Current unassigned ports problem reports

2012-06-25 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .) The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsol

AW:Re: Linux binary looks for /proc/cpuinfo, dies when cannot be found, even when linprocfs mounted.

2012-06-25 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Hi,  while the problem seems to be fixed, I still want to comment on the chroot part: do not do this! Linux_base is NOT designed to be used in a chroot. If you need to chroot,  use a linux_dist port. If someone uses chroot with linux_base, he will not get what he expects to get. The linux_base

Re: [CFT] gdal 1.9.1 update and other changes

2012-06-25 Thread Frank Broniewski
Hi, I got an error today while I tried to compile py-gdal in a jail where the ports dir is mounted as read-only. I don't know if that's really the reason for the compilation failure, but I can't think of anything else. The error is: make: don't know how to make sanity-config. Stop my /etc/ma

ports/169078

2012-06-25 Thread Kimmo Paasiala
Hi, I wrote a small fix for ports-mgmt/psearch some time ago and I submitted a bug report http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=169078 and the maintainer of the port rolled out a new distfile for a new version but the fix hasn't been yet committed to the ports tree. Could someone commit this?

Re: ports/169078

2012-06-25 Thread Wesley Shields
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 06:24:22PM +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > Hi, > > I wrote a small fix for ports-mgmt/psearch some time ago and I > submitted a bug report > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=169078 and the maintainer > of the port rolled out a new distfile for a new version but the

xfce 10 and icons

2012-06-25 Thread Thomas Zander
Hi, I noticed a minor regression during my (very) recent upgrade to xfce 10. Apparently, most xfce applications don't seem to use the Tango icons. For example, Thunar does not display the stock folder icon next to the directory names anymore, instead there is no icon. The xfce applications menu ha

Re: xfce 10 and icons

2012-06-25 Thread Tony McC
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:16:52 +0200 Thomas Zander wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed a minor regression during my (very) recent upgrade to xfce > 10. Apparently, most xfce applications don't seem to use the Tango > icons. For example, Thunar does not display the stock folder icon next > to the directory

Re: xfce 10 and icons

2012-06-25 Thread Heino Tiedemann
Tony McC wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:16:52 +0200 > Thomas Zander wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I noticed a minor regression during my (very) recent upgrade to xfce >> 10. Apparently, most xfce applications don't seem to use the Tango >> icons. For example, Thunar does not display the stock folder i

Re: xfce 10 and icons

2012-06-25 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Tony McC wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:16:52 +0200 > Thomas Zander wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I noticed a minor regression during my (very) recent upgrade to xfce >> 10. Apparently, most xfce applications don't seem to use the Tango >> icons. For example, Thunar does

Re: xfce 10 and icons

2012-06-25 Thread Olivier Duchateau
2012/6/25 Thomas Zander : > Hi, > > I noticed a minor regression during my (very) recent upgrade to xfce > 10. Apparently, most xfce applications don't seem to use the Tango > icons. For example, Thunar does not display the stock folder icon next > to the directory names anymore, instead there is n

Re: xfce 10 and icons

2012-06-25 Thread Thomas Zander
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > I didn't have anything other than Tango installed, so I installed > icons-human-azul and used that to switch from Tango and back again. Exactly the same here. I did not have another set of icons installed as well :-) Thank you all for

Port system "problems"

2012-06-25 Thread Florent Peterschmitt
Hello, I'm not a developer and I know how it's difficult to make a port (or some ports, for example VirtualBox) but I think the port system has many "problems": 1. Ports are not modular 2. Option system is not really well documented 3. Some dependencies are totally useless 4. So slow... Let

Re: Port system "problems"

2012-06-25 Thread Niclas Zeising
On 06/26/12 00:22, Florent Peterschmitt wrote: Hello, I'm not a developer and I know how it's difficult to make a port (or some ports, for example VirtualBox) but I think the port system has many "problems": 1. Ports are not modular 2. Option system is not really well documented 3. Some depende

Re: Port system "problems"

2012-06-25 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Florent Peterschmitt wrote: > Hello, > > I'm not a developer and I know how it's difficult to make a port (or some > ports, for example VirtualBox) but I think the port system has many > "problems": > > 1. Ports are not modular > 2. Option system is not really well

Re: print/ghostscript9 build fail : vga.h not found

2012-06-25 Thread Hiroki Sato
Florent Peterschmitt wrote in <4fe67fb7.30...@gmail.com>: fp> On 24.06.2012 02:46, Hiroki Sato wrote: fp> > Florent Peterschmitt wrote fp> >in <4fe1b98b.5040...@gmail.com>: fp> > fp> > fp> gmake: *** [so] Erreur 2 fp> > fp> *** Error code 1 fp> > fp> fp> > fp> Stop in /usr/ports/print/ghos

Re: Port system "problems"

2012-06-25 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:22:28AM +0200, Florent Peterschmitt wrote: > Hello, > > I'm not a developer and I know how it's difficult to make a port (or > some ports, for example VirtualBox) but I think the port system has many > "problems": > > 1. Ports are not modular What do you mean by modul