Hi Gerald,
is there any possibility to also add something like
USE_FORTRAN_BUILD=[yes|g77|ifort] to make fortran build dependency only?
Many ports will benefit from this - anything, that depend on
math/py-numpy for example.
--
Regards,
Ruslan
Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
__
What is the method in a repository of pkg there to split packages for
difference minor version? At present PACKAGESSITE set to
http://pkg.freebsd.org/${ABI}/latest, where $ABI forming URL on 9.0 or
9.1/amd64 into http://pkg.freebsd.org/freebsd:9:x86:64/latest/
How it is possible to specify nec
devel/pcre fails on ia64 portscluster because defaults
include JIT:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ia64-errorlogs/e.9.20120916093935/pcre-8.31.log
This patch fixes it. I checked
it on my own ia64 boxes:
Index: Makefile
===
-
On 09/17/12 11:12, Oleg Ginzburg wrote:
> What is the method in a repository of pkg there to split packages for
> difference minor version? At present PACKAGESSITE set to
> http://pkg.freebsd.org/${ABI}/latest, where $ABI forming URL on 9.0 or
> 9.1/amd64 into http://pkg.freebsd.org/freebsd:9:x
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .)
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsol
Anton Shterenlikht wrote on 17.09.2012 15:08:
From owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org Mon Sep 17 11:43:21 2012
USE_FORTRAN_BUILD=[yes|g77|ifort] to make fortran build dependency only?
ifort?
Is there Intel fortran for FreeBSD?
Anton
lang/ifc according to bsd.gcc.mk
--
Regards
From owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org Mon Sep 17 11:43:21 2012
USE_FORTRAN_BUILD=[yes|g77|ifort] to make fortran build dependency
only?
ifort?
Is there Intel fortran for FreeBSD?
Anton
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http:/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
i'm running freebsd-9.0
the update libreoffice from ports to 3.5.6.2 hangs here:
internal build errors:
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.6.2/vcl/prj
after:
/usr/local/b
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:12:35AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> devel/pcre fails on ia64 portscluster because defaults
> include JIT:
>
> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ia64-errorlogs/e.9.20120916093935/pcre-8.31.log
>
> This patch fixes it. I checked
> it on my own ia64 boxes:
>
>
Hi!
I installed VLC 2.0.3 on FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 #0 (clang) and it works very good but
I don't know how installed plugins for Opera and Firefox. I search for
vlcplugin.so as I had on earlier version (1.?) but I didn't find it.
Please help me.
Thanks in advance.
Mitja
http://jpgmag.com/peo
It was recently posted on,
http://blogs.freebsdish.org/portmgr/2012/09/01/change-to-the-header-in-ports-makefiles/
that we would adopt a new header for the ports Makefiles. The initial
discussion seemed to show enough support for the idea of completely
stripping the header, leaving only the $FreeB
It was recently posted on,
http://blogs.freebsdish.org/portmgr/2012/09/01/change-to-the-header-in-ports-makefiles/
that we would adopt a new header for the ports Makefiles. The initial
discussion seemed to show enough support for the idea of completely
stripping the header, leaving only the $FreeB
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 04:22:45PM +, Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
[...]
>
> Sometimes, as a result of a repocopy, or changed maintainership, the
> Created By and MAINTAINER is no longer in synchronisation. To avoid
> confusion, the first line can be removed, to ensure only the MAINTAINER
> is cont
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Thomas Abthorpe
wrote:
> It was recently posted on,
> http://blogs.freebsdish.org/portmgr/2012/09/01/change-to-the-header-in-ports-makefiles/
> that we would adopt a new header for the ports Makefiles. The initial
> discussion seemed to show enough support for the
On 09/17/12 11:43, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Thomas Abthorpe
wrote:
It was recently posted on,
http://blogs.freebsdish.org/portmgr/2012/09/01/change-to-the-header-in-ports-makefiles/
that we would adopt a new header for the ports Makefiles. The initial
discussion see
Actually, I see no reason for having JIT in options at all, as it only
provides additional functions, there is no signifficant difference in
size and the port license doesn't change. I have simply enabled it
anywhere besides sparc64 and ia64.
On 17.9.2012 17:25, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon,
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Thomas Abthorpe
> wrote:
>> It was recently posted on,
>> http://blogs.freebsdish.org/portmgr/2012/09/01/change-to-the-header-in-ports-makefiles/
>> that we would adopt a new header for the ports Makefiles.
[ Jeremy Messenger wrote on Mon 17.Sep'12 at 11:59:08 -0500 ]
>
> > IMHO, of course. :)
>
> I don't care if it's IMHO, but dude you are pain in ass already.
>
> > --
> > Freddie Cash
> > fjwc...@gmail.com
What is a pain in the arse are comments like this. We use FreeBSD and people
make decisi
On 09/12/2012 00:42, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 09/11/2012 05:58 AM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
>> Hello guys;
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> ...
>>>
>>> 2012/9/11 Doug Barton :
Now that we have a new version of libxul in the ports tree, any plans of
upgrading swt to take advantage
19 matches
Mail list logo
