Re: How to remove erroneous deps from pkgng

2012-07-24 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 08:04:44PM -0400, Jason E. Hale wrote: > On Monday, July 23, 2012 20:50:34 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Here is a plan for pkg-config, I hope it will statisfy everyone. > > > > First we need to get rid of pkg-config, since 0.26 we can't boostrap it > > anymore because it d

Re: lang/php53 dumps core

2012-07-24 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko
drich wrote: php keeps dumping core on some requests. There are days that it dumps core almost continuously. However there are days it works smoothly. Do you use e-accelerator? No. Here is full extension list: Hmmm... you might try moving memcache.so to the top of the list. Impossible -

Re: lang/php53 dumps core

2012-07-24 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko
Olli Hauer wrote: Try starting with an empty extensions.ini and do the following test, if php coredumps it will mostly also cordump on the command line with the following tests. $> php -ie $> php -nme $> php -me Next do the same test with always only one extension enabled. If you got meanw

Re: lang/php53 dumps core

2012-07-24 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko
Reko Turja wrote: From: Volodymyr Kostyrko Rebuilding whole PHP without clang/gcc4.6 (my local settings) dumps core with this backtrace: ... Maybe something like this in /etc/make.conf ..if ${.CURDIR:M*php53*} WITH_DEBUG=YES ..endif ..if ${.CURDIR:M*php5-redis*} WITH_DEBUG=YES ..endif An

Re: lang/php53 dumps core

2012-07-24 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko
Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: On some of my servers php keeps dumping core on some requests. There are days that it dumps core almost continuously. However there are days it works smoothly. FreeBSD kohrah.xim.bz 9.0-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3 #0 r236967: Tue Jun 12 22:25:24 EEST 2012 arc...@k

Re: (semi-)official git mirror of ports svn repo?

2012-07-24 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 00:05:49 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > Do we have a (semi-)official git mirror of the new ports _svn_ repo? > Something either FreeBSD hosted/managed or maintained by prominent ports > developers on github/gitorious/elsewhere? > > I looked at gitorious, github and freebsd.y

Re: [CFT] editors/emacs to 24.1

2012-07-24 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
Hi I missed two diffs in the previous Emacs 24.1 update I sent for testing. I've updated the diff file[1] with following new diffs added: files/patch-src_config.in - reported by Jan, which silences the implicit declaration of 'openpty' function compiler warning. files

Re: (semi-)official git mirror of ports svn repo?

2012-07-24 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 24/07/2012 18:58 Ulrich Spörlein said the following: > Yes, it's to become the official one, once I get my act together. It's > still missing the git-notes, but that will be fixed later and doesn't > impact anything, really. > > So please use > git://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports.git > > or

mutt 1.5 much slower than mutt 1.4

2012-07-24 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
mail/mutt is much slower on my amd64 and ia64 -current boxes after it was updated from 1.4 to 1.5. Each keystroke takes few seconds to act. Below is my mutt 1.5 config: ===> The following configuration options are available for mutt-1.5.21: MUTT_ASPELL=off: Enable aspell support MUTT_COM

Re: CFT: New mplayer / mencoder snapshot

2012-07-24 Thread Thomas Zander
Hi, New tarball is available for download: http://bsdistfiles.googlecode.com/files/m20120724.tar.bz2 Changes: - General cleanup using portlint (a.o. shlib versions) - Rearrangement of compiler/binutils dependencies - Inclusion of Juergen's suggestion for ${ARCH}=="amd64" on legacy systems (I was

Re: Upgrading xmlto-0.0.24 to 0.0.25 failing

2012-07-24 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 23.07.2012 22:50, schrieb sindrome: > Can't upgrade xmlto -- anyone have ideas? > > ===> Building for xmlto-0.0.25 > make all-am > depbase=`echo xmlif/xmlif.o | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/&|;s|\.o$||'`; cc > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -MT > xmlif/xmlif.o -MD -MP -MF $dep

Re: mutt 1.5 much slower than mutt 1.4

2012-07-24 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 24.07.2012 19:18, schrieb Anton Shterenlikht: > mail/mutt is much slower on my amd64 and ia64 > -current boxes after it was updated from 1.4 > to 1.5. Each keystroke takes few seconds to > act. Below is my mutt 1.5 config: ... > Anybody else is seeing this behaviour? Not here™ on amd64 9-stabl

Re: mutt 1.5 much slower than mutt 1.4

2012-07-24 Thread Matthias Andree
> strance effects on occasions in -STABLE (RELENG_[6-9]) branches for me. s/strance/strange/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@f

[CFT] LibreOffice on 7.x & 8.x

2012-07-24 Thread Jung-uk Kim
ffice-20120724.tar.bz2 Basically, I am trying to build it with base GCC again for these releases, mainly to avoid huge build/runtime dependencies. In fact, it was successfully built on 7.4 & 8.2 with amd64 but I don't have environment to perform actual runtime tests for all possibl

Re: mutt 1.5 much slower than mutt 1.4

2012-07-24 Thread Jason Hellenthal
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 06:18:43PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > mail/mutt is much slower on my amd64 and ia64 > -current boxes after it was updated from 1.4 > to 1.5. Each keystroke takes few seconds to > act. Below is my mutt 1.5 config: > > ===> The following configuration options are avai