[1][USEMAP:top.jpg]
[2][USEMAP:resumen.jpg]
[3][USEMAP:destacado_doble.jpg]
[4][USEMAP:cursos.jpg]
[5][publicidad.jpg]
[netlearning.jpg]
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 08/30/2012 07:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 30, 2012 1:10:24 pm Chris Rees wrote:
> >> On 30 Aug 2012 18:03, "John Baldwin" wrote:
> >>>
>
> I agree with John on all counts here. Further, the idea of a
> self-i
I think this might be related to this thread, so I'm
posting it as a follow-up ...
On some FreeBSD 8.x systems, I get the following error:
===> Deinstalling for security/ca_root_nss
readlink: illegal option -- f
usage: readlink [-n] [file ...]
It seems bsd.port.mk is trying to use /usr/bin/read
Hello.
As far as I can see, one can create pkg repositories with poudriere.
However, could I run it in jail?
If I can't, can I create pkg-ng packages just with "make package", place
it somewhere and use as a local repository?
I just want to keep my host system absolutely clean (no packages, no
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 02:38:33PM +0400, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> Hello.
> As far as I can see, one can create pkg repositories with poudriere.
> However, could I run it in jail?
> If I can't, can I create pkg-ng packages just with "make package", place
> it somewhere and use as a local reposi
On Friday, August 31, 2012 5:59:10 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton wrote:
> > On 08/30/2012 07:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Thursday, August 30, 2012 1:10:24 pm Chris Rees wrote:
> > >> On 30 Aug 2012 18:03, "John Baldwin" wrote:
> > >>>
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 08:10:50AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, August 31, 2012 5:59:10 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton wrote:
> > > On 08/30/2012 07:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, August 30, 2012 1:10:24 pm Chris Re
Hello,
This is just to share with you that soon after the official 1.0
release of pkgng we now have basic plugins support in pkgng's
development branch.
I've written a small handbook which tries to shed some light about
plugins in pkgng, which could be useful to you in case you want to
develop a
On 31 Aug 2012 13:15, "John Baldwin" wrote:
>
> On Friday, August 31, 2012 5:59:10 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton wrote:
> > > On 08/30/2012 07:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, August 30, 2012 1:10:24 pm Chris Rees wrote:
> > >
Hello.
Could I ask one stupid question?
So, I've installed pkg from ports. Added WITH_PKGNG=yes to make.conf.
Built some packages with "make package-recursive" to use as common
repository for several systems.
Now if I wish to update pkg, what should I do?
So, for example, I'll make portsnap fet
On 31 August 2012 15:26, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> Hello.
> Could I ask one stupid question?
> So, I've installed pkg from ports. Added WITH_PKGNG=yes to make.conf.
> Built some packages with "make package-recursive" to use as common
> repository for several systems.
>
> Now if I wish to update p
On Aug 30, 2012, at 11:56 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 30/08/2012 22:44, John Nielsen wrote:
>> After dialog(1) exits the script has a list of packages to mark as
>> automatic. Is there a non-SQL way to efficiently get the inverse?
>> I.e. the set { all_packages - new_automatic_package_list } ?
Marin Atanasov Nikolov wrote:
> This is just to share with you that soon after the official 1.0
> release of pkgng we now have basic plugins support in pkgng's
> development branch.
> [...]
> It's not perfect or covering everything, but it will give you a quick
> start though :)
How about the abi
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:27:09PM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> Marin Atanasov Nikolov wrote:
> > This is just to share with you that soon after the official 1.0
> > release of pkgng we now have basic plugins support in pkgng's
> > development branch.
> > [...]
> > It's not perfect or covering e
Hi,
we are looking for people using fusefs-ntfs. Bryan updated fusefs-ntfs
to the latest version and i have an update for fusefs-libs.
If you use fusefs-ntfs it would be great if you could download the
patches at
http://people.freebsd.org/~bdrewery/patch-sysutils-fusefs-ntfs-2012.1.15.txt
http:/
On 31-08-2012 14:22, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 08:10:50AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Friday, August 31, 2012 5:59:10 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton wrote:
I agree with John on all counts here. Further, the
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:27:09PM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
>> Marin Atanasov Nikolov wrote:
>> > This is just to share with you that soon after the official 1.0
>> > release of pkgng we now have basic plugins support in pkgng's
>> > devel
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On 31-08-2012 14:22, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 08:10:50AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> On Friday, August 31, 2012 5:59:10 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton wr
Synopsis: [PATCH] devel/p5-ParseLex: update to 2.21
Responsible-Changed-From-To: pirzyk->freebsd-ports
Responsible-Changed-By: pirzyk
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Aug 31 15:54:54 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I approve this change
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=171053
_
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 08/30/2012 07:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>> > On Thursday, August 30, 2012 1:10:24 pm Chris Rees wrote:
>> >> On 30 Aug 2012 18:03, "John Baldwin" wrote:
>> >>>
>>
>> I
Glen Barber wrote:
>> How about the ability to add new commands to "pkg"?
>> For example something like "pkg cutleaves" via plugins would be cool.
>
> I think 'pkg autoremove' already does this.
Does autoremove show you all the leaves and ask which ones you want
removed? I honestly don't know (an
On 31 August 2012 16:47, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On 31-08-2012 14:22, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 08:10:50AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> On Friday, August 31, 2012 5:59:10 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton wrote:
>>>
On 8/31/2012 11:03 AM, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> Glen Barber wrote:
>>> How about the ability to add new commands to "pkg"?
>>> For example something like "pkg cutleaves" via plugins would be cool.
>>
>> I think 'pkg autoremove' already does this.
>
> Does autoremove show you all the leaves and ask
Thank you, Baptiste and other for your work on pkgng. It's amazing.
I've got local repository up and running in less then an hour.
The only inconvenience is a necessity of bootstrapping clients. I've
just installed pkg*tbz package from ftp.freebsd.org and run pkg2ng. I'm
sure it could be done m
On Friday, August 31, 2012 9:41:13 am Chris Rees wrote:
> On 31 Aug 2012 13:15, "John Baldwin" wrote:
> >
> > On Friday, August 31, 2012 5:59:10 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton wrote:
> > > > On 08/30/2012 07:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > >
Hi,
I think the details of the patch would need to be worked out a bit,
but I think you are on the right track.
I think it would be nice to:
(1) Have deprecation warnings in the legacy pkg_* tools.
If someone types "pkg_add", maybe warn them that
it is deprecated, and they
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:27:14 -0700
Jim Pazarena wrote:
> Which is the recommended way to stay PORT current? portsnap or csup?
> I will switch to portsnap, but it is pretty slow compared to csup.
In normal use portsnap should be much faster than csup.
The initial "portsnap extract" is much slow
On 31 August 2012 09:15, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> No, because it already knows which you installed and which were pulled
> in as dependencies. There's a recent thread on ports@ regarding pkg2ng
> and marking your imported packages as automatic or not.
There is a usecase for looking at all the leaf
On 8/31/2012 10:15 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 31 August 2012 09:15, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>
>> No, because it already knows which you installed and which were pulled
>> in as dependencies. There's a recent thread on ports@ regarding pkg2ng
>> and marking your imported packages as automatic or not
An idea has been floating around for some time, and it was brought up again
on the ports@ mailing list recently, please remove the extraneous header
information from the Makefile, leaving only the $FreeBSD$ id on the first
line.
It is an idea that is long overdue, so from now on, the other fives l
30 matches
Mail list logo
