Hi,
Would you file a PR to ask for repocopy of devel/codeblocks -->
devel/codeblocks-devel
?
wen
2012/5/22 coder.tuxfamily
> Hello,
>
> Codeblocks in the ports it's very old. The svn version give some very
> useful new functionality.
>
> I'm trying to port the codeblocks devel version. It's
Is it feasible to chroot into an i386 environment when booted to FreeBSD amd64
for the purpose of building and installing ports for i386?
FreeBSD i386 would be installed to /compat/i386 directory or to a USB stick
that could be mounted to this directory, or even a partition on a USB hard
drive.
On 23-5-2012 3:46, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Koop Mast wrote:
On 22-5-2012 23:48, Warren Block wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Gök?in Akdeniz wrote:
If you downgrade "cairo port" it will be ok. If you update ports tree
with csup try portdowngrade. If not try to get
Hi
trying to make net-im/skype works on 8.3-STABLE,
got the following once I enter my login/pass:
/usr/local/share/skype/skype: relocation error:
/usr/local/share/skype/skype: symbol snd_device_name_hint, version
ALSA_0.9 not defined in file libasound.so.2 with link time reference
however
Hello!
May be /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/poudriere + /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg is
what you really need?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr
On 5/24/12 6:47 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Is it feasible to chroot into an i386 environment when booted to FreeBSD amd64
for the purpose of building and installing ports for i386?
this is basically what tinderbox does.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +
On Wed, 23 May 2012 22:43:51 -0700
Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Robert wrote:
> >
> > Hello Port readers
> >
> > I am unable to upgrade to latest evince due to following failure.
> > Evince now calls for www/yelp which calls for www/libxul which has
> > vulnerabilities
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Robert wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 22:43:51 -0700
> Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Robert wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello Port readers
>> >
>> > I am unable to upgrade to latest evince due to following failure.
>> > Evince now calls for www/ye
On Thu, 24 May 2012 08:50:35 -0500
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Robert wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 May 2012 22:43:51 -0700
> > Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Robert
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hello Port readers
> >> >
> >> > I am unable to
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:53:41PM +0200, Koop Mast wrote:
> Can people try this and see if it fixes the problems?
> http://people.freebsd.org/~kwm/patch-cairo
> Just put it in x11-servers/xorg-server/files/ and rebuild xorg-server.
> Works for both 1.7 and 1.10.
Hello all !
Yes, this fix works
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Jacques Chanel wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:53:41PM +0200, Koop Mast wrote:
>> Can people try this and see if it fixes the problems?
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~kwm/patch-cairo
>> Just put it in x11-servers/xorg-server/files/ and rebuild xorg-server.
>> W
On 05/24/2012 01:28 PM, Oliver Pinter wrote:
Script started on Thu May 24 19:25:44 2012
op has logged on :0 from local.
root has logged on ttyv1 from local.
ESC[1mopESC[m@ESC[4mopnESC[24m ~> gdb sleep ^M
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software,
I *must* revert xorg to a point at which changing ttys works.
portdowngrade does not seem to work with metaports -- apparently it does not
revert the dependencies - which is what a metaport is all about. So when the
metaport is built, it may put it's own (old) version number on the port, but
act
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:07:43PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Jacques Chanel wrote:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:53:41PM +0200, Koop Mast wrote:
> >> Can people try this and see if it fixes the problems?
> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~kwm/patch-cairo
> >>
On 5/24/2012 6:47 AM, Alexander V. Ribchansky wrote:
> Hello!
>
> May be /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/poudriere + /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg is
> what you really need?
Yes you can run a 32bit jail on a 64bit machine.
Poudriere works really well for building packages like this.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewer
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 07:03:40PM +0200, Jacques Chanel wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:53:41PM +0200, Koop Mast wrote:
> > Can people try this and see if it fixes the problems?
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~kwm/patch-cairo
> > Just put it in x11-servers/xorg-server/files/ and rebuild xorg-s
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 08:53:40PM +0200, Jacques Chanel wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 07:03:40PM +0200, Jacques Chanel wrote:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:53:41PM +0200, Koop Mast wrote:
> > > Can people try this and see if it fixes the problems?
> > > http://people.freebsd.org/~kwm/patch-ca
On 24 May 2012 19:43, Lars Eighner wrote:
>
> I *must* revert xorg to a point at which changing ttys works.
>
> portdowngrade does not seem to work with metaports -- apparently it does not
> revert the dependencies - which is what a metaport is all about. So when the
> metaport is built, it may pu
On Thu, 24 May 2012, Chris Rees wrote:
On 24 May 2012 19:43, Lars Eighner wrote:
I *must* revert xorg to a point at which changing ttys works.
portdowngrade does not seem to work with metaports -- apparently it does not
revert the dependencies - which is what a metaport is all about. So when
On 24 May 2012 21:15, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 24 May 2012 19:43, Lars Eighner wrote:
>>
>> I *must* revert xorg to a point at which changing ttys works.
>>
>> portdowngrade does not seem to work with metaports -- apparently it does not
>> revert the dependencies - which is what a metaport is all a
On 05/24/2012 06:47 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Is it feasible to chroot into an i386 environment when booted to FreeBSD
> amd64 for the purpose of building and installing ports for i386?
You need a proper jail with an i386 system installed, not just a chroot.
hth,
Doug
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 06:29:20PM -0400, Robert Simmons wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
> > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 03:08:31PM -0400, Robert Simmons wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Wesley Shields wrote:
> >> > As the person who committed this update I
Hello there,
For your information, there are new versions for the Haskell Platform
[1] and the Glasgow Haskell Compiler [2] about to land in the next few
days, and we have prepared the update in our GitHub repository for
now. There you could take a look at them before they are scheduled
for integ
Synopsis: [REPOCOPY] devel/codeblocks --> devel/codeblocks-devel
Responsible-Changed-From-To: dinoex->ports
Responsible-Changed-By: dinoex
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri May 25 08:17:42 CEST 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
No released version:
http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads/source
1) Either e
24 matches
Mail list logo
