On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:51:57AM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 06:18:43PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > mail/mutt is much slower on my amd64 and ia64
> > -current boxes after it was updated from 1.4
> > to 1.5. Each keystroke takes few seconds to
> > act. Below i
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:00:39PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 24.07.2012 19:18, schrieb Anton Shterenlikht:
> > mail/mutt is much slower on my amd64 and ia64
> > -current boxes after it was updated from 1.4
> > to 1.5. Each keystroke takes few seconds to
> > act. Below is my mutt 1.5 config
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:00:39PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 24.07.2012 19:18, schrieb Anton Shterenlikht:
> > mail/mutt is much slower on my amd64 and ia64
> > -current boxes after it was updated from 1.4
> > to 1.5. Each keystroke takes few seconds to
> > act. Below is my mutt 1.5 config
Thomas Zander:
> New tarball is available for download:
> http://bsdistfiles.googlecode.com/files/m20120724.tar.bz2
Using the default options, this mplayer works on 7.4-STABLE/amd64
for all my media. No regressions.
(And lavcac3enc is still broken. No improvement there either.)
I don't use me
While rebuilding fetchmail again, I noticed this line
in configure logs:
configure: WARNING: Disabling fetchmailconf: python 2.0 or greater not found
I've got python all right:
# pkg info -xo python
python27-2.7.3_3: lang/python27
#
So what does this mean?
In case it matters, this is on
# u
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:40:50 +0100
Anton Shterenlikht articulated:
> While rebuilding fetchmail again, I noticed this line
> in configure logs:
>
> configure: WARNING: Disabling fetchmailconf: python 2.0 or greater
> not found
>
> I've got python all right:
>
> # pkg info -xo python
> python27-
sindrome writes:
> Linking CXX executable dolphin
> ../../lib/libdolphinprivate.so.5.0.1: undefined reference to
> `KVersionControlPlugin2::staticMetaObject'
For posterity: we've also been contacted in the kde@ mailing list [1],
and are currently tracking it there. It may be the case that the OP
sindrome writes:
> Trying to upgrade kdesdk-4.7.4_1 to 4.8.4 and running into the
> following error. Anyone have an idea?
This seems to come from the same libkonq problems which are currently
blocking your kde4-baseapps upgrade.
___
freebsd-ports@fre
ash...@freebsd.org (Ashish SHUKLA) writes:
> Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
It seems to be running fine here, I've now even switched to GTK3 (I
wonder if there should be an error message if one selected more than one
GUI option).
Gnus from git with the new Emacs also seems to be runn
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:40:50 +0100
Anton Shterenlikht articulated:
> While rebuilding fetchmail again, I noticed this line
> in configure logs:
>=20
> configure: WARNING: Disabling fetchmailconf: python 2.0 or greater
> not found
>=20
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 11:39:07 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> It seems to be running fine here, I've now even switched to GTK3 (I
> wonder if there should be an error message if one selected more than one
> GUI option).
The GUI options use OPTIONS_SINGLE, so the port will error out if more t
It's harmless; just the fetchmail port working around the configure script
so that the proper PYTHON_VERSION is pulled in, rather than whatever the
configure script finds.
If you've got the 'x11' option enabled for the port, fetchmailconf will be
built and installed regardless of that warni
Hi,
What is the proper way to temporarily change an option on
the command line or within a script?
For example, I have a script that builds both dynamic and
static zsh binaries, without user intervention. With the
old options system, the script set "WITH_ZSH_STATIC=true"
when building the port.
The FreeBSD 9.1 schedule has been published,
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.1R/schedule.html. Historically we have
done a Feature Freeze at RC1, we are going to try do it with RC2 this time,
tentatively scheduled for August 3, subject to schedule slippage.
At the time the the Release Engineeri
Hello obrien,
Any plans to update bash-4.2.28 up to patch level 037?
I see we still are on patch level 028.
Regards,
Michael Zoon
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubs
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 05:11:18PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the proper way to temporarily change an option on
> the command line or within a script?
>
> For example, I have a script that builds both dynamic and
> static zsh binaries, without user intervention. With the
> old
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 05:11:18PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > What is the proper way to temporarily change an option on
> > the command line or within a script?
> >
> > For example, I have a script that builds both dynamic and
> > static zsh binaries, withou
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 07:09:48PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 05:11:18PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > What is the proper way to temporarily change an option on
> > > the command line or within a script?
>
> I also tried the other se
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 07:09:48PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 05:11:18PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > > What is the proper way to temporarily change an option on
> > > > the command line or within a
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 05:11:18PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > What is the proper way to temporarily change an option on
> > > the command line or within a script?
> > >
> > > For example, I have a s
On 07/25/2012 08:03, Michael wrote:
> Hello obrien,
>
>
>
> Any plans to update bash-4.2.28 up to patch level 037?
Is there a specific bug fixed that you're interested in?
--
Change is hard.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http:/
On 2012-07-25 20:18, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Oliver Fromme
> wrote:
>>
>> I also tried the other settings you suggested, and none
>> of them works. It's always overridden by the settings
>> that are stored in $PORT_DBDIR.
>>
>> With the old framework, I could over
On 2012-07-25 20:18, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Oliver Fromme
> wrote:
The following diff will restore the old behavior so make.conf and command
params have priority.
(Place the make.conf part after the OPTIONS_FILE_SET part)
Until now I cannot see why the OPTIONS f
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 15:55:28 +0100 (BST)
Anton Shterenlikht articulated:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:40:50 +0100
>Anton Shterenlikht articulated:
>
>> While rebuilding fetchmail again, I noticed this line
>> in configure logs:
>>=20
>> configure: WARNING: Disabling fetchmailconf: python 2.0 or
>> great
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:14:25 -0700
Doug Barton articulated:
> On 07/25/2012 08:03, Michael wrote:
> > Hello obrien,
> >
> > Any plans to update bash-4.2.28 up to patch level 037?
>
> Is there a specific bug fixed that you're interested in?
The short answer would be what the hell difference does
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:24:27PM +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
> On 2012-07-25 20:18, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Oliver Fromme
> > wrote:
>
> The following diff will restore the old behavior so make.conf and command
> params have priority.
> (Place the make.conf part
On 2012-07-26 00:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:24:27PM +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
>> On 2012-07-25 20:18, Scot Hetzel wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Oliver Fromme
>>> wrote:
>>
>> The following diff will restore the old behavior so make.conf and command
>
version? Was it stable/9?
>> FYI, I wasn't able to build it sanely on head. :-(
>
> It's the head: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r236503.
I guess you had installed OpenSSL from ports. ;-)
Now I am able to build it with GCC 4.6:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/libreoff
On 25 July 2012 15:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:24:27PM +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
>> On 2012-07-25 20:18, Scot Hetzel wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Oliver Fromme
>> > wrote:
>>
>> The following diff will restore the old behavior so make.conf and comma
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 07:40:56PM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 25 July 2012 15:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:24:27PM +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
> >> On 2012-07-25 20:18, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Oliver Fromme
> >> > wrote:
> >>
>
On 25 July 2012 21:55, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> You can already do that:
> OPTIONSFILE=/my/path/to/options make config
You can't set specific options on the command line without putting all
of them into a file?
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@fre
On 2012-07-26 06:55, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 07:40:56PM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 25 July 2012 15:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:24:27PM +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
On 2012-07-25 20:18, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 07:22:24AM +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
> On 2012-07-26 06:55, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 07:40:56PM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote:
> >> On 25 July 2012 15:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:24:27PM +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
> >>
Hi all,
We have two problems with devel/pkg-config, the first one is hopefully now
solved, the second one is in the slow way to be solved.
Let's first start with the first one:
1/ since 0.26 devel/pkg-config expects pkg-config and glib2 to be present to be
able to built, and glib2 also depends o
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have two problems with devel/pkg-config, the first one is hopefully now
> solved, the second one is in the slow way to be solved.
>
> Let's first start with the first one:
>
> 1/ since 0.26 devel/pkg-config expects pkg-con
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We have two problems with devel/pkg-config, the first one is hopefully now
>> solved, the second one is in the slow way to be solved.
>>
>> Let's first start with t
On 07/25/2012 23:26, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> Sorry, I meant of course the Makefile of the new devel/pkgconf :)
Actually every file in the port was duplicated. I just fixed it since
this is a pretty important thing to NOT have broken.
--
Change is hard.
___
On 07/25/2012 11:12 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
We just switched devel/pkg-config to devel/pkgconf for that reason (see
UPDATING for instructions)
The content of the files in the new pkgconf port are "doubled up".
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/devel/pkgconf/Makefile?revision=301539&vi
39 matches
Mail list logo
