> > Then, from UPDATING file, I could do either
> > portmaster p5-
> I specifically recommend not doing that, as you'll end up with stuff
> that's mixed between the old and new versions, which can cause problems.
> > Maybe I could combine these as
> > portmaster -r png- -r perl-
> > Would that
Hi,
I've installed a new 8.2 Release box and cvsup'd the ports tree from
cvsup.uk.freebsd.org.
When installing any port, make config is no longer being run when using either
portmaster or make itself. It works if I run make config manually.
I know the repo has moved from cvs to svn but I ca
We *are* making progress in cutting through the backlog though.
ports have about 900 open PR. Why it does not have more port commiters?
Its difficult to recruit new person?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l
On 7/17/12 7:41 AM, Radim Kolar wrote:
We *are* making progress in cutting through the backlog though.
ports have about 900 open PR. Why it does not have more port
commiters? Its difficult to recruit new person?
The answer to that is very complex.
And, for each PR, maybe a different answer.
Radim Kolar :
We *are* making progress in cutting through the backlog though.
ports have about 900 open PR. Why it does not have more port
commiters? Its difficult to recruit new person?
More committers does not mean that the backlog will be processed faster,
just as more developers on a pr
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:53:34 +0200
Marcus von Appen articulated:
> Radim Kolar :
>
> >> We *are* making progress in cutting through the backlog though.
> > ports have about 900 open PR. Why it does not have more port
> > commiters? Its difficult to recruit new person?
>
> More committers does
The 3.13 patch fails in 7 places.
Sorry for not using github
--
Anton Shterenlikht
Room 2.6, Queen's Building
Mech Eng Dept
Bristol University
University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944
Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423
___
freebsd-ports@free
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:20:46PM +0200, Gareth Hopkins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've installed a new 8.2 Release box and cvsup'd the ports tree from
> cvsup.uk.freebsd.org.
>
> When installing any port, make config is no longer being run when using
> either portmaster or make itself. It works if I
On 7/17/2012 2:49 PM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
The 3.13 patch fails in 7 places.
Sorry for not using github
One good reason to integrate the patch with upstream is that it would
avoid us this unpleasant work of updating the patch after every release.
_
On 7/17/2012 11:21 AM, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> On 7/17/2012 2:49 PM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>> The 3.13 patch fails in 7 places.
>>
>> Sorry for not using github
>>
> One good reason to integrate the patch with upstream is that it would
> avoid us this unpleasant work of updating the patch after
On 17 July 2012 04:53, Marcus von Appen wrote:
>
> Radim Kolar :
>
>
>>> We *are* making progress in cutting through the backlog though.
>>
>> ports have about 900 open PR. Why it does not have more port commiters?
>> Its difficult to recruit new person?
>
>
> More committers does not mean that th
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 07:54:59AM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> >>We *are* making progress in cutting through the backlog though.
> >ports have about 900 open PR. Why it does not have more port
> >commiters? Its difficult to recruit new person?
> The answer to that is very complex.
> And, for
On 7/17/2012 23:39, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 07:54:59AM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
We *are* making progress in cutting through the backlog though.
ports have about 900 open PR. Why it does not have more port
commiters? Its difficult to recruit new person?
The answer to
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:09:50AM +0200, John Marino wrote:
> Would it be so bad if all my submitted patches (as a recognized
> quality contributor with history) just got committed as a passthrough?
This has been explored on the mailing lists before, however, we don't
technically have a way to do
Browsing http://www.freshports.org/commits.php ,
I found a bad WWW link for news/suck:
WWW: http://home.comcast.net/~bobyetman/
Result of clicking that link was:
Sorry, the page you were looking for could not be found.
Suggested Actions
Check the URL that you have typed and retry.
Tom
Thank you for your efforts in migrating the ports repository.
On 2012-Jul-16 15:22:13 +0200, Beat Gaetzi wrote:
>The ports tree switched to Subversion this weekend. CVS commit mails
>will be turned off soon. If you like to receive the ports commit mails
>from Subversion please subscribe to svn-po
Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:26:15AM -0400, Henry Hu wrote:
> For the png problem, I think that we can use png_jmpbuf for any
> libpng
> >= 1.2.5? It seems to be exist at least from libpng 1.2.5
> (http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/libpng-1.2.5-manual.html) so it's
> safe to use it?
Should be. But accordi
On 17 Jul 2012 23:17, "John Marino" wrote:
>
> On 7/17/2012 23:39, Mark Linimon wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 07:54:59AM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
> We *are* making progress in cutting through the backlog though.
ports have about 900 open PR. Why it does not have m
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 05:43:02PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:09:50AM +0200, John Marino wrote:
> > Would it be so bad if all my submitted patches (as a recognized
> > quality contributor with history) just got committed as a passthrough?
>
> This has been explored on
On 7/18/2012 00:43, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:09:50AM +0200, John Marino wrote:
Would it be so bad if all my submitted patches (as a recognized
quality contributor with history) just got committed as a passthrough?
This has been explored on the mailing lists before, howeve
Hi Peter,
2012/7/18 Peter Jeremy :
> Thank you for your efforts in migrating the ports repository.
>
> On 2012-Jul-16 15:22:13 +0200, Beat Gaetzi wrote:
>>The ports tree switched to Subversion this weekend. CVS commit mails
>>will be turned off soon. If you like to receive the ports commit mails
21 matches
Mail list logo
