
Most recent SVN update was:
Updating '.':
Udevel/jenkins/distinfo
Udevel/jenkins/Makefil
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 12:53:06PM +, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> INDEX build failed with errors:
> Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done.
> make_index: cfv-1.18.3: no entry for /usr/ports/security/py-fchksum
>
> Committers on the hook:
> ak bf crees lwhsu olgeni pawel rm
>
> Most recent SVN u
On 11/02/12 06:21, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> This won't apply, either. Could you provide a diff as dumped by svn diff
> in tk85's directory?
>
from within /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/tk85 on the "original"
root@alex-laptop#> svn diff Makefile
Index: Makefile
=
On 1 November 2012 23:27, Da Rock
wrote:
> On 11/01/12 17:19, Anders Troback wrote:
>>
>> I do not use FreeBSD any more (I feel in love with
>> OpenBSD:-)) so please remove me as maintainer of the science/gramps
>> port.
>>
> I can take it over unless someone else is better suited (and actually us
On 11/02/12 09:27, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 1 November 2012 23:27, Da Rock
> wrote:
>> On 11/01/12 17:19, Anders Troback wrote:
>>>
>>> I do not use FreeBSD any more (I feel in love with
>>> OpenBSD:-)) so please remove me as maintainer of the science/gramps
>>> port.
>>>
>> I can take it over unle
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi,
unfortunately I have the same problem. A lot of fetch and checksum errors. I
have set RESOLV_CONF=/etc/resolv.conf in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf,
resolv.conf is copied to the poudriere jail and manual fetching of the ports is
working.
On every run of poudriere bulk different ports are fa
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
Hello Sir/Mam:
Happy to contact you !
We would like to introudce our company.Our company is a large scale
pertrochemical enterprise with synthetic rubber as the main product. We
could supply SBR 1502 and 1712. It is manufactured by SINOPEC YANGZI.
The following is the SBR quotation :
* SB
Hi!
Gerald Pfeifer wrote on 02.11.2012 13:26:
Hi Ruslan,
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
is there any possibility to also add something like
USE_FORTRAN_BUILD=[yes|g77|ifort] to make fortran build dependency
only? Many ports will benefit from this - anything, that depend on
mat
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote on 02.11.2012 23:18:
Hi!
Gerald Pfeifer wrote on 02.11.2012 13:26:
Hi Ruslan,
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
is there any possibility to also add something like
USE_FORTRAN_BUILD=[yes|g77|ifort] to make fortran build dependency
only? Many ports will
Hello, Baptiste.
You wrote 10 октября 2012 г., 17:44:21:
BD> Make sure to read UPDATING (from ports) to correctly migrate your system or
find
BD> instruction to make your system still running with legacy pkg_install tools.
Did somebody update nanobsd scripts? ;-)
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Sereb
On 11/2/2012 11:52 AM, Wolfgang Riegler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> unfortunately I have the same problem. A lot of fetch and checksum errors. I
> have set RESOLV_CONF=/etc/resolv.conf in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf,
> resolv.conf is copied to the poudriere jail and manual fetching of the ports
> is wor
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 2 ноября 2012 г., 23:24:28:
BD>> Make sure to read UPDATING (from ports) to correctly migrate your system
or find
BD>> instruction to make your system still running with legacy pkg_install
tools.
LS> Did somebody update nanobsd scripts? ;-)
Simple replacing "pkg_add" with
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 12:41:31AM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Lev.
> You wrote 2 ноября 2012 г., 23:24:28:
>
> BD>> Make sure to read UPDATING (from ports) to correctly migrate your system
> or find
> BD>> instruction to make your system still running with legacy pkg_install
> tools.
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 12:41:31AM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Lev.
> You wrote 2 ноября 2012 г., 23:24:28:
>
> BD>> Make sure to read UPDATING (from ports) to correctly migrate your system
> or find
> BD>> instruction to make your system still running with legacy pkg_install
> tools.
On Nov 2, 2012, at 1:10 AM, Martin Gignac wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently discovered Poudriere and have begun using it to build my
> own local pkgng PACKAGESITE for my FreeBSD 8 and 9 servers.
>
> Based on information I read on the web I was under the impression that
> whenever a new bulk build
The mailing lists don't seem to be a good place to send bugs
and get attention, and I've found a few that I want to report
and have in a bug system somewhere. Should I use gnats? Thanks.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
On 2 November 2012 21:53, Adam McDougall wrote:
> The mailing lists don't seem to be a good place to send bugs
> and get attention, and I've found a few that I want to report
> and have in a bug system somewhere.
> Should I use gnats?
yes please. Log then as "bin" category for now (we really sho
On 11/2/2012 9:56 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 2 November 2012 21:53, Adam McDougall wrote:
The mailing lists don't seem to be a good place to send bugs
and get attention, and I've found a few that I want to report
and have in a bug system somewhere.
Should I use gnats?
yes please. Log then as "b
On 11/2/2012 9:39 PM, Adam McDougall wrote:
> On 11/2/2012 9:56 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 2 November 2012 21:53, Adam McDougall wrote:
>>> The mailing lists don't seem to be a good place to send bugs
>>> and get attention, and I've found a few that I want to report
>>> and have in a bug system
On 2 November 2012 23:55, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 11/2/2012 9:39 PM, Adam McDougall wrote:
>> On 11/2/2012 9:56 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>> On 2 November 2012 21:53, Adam McDougall wrote:
The mailing lists don't seem to be a good place to send bugs
and get attention, and I've found a f
26 matches
Mail list logo
