> Hi johans at FreeBSD.org
> & cc ports@
> A 9.0-RELEASE ports fails on
> cd print/texinfo ; make fetch
> unless one imports newer values from current,
...
> So how best to modify Makefile to not break on size & sha256 of
> some but not all files ?
>
> The question can't be unique to this
On Jun 15, 2012 10:13 PM, "Jerry" wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:12:58 +0100
> Chris Rees articulated:
>
> >On 15 June 2012 18:53, Etienne Robillard wrote:
> >> On 06/15/2012 01:08 PM, Jerry wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Skype 4.0 for Linux is now available. Is there any possibility of
> >>> getting it p
Hi,
emacs 24 final is out
There isn't an emacs 24 final in editors/emacs neither in
editors/emacs-devel
is there someone working on that?
Heino
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To u
Hi Julian,
Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> A 9.0-RELEASE ports fails on
> cd print/texinfo ; make fetch
> unless one imports newer values from current,
I copied the versions used by this port to my own server to prevent this
failure, specificially for the case that the primary sources updates the
Hi
I followed UPDATING instructions and deleted -r /akonadi immediately before
running portupgrade -a which resulted in an upgrade to kde4 8.4.
Now I seem to have a problem with kmail which when launched gives:
Error kmail
kmail encountered a fatal error and will terminate now. The err
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:00:47 + (UTC)
Jerry wrote:
> So, are you implying that ALSA (Advanced Linux Sound Architecture)
> is never going to happen on a FreeBSD system?
Our OSS sound subsystem works (and allows multiple access) without
twenty different sound servers, mixers, shim layers and mu
On 13 June 2012 16:21, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> After recent mention in this list that UNIQUENAME is not actually a
> unique name for each port and how obviously non-sensical that is, plus
> how it causes various problems with OPTIONS processing and how having a
> proper UNIQUENAME
I've upgraded all kde4 to kde4.8.4 except for kdenetwork. It breaks as
shown below but I have no idea where to begin to look to try and fix it.
[ 12%] Building CXX object kget/CMakeFiles/kgetcore.dir/core/urlchecker.o
[ 12%] Building CXX object kget/CMakeFiles/kgetcore.dir/settings.o
[ 12%] Buil
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> What's wrong with devel/p5-Locale-gettext all of a sudden?
Please ignore, this was a local problem. Turned out the the SSD was
starting to corrupt files. Luckily I got a backup off the drive in
time, and the SSSD was fixed by upgrading
On 16-6-2012 15:30, Edwin L. Culp W. wrote:
> I've upgraded all kde4 to kde4.8.4 except for kdenetwork. It breaks as
> shown below but I have no idea where to begin to look to try and fix it.
>
>
> [ 12%] Building CXX object kget/CMakeFiles/kgetcore.dir/core/urlchecker.o
> [ 12%] Building CXX ob
On 16/06/2012 14:18, Chris Rees wrote:
> That's great-- though rather than patching colliding-only ports, can't
> we just add the category to it?
>
> .for cat in ${CATEGORIES}
> UNIQUEPREFIX?= ${cat}
> .endfor
>
> (copying the code from PKGCATEGORY; might be better off moving the
> PKGCATEGORY co
On 16 June 2012 15:13, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 16/06/2012 14:18, Chris Rees wrote:
>> That's great-- though rather than patching colliding-only ports, can't
>> we just add the category to it?
>>
>> .for cat in ${CATEGORIES}
>> UNIQUEPREFIX?= ${cat}
>> .endfor
>>
>> (copying the code from PKGCAT
On 16-6-2012 15:18, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 13 June 2012 16:21, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> After recent mention in this list that UNIQUENAME is not actually a
>> unique name for each port and how obviously non-sensical that is, plus
>> how it causes various problems with OPTIONS pr
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 03:13:28PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 16/06/2012 14:18, Chris Rees wrote:
> > That's great-- though rather than patching colliding-only ports, can't
> > we just add the category to it?
> >
> > .for cat in ${CATEGORIES}
> > UNIQUEPREFIX?= ${cat}
> > .endfor
> >
> > (
On 16-6-2012 16:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 03:13:28PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> On 16/06/2012 14:18, Chris Rees wrote:
>>> That's great-- though rather than patching colliding-only ports, can't
>>> we just add the category to it?
>>>
>>> .for cat in ${CATEGORIES}
Mel Flynn writes:
> Please retry as make -DDISABLE_MAKE_JOBS build.
> That will show us the real error.
And please have CMAKE_VERBOSE set so we can see the full command line of
the call that's causing problems.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing li
On 16/06/2012 15:26, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 16 June 2012 15:13, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> On 16/06/2012 14:18, Chris Rees wrote:
>>> That's great-- though rather than patching colliding-only ports, can't
>>> we just add the category to it?
>>>
>>> .for cat in ${CATEGORIES}
>>> UNIQUEPREFIX?= ${cat}
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 05:06:36PM +0200, Mel Flynn wrote:
> On 16-6-2012 16:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 03:13:28PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> >> On 16/06/2012 14:18, Chris Rees wrote:
> >>> That's great-- though rather than patching colliding-only ports, can't
> >
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 05:11:25PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 05:06:36PM +0200, Mel Flynn wrote:
> > On 16-6-2012 16:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 03:13:28PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > >> On 16/06/2012 14:18, Chris Rees wrote:
> >
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Heino Tiedemann wrote on 22.05.2012 23:56:
>> ajtiM wrote:
>>
>>> On Monday 07 May 2012 06:56:00 Matthieu Volat wrote:
Hello everybody,
As gimp 2.8 was released a few days ago, I naturaly tried to get it working
on my 9.0-RELEASE desktop :)
>
On 16/06/2012 15:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> What could be added is a UNIQUENAMESUFFIX to be able to have a finer grain
> name.
That's certainly possible, but I was thinking about your plans to create
sub-packages. As I understand it, you'll be building and installing
each port into a stagin
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 04:49:22PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 16/06/2012 15:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > What could be added is a UNIQUENAMESUFFIX to be able to have a finer grain
> > name.
>
> That's certainly possible, but I was thinking about your plans to create
> sub-packages. A
2012/6/16 Raphael Kubo da Costa
> Mel Flynn writes:
>
> > Please retry as make -DDISABLE_MAKE_JOBS build.
> > That will show us the real error.
>
> And please have CMAKE_VERBOSE set so we can see the full command line of
> the call that's causing problems.
>
> ___
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 19:56:56 +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> On 6/9/2012 7:46 PM, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
>> I've made a mistake of installing pkgng on 9.0-amd64 but since there is
>> no up-to-date repository I want to remove it.
> Have you looked at http://pkgbeta.freebsd.org/freebsd-9-amd64/latest
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 04:26:59PM +, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 19:56:56 +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote:
>
> > On 6/9/2012 7:46 PM, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
> >> I've made a mistake of installing pkgng on 9.0-amd64 but since there is
> >> no up-to-date repository I want to remove
"Edwin L. Culp W." writes:
> It broke at :
>
> 73%] Building CXX object
> kopete/protocols/jabber/googletalk/libjingle/talk/examples/call/CMakeFiles/call.dir/console.o^Jcd
> /usr/ports/net/kdenetwork4/ >
> /usr/local/lib/libmediastreamer.so: undefined reference to
> `snd_pcm_hw_params@ALSA_0.9'
>
On 2012-06-16 17:49, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 16/06/2012 15:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> What could be added is a UNIQUENAMESUFFIX to be able to have a finer grain
>> name.
>
> That's certainly possible, but I was thinking about your plans to create
> sub-packages. As I understand it, you'
On 16/06/2012 20:11, Olli Hauer wrote:
> With one RPM spec file you can build foo, foo-docs, foo-devlibs and
> foo-examples in one build and get 4 rpm's in one run.
>
> With the ports infrastructure we have to run several builds
> one for foo, one for foo-devlibs and maybe one for foo-docs if doc
Heino Tiedemann writes:
> Hi,
> emacs 24 final is out
> There isn't an emacs 24 final in editors/emacs neither in
> editors/emacs-devel
> is there someone working on that?
Hi Heino,
I'm the maintainer of editos/emacs*, and I'm working on it. It'll take a bit
of time, because it'll require a
On 2012-06-16 22:36, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 16/06/2012 20:11, Olli Hauer wrote:
>> With one RPM spec file you can build foo, foo-docs, foo-devlibs and
>> foo-examples in one build and get 4 rpm's in one run.
>>
>> With the ports infrastructure we have to run several builds
>> one for foo, one
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
"Waitman Gobble" wrote:
> dude like since MS bought it they haven't even released any non-win32
> version. i agree, a different alternative to skype is better, and get
> your contacts to join up with that.
If you don't count Mac, Android, and some other .
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:11:03 -0400
Rich Neese wrote:
> On 6/15/2012 5:08 PM, Robert Simmons wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Jerry wrote:
> >> Skype 4.0 for Linux is now available. Is there any possibility of
> >> getting it ported to FreeBSD? The latest version in ports is only
> >>
Hi
This patch adds an option to build nginx-devel with the recently announced spdy
patch, it alse cleans up some errors flagged by portlint which allows "port
test" to build this port
http://pastebin.com/hfhjhukQ
Sevan / Venture37
___
freebsd-ports@
Martin Wilke wrote on 07.06.2012 16:37:
Hi Fans,
The FreeBSD Xorg Team is pleased to announce Xorg 7.7 Release. We are
Just finished the upgrade on yesterday's -current amd64 with
(WITH_NEW_XORG and WITH_KMS) along with png15 update. Upgrade goes
smoothly and everything works fine to me. I a
ash...@freebsd.org (Ashish SHUKLA) wrote:
> Heino Tiedemann writes:
>> emacs 24 final is out
>
>> There isn't an emacs 24 final in editors/emacs neither in
>> editors/emacs-devel
>
>
>> is there someone working on that?
>
> Hi Heino,
>
> I'm the maintainer of editos/emacs*, and I'm working on it.
35 matches
Mail list logo
