2012-06-04 07:25, Leslie Jensen skrev:
During the png- upgrade I now hit another obstacle.
What can I do to remedy it?
Thanks
/Leslie
devel/qt4-makeqpf:make reinstall
===> Patching for qt4-makeqpf-4.8.2
===> Applying extra patch
/usr/ports/devel/qt4-makeqpf/../../devel/qt4/files/patch-c
I'm getting these errors on the screen when I quit xfce:
I do have dbus installed.
---
(xfdesktop:37212): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid cast from
`XfdesktopWindowIc
onManager' to `XfdesktopFileIconManager'
(xfce4-session:37195):
There is another problem with options and portmaster.
I have WITHOUT_X11=yes in make.conf and if I try to install
emulators/virtualbox-ose for the first time it immediately ends with
error message instead of showing options dialog.
# po
On 6/3/12, Erich wrote:
...
> On 03 June 2012 PM 1:12:38 b. f. wrote:
>> > On 03 June 2012 PM 5:42:55 Adam Strohl wrote:
>> > > On 6/3/2012 17:24, Etienne Robillard wrote:
...
>> With regard to your request for a versioned Ports trees -- well, we
>> have had that for about 18 years, since the
Hi,
On 04 June 2012 12:08:14 Adam Strohl wrote:
> On 6/4/2012 4:23, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > On 03 June 2012 PM 11:41:12 Adam Strohl wrote:
> >> On 6/3/2012 19:19, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> >>> do a simple thing. Install a naked 8.3, 9.0 or 10.0 on a fresh hard disk.
> >>> Get then the ports tre
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .)
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsol
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
On 04.06.2012 11:55, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
There is another problem with options and portmaster.
I have WITHOUT_X11=yes in make.conf and if I try to install
emulators/virtualbox-ose for the first time it immediately ends with
error message instead of showing options dialog.
--
Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
On 04.06.2012 11:55, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
There is another problem with options and portmaster.
I have WITHOUT_X11=yes in make.conf and if I try to install
emulators/virtualbox-ose for the first time it immediately ends with
error message instead of showing options
On 6/4/2012 18:07, Erich wrote:
yes, you installed bash and screen first.
Can you try it without?
Doesn't tinderbox do this every night?
I really try to install X as the first thing after I finished installation.
>
I wonder why you need bash from the ports at that stage?
Because that is
On 6/4/12 7:36 AM, Adam Strohl wrote:
Doesn't tinderbox do this every night?
And, as a committer, here is the point.
We get reports of 'this doesn't build'. (no fixed attached, no logs, no
indication of what was installed first, what options taken), we try to
get information on what happend
Hi,
I run 10-CURRENT r235646 and CVS updated ports (both from May, 19);
skype-2.1.0.81,1 is working fine, uncluding viedo: the port
net-im/skype-devel still says, that video is broken;
is there some pre-view to test or to help debugging?
thanks
matthias
--
Matthias Apitz
Release Mana
Hi,
On 03 June 2012 23:03:47 Janketh Jay wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 08:50 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > On 03 June 2012 PM 7:54:46 Janketh Jay wrote:
>
> >>> a person who operated Windows for some years does not see
> >>> him/herself as a newcomer but still fails on FreeBSD. The word
> >>> goe
On 04.06.2012 13:29, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
On 04.06.2012 11:55, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
There is another problem with options and portmaster.
I have WITHOUT_X11=yes in make.conf and if I try to install
emulators/virtualbox-ose for the first time it immediately ends
On 6/3/2012 1:44 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The new options framework is now in the port for a week, most of the problems
> directly concerning the framework seems to have been addressed.
>
> regards,
> Bapt
A common question I have seen is how to support 0 or 1 in the SINGLE list
On 4-6-2012 14:58, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> On 04.06.2012 13:29, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
>> Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
>>> On 04.06.2012 11:55, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
There is another problem with options and portmaster.
I have WITHOUT_X11=yes in make.conf and if I try to install
Leslie Jensen writes:
> During the png- upgrade I now hit another obstacle.
>
> What can I do to remedy it?
>
> Thanks
>
> /Leslie
>
> devel/qt4-makeqpf:make reinstall
> ===> Patching for qt4-makeqpf-4.8.2
> ===> Applying extra patch
> /usr/ports/devel/qt4-makeqpf/../../devel/qt4/files/patch-co
Hi!
> > devel/qt4-makeqpf:make reinstall
> > ===> Patching for qt4-makeqpf-4.8.2
> > ===> Applying extra patch
> > /usr/ports/devel/qt4-makeqpf/../../devel/qt4/files/patch-configure
> > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
> > 5 out of 5 hunks ignored--saving rejects to ./configure.r
Hello.
I've got a (little) problem with snort..
_ In /usr/local/etc/snort/snort.conf I have:
> output alert_syslog: LOG_SECURITY LOG_ALERT
_ in /etc/syslog.conf:
> security.* /var/log/security
> auth.info /var/log/auth.l
On 6/4/2012 18:36, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 6/4/2012 18:07, Erich wrote:
yes, you installed bash and screen first.
Can you try it without?
From a 100% clean install:
- portsnap fetch extract update
- compiled x-org + VMware driver
No issues, works fine.
Kurt Jaeger writes:
> Hi!
>
>> > devel/qt4-makeqpf:make reinstall
>> > ===> Patching for qt4-makeqpf-4.8.2
>> > ===> Applying extra patch
>> > /usr/ports/devel/qt4-makeqpf/../../devel/qt4/files/patch-configure
>> > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
>> > 5 out of 5 hunks ignored--
After big update session from weekend, when trying to build
graphics/gdal, I get the following messages:
[...]
gmake[2]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-1.9.0/frmts/gif'
/bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --mode=compile --tag=CXX c++ -O2 -pipe
-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
Hi,
On 04 June 2012 21:10:31 Adam Strohl wrote:
> On 6/4/2012 18:36, Adam Strohl wrote:
> > On 6/4/2012 18:07, Erich wrote:
> >> yes, you installed bash and screen first.
> >>
> >> Can you try it without?
> >
>
> From a 100% clean install:
>
> - portsnap fetch extract update
> - compiled x-org
On 6/4/2012 21:59, Erich wrote:
Hi,
On 04 June 2012 21:10:31 Adam Strohl wrote:
On 6/4/2012 18:36, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 6/4/2012 18:07, Erich wrote:
yes, you installed bash and screen first.
Can you try it without?
From a 100% clean install:
- portsnap fetch extract update
- compiled x
I have just installed libreoffice-3.5.2_4 and are now getting the
following error
javaPathHelper: not found
I understand that this error is known according to this tread
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=27035
I'm wondering if there's any fix available?
Regards
/Leslie
_
On 04.06.2012 16:47 (UTC+2), Rainer Hurling wrote:
After big update session from weekend, when trying to build
graphics/gdal, I get the following messages:
[...]
gmake[2]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-1.9.0/frmts/gif'
/bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --mode=compile --tag=
Hi.
can someone help me with this - It occured after the PNG lib update
CC libpangocairo_1_0_la-pangocairo-context.lo
CC libpangocairo_1_0_la-pangocairo-font.lo
CC libpangocairo_1_0_la-pangocairo-fontmap.lo
CC libpangocairo_1_0_la-pangocairo-render.lo
CC libpangocai
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 05:22:30PM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
> I have just installed libreoffice-3.5.2_4 and are now getting the
> following error
>
> javaPathHelper: not found
>
> I understand that this error is known according to this tread
>
> http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Heino Tiedemann
wrote:
> Hi.
>
>
> can someone help me with this - It occured after the PNG lib update
>
> CC libpangocairo_1_0_la-pangocairo-context.lo
> CC libpangocairo_1_0_la-pangocairo-font.lo
> CC libpangocairo_1_0_la-pangocairo-fontmap.lo
> CC
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
> wrote:
>> Em Qui, 2012-05-31 às 17:31 +0200, Leslie Jensen escreveu:
>>
>>>
>>> 2012-05-31 14:24, Robert Huff skrev:
>>> >
>>> > Leslie Jensen writes:
>>> >
>>> >> -
In article <20120604120054.GA1849@tiny> you write:
>Hi,
Hi!
>
>I run 10-CURRENT r235646 and CVS updated ports (both from May, 19);
>
>skype-2.1.0.81,1 is working fine, uncluding viedo: the port
>net-im/skype-devel still says, that video is broken;
>
>is there some pre-view to test or to help debugg
Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Heino Tiedemann
> wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>>
>> can someone help me with this - It occured after the PNG lib update
>>
>> CC libpangocairo_1_0_la-pangocairo-context.lo
>> CC libpangocairo_1_0_la-pangocairo-font.lo
>> CC libpangocairo
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 11:54:06PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > You found a nice bug.
> >
> > The options file is read the thing is that the UNIQUENAME is changed is
> > py-py-stl when the optionsfile is read and it is py27-py-stl when it is
> > written.
> >
> > I don't know why yet, I'l
On 31.05.2012 11:36, Leslie Jensen wrote:
Help Please!
Thanks
---
Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry !
For more help with debugging build errors, please see the section in:
http://wiki.
Since the last port update, I get this sticky error in gdal:
libtool: compile: g++46 -O3 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -march=native
-Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc46 -Wall
-I/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-1.9.0/port
-I/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-1.9.0/gcore
-I/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/
Hi!
> Since the last port update, I get this sticky error in gdal:
It's in graphics/giflib, the latest update to 4.2.0 dropped
the symbol PrintGifError. All the dependent packages need
to be recompiled 8-(
Yes, I know. This is messy.
> libtool: compile: g++46 -O3 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -ma
On 04.06.2012 21:34 (UTC+2), O. Hartmann wrote:
Since the last port update, I get this sticky error in gdal:
libtool: compile: g++46 -O3 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -march=native
-Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc46 -Wall
-I/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work/gdal-1.9.0/port
-I/usr/ports/graphics/gdal/work
On 06/04/12 21:47, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> On 04.06.2012 21:34 (UTC+2), O. Hartmann wrote:
>> Since the last port update, I get this sticky error in gdal:
>>
>> libtool: compile: g++46 -O3 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -march=native
>> -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc46 -Wall
>> -I/usr/ports/graphics/gd
Hi all,
I think I found a bug in the new Options framework:
When more than one MULTI group is defined, only the last one is shown
in the OPTIONS window and in "make showconfig":
# make showconfig
===> The following configuration options are available for atunes-2.0.1_2:
CDDA2WAV=on: Ripper:
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 19:50:52 +0200 (CEST)
Juergen Lock wrote:
> In article <20120604120054.GA1849@tiny> you write:
> >Hi,
> Hi!
> >
> >I run 10-CURRENT r235646 and CVS updated ports (both from May, 19);
> >
> >skype-2.1.0.81,1 is working fine, uncluding viedo: the port
> >net-im/skype-devel still
On 04/06/2012 21:29, Lars Engels wrote:
> OPTIONS_DEFINE= CDDA2WAV
>
> OPTIONS_MULTI= ENCODER
> OPTIONS_MULTI_ENCODER= LAME VORBIS FLAC
>
> OPTIONS_MULTI= ENGINE
> OPTIONS_MULTI_ENGINE= MPLAYER XINE
>
> OPTIONS_DEFAULT=MPLAYER CDDA2WAV LAME VORBIS
You need:
The new options framework sorts all of the options by default before
presenting them to the user. I have mixed feelings about this, however
there is supposed to be a workaround for those of us who have grouped
the options for our ports into logical chunks, NO_OPTIONS_SORT.
Today I tried defining t
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 09:41:40PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 04/06/2012 21:29, Lars Engels wrote:
> > OPTIONS_DEFINE= CDDA2WAV
> >
> > OPTIONS_MULTI= ENCODER
> > OPTIONS_MULTI_ENCODER= LAME VORBIS FLAC
> >
> > OPTIONS_MULTI= ENGINE
> > OPTIONS_MULTI_ENGINE= MP
Hello,
It seems that giflib 4.2.0 (graphics/giflib) requires xmlto
(textproc/xmlto) and xmlto drags in w3m, which I do not want.
Why does version 4.2.0 of giflib suddenly require xmlto?
Previous versions of giflib managed fine without it.
--
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen
With gcc47 unfortunately I'm stuck on a boost.
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/usr/obj/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.2.2/boost
it seems that the error is inside 'boost', please re-run build
inside this module to isolate the error and/or test your fix:
---
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 01:47:03PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> The new options framework sorts all of the options by default before
> presenting them to the user. I have mixed feelings about this, however
> there is supposed to be a workaround for those of us who have grouped
> the options for our
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/04/2012 15:22, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 01:47:03PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> The new options framework sorts all of the options by default
>> before presenting them to the user. I have mixed feelings about
>> this,
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 03:28:24PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 06/04/2012 15:22, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 01:47:03PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> >> The new options framework sorts all of the options by default
>
On 06/04/2012 04:29, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Yes, that's right. But I am confused why portmaster does not show the
> options dialog to let user uncheck QT4?
There is code to do this if you use the --force-config option. I haven't
made that the default yet because it's a fairly complex part of th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/04/2012 15:31, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> I'll try to come asap with a fix for that
Thanks!
- --
This .signature sanitized for your protection
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJPzTggAAoJEFzG
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 03:28:24PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 06/04/2012 15:22, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 01:47:03PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> >> The new options framework sorts all of the options by default
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/04/2012 15:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Can you try with this patch ?
> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/bsd.options.mk.diff
>
> Still adding NO_OPTIONS_SORT=yes
With this change the options are no longer sorted, and do appear, but
they app
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012, O. Hartmann wrote:
Since the last port update, I get this sticky error in gdal:
PrintGifError() was removed from giflib resulting in libraries that used
it to cause the error. I temp-hack a fix in my set-up by adding a line of
code to one of the files that form giflib:
www/libxul has been broken for some time due to security
vulnerabilities. This issue has been highlighted by the recent
portrevision bump caused by png. As libxul is based on firefox-3.6
I presume this brokenness is terminal. Since libxul is the only
remaining gecko, this presents an issue for a
On 6/1/2012 9:30 PM, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> I'm not sure it's a good idea.
> Ruby 1.9 still has some nasty bugs on FreeBSD, related to the threads and
> fork. That is fork in ruby 1.9 hangs sometimes...
I ran into the fork() issue last year as well.
However, testing my scripts on 1.9.3 on Fr
On 06/01/12 22:30, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
>
> I'm not sure it's a good idea.
> Ruby 1.9 still has some nasty bugs on FreeBSD, related to the threads and
> fork. That is fork in ruby 1.9 hangs sometimes...
The ONLY thing I can find is this:
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/2097
which implies th
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 07:53:52AM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> On 6/4/12 7:36 AM, Adam Strohl wrote:
> >Doesn't tinderbox do this every night?
> And, as a committer, here is the point.
> We get reports of 'this doesn't build'. (no fixed attached, no
> logs, no indication of what was install
Leslie Jensen wrote:
> ---
> Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry !
> For more help with debugging build errors, please see the section in:
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development
>
>
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 23:41:05 +0300
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> Last time I tested, yes, that was one of the problems.
> Current beta from skype is at .99, you could give it a try, but I
> don't expect anything better. And upcoming 3 is even worse.
I tested already it doesn't work, because it require
Le 05.06.2012 05:48, Heino Tiedemann a écrit :
Leslie Jensen wrote:
---
Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry !
For more help with debugging build errors, please see the section in:
http:
2012-06-04 18:58, Baptiste Daroussin skrev:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 05:22:30PM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
I have just installed libreoffice-3.5.2_4 and are now getting the
following error
javaPathHelper: not found
I understand that this error is known according to this tread
http://forums
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 03:58:24PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 06/04/2012 15:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > Can you try with this patch ?
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/bsd.options.mk.diff
> >
> > Still adding NO_OPTIONS_SORT=yes
>
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 07:42:33AM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
>
> 2012-06-04 18:58, Baptiste Daroussin skrev:
> > On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 05:22:30PM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
> >>
> >> I have just installed libreoffice-3.5.2_4 and are now getting the
> >> following error
> >>
> >> javaPathHe
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 09:26:10PM +0200, Florent wrote:
> On 31.05.2012 11:36, Leslie Jensen wrote:
> >
> > Help Please!
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry !
> > Fo
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 07:13:56AM +0200, coder.tuxfamily wrote:
> Le 05.06.2012 05:48, Heino Tiedemann a écrit :
> > Leslie Jensen wrote:
> >
> >> ---
> >> Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry !
> >>Fo
2012-06-05 08:09, Baptiste Daroussin skrev:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 07:42:33AM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
2012-06-04 18:58, Baptiste Daroussin skrev:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 05:22:30PM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
I have just installed libreoffice-3.5.2_4 and are now getting the
following
66 matches
Mail list logo
