E-Leave System For UBS Payroll User
eleave in a nutshell* Staff login to view leave balance & apply leave
* Superior is notified on new application via e-mail or SMS
* Superior login to approve or reject leave application
* Staff is notified on application status via e-mail or SMS
YOUR ULTIMAT
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 08:38:01PM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
> On 2012-10-09 14:27, Pierre DAVID wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > would anybody help me to bring these ports in final shape such as
> > they could be included in the ports tree?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > Pierre David
>
> Hi David,
>
I migrated my ports to pkgng on one machine but I'm getting a conflict
between perl5.12 and perl5.14 because they install files to the same
location, and are required by other packages: e.g. gtk-2.24.6_2 requires
perl-5.14.2_2 but glib depends on perl-5.12.4_4.
I've force-uninstalled perl5.12
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:31:37AM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
> I migrated my ports to pkgng on one machine but I'm getting a conflict
> between perl5.12 and perl5.14 because they install files to the same
> location, and are required by other packages: e.g. gtk-2.24.6_2 requires
> perl-5.14.2_2 b
On 11/10/2012 11:44, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
You have messed up your system long ago, you should have only one
single perl on your system, so before completing your conversion you
have to make sure you are on a sane system, meaning the perl5.12 ->
perl5.14 conversion has been done correctly f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/11/2012 16:08, Barbara wrote:
> due to security problems
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19909106
Yes, I will update it to 16.0.1 today, one way or another.
Florian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD)
Comment:
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:20 PM, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> I receive since two days on my FreeBSD 10 boxes this message when
> updating the /usr/ports tree. What is this supposed to mean?
>
> The error is occuring from the university's net as well as from my
> private provider, so I think it is somethi
OLÁ, VENHO ATRAVÉS DESTE E-MAIL APRESENTAR O DATA STUDIO:
PARA CONSULTAS DE ORÇAMENTOS DE JINGLES, SPOTS, VINHETAS, LOCUÇÕES E TAMBÉM
CONVERSÃO DE VINIL E CASSETE PARA CD E VHS PARA DVD, BASTA ENTRAR EM CONTATO
POR ESTE E-MAIL OU PELO SITE.
QUEM TIVER INTERESSE TENHO UM PORTIFÓLIO DE AUDIO NO EN
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Bruce Cran wrote:
> On 11/10/2012 11:44, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>
>> You have messed up your system long ago, you should have only one single
>> perl on your system, so before completing your conversion you have to make
>> sure you are on a sane system, meaning
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:33 AM, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman)
wrote:
> Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>
>> I have made suggests on what to do. Please contact with A.J. Kehoe IV.
>> I suggested him to create a team to work on get rid of HAVE_GNOME. He
>> even has created a wiki page about it at ht
As the maintaner of this port, I'll be updating it soon, as the new
version is currently in rc.
I'd like to clean up this sed script applied to a makefile, but I
don't know how much of it might be requred. For reference, the port
builds and works with only the last one - removal of "-l dl".
Are an
As the maintaner of this port, I'll be updating it soon, as the new
version is currently in rc.
I'd like to clean up this sed script applied to a makefile, but I
don't know how much of it might be requred. For reference, the port
builds and works with only the last one - removal of "-l dl".
Are an
I have made changes to ports/Mk/bsd.gcc.mk that allow the addition of
"USE_GCC=any" to a port's Makefile, and then committed that change to
various ports. In most (but not all!) cases this will tell the port
"build with gcc instead of clang" (*) .
Why not USE_GCC ?= any for the poor guys li
> On 10/11/2012 16:08, Barbara wrote:
>> due to security problems
>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19909106
>
> Yes, I will update it to 16.0.1 today, one way or another.
>
> Florian
Thanks, that was fast!
For who is concerned, it seems that Seamonkey is affected as well.
http://www.mozilla
15 matches
Mail list logo