new port: in lang/ or www?

2012-04-05 Thread Michael Scheidell
Should this be in ../lang/urweb or in ../www/urweb ? doesn't install anything in WWWDIR, and submitter suggests this should be in ../lang. cat pkg-descr Ur is a programming language in the tradition of ML and Haskell, but featuring a significantly richer type system. Ur is functional, pure,

Re: new port: in lang/ or www?

2012-04-05 Thread Rodrigo OSORIO
On 05/04/12 10:41 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote: > Should this be in ../lang/urweb or in ../www/urweb ? > doesn't install anything in WWWDIR, and submitter suggests this should > be in ../lang. > > cat pkg-descr > > Ur is a programming language in the tradition of ML and Haskell, but > featur

Re: new port: in lang/ or www?

2012-04-05 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:41:21AM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote: > Should this be in ../lang/urweb or in ../www/urweb ? > doesn't install anything in WWWDIR, and submitter suggests this should > be in ../lang. > > cat pkg-descr > > Ur is a programming language in the tradition of ML and Haske

Re: new port: in lang/ or www?

2012-04-05 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Michael Scheidell (scheid...@freebsd.org) wrote: > Should this be in ../lang/urweb or in ../www/urweb ? > doesn't install anything in WWWDIR, and submitter suggests this should > be in ../lang. Yes, lang/ seems to be more suitable. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D3

Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump?

2012-04-05 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 3/30/12 4:35 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: o When pkg-plist changes (except for fixing .ifdef/NOPORT(DOCS|EXAMPLES)) #1 covers this, this is the OPTIONS case (default vs not) perfect example, real world. pr hasn't been submitted yet. In short what you change is irrelevant.

Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump?

2012-04-05 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
On 04/05/12 20:04, Michael Scheidell wrote: > on this one, I did. And was told by crees that I didn't need to wrap > PORTDOCS= around an ifdef. > > So, 2 programmers, 2 opinions. Thank God I didn't ask in ports@. Of the 2 of them one is right. At least as it is currently documented. # PORTDOCS

Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump?

2012-04-05 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
On 04/05/12 20:04, Michael Scheidell wrote: > But from a users perspective, why do through the problems of rebuilding > a port, (bringing in updated dependencies, conflicts regression > testing), just to delete 100K from his ../share directory? Thats a larger argument. pav@ would ask why do we bot

Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump?

2012-04-05 Thread Mel Flynn
On 4/5/2012 22:21, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > On 04/05/12 20:04, Michael Scheidell wrote: >> on this one, I did. And was told by crees that I didn't need to wrap >> PORTDOCS= around an ifdef. >> >> So, 2 programmers, 2 opinions. Thank God I didn't ask in ports@. > Of the 2 of them one is right.

FreeBSD Port: samba34-3.4.14

2012-04-05 Thread Da Rock
Building samba 3.6, 3.5, 3.4... noticed a missing dependency during build on net/libnet. Maybe need to add this to the port? Cheers ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send

Re: FreeBSD Port: samba34-3.4.14

2012-04-05 Thread Timur I. Bakeyev
Hi! Can you show the build output? Port should't directly dipend from anything like this. Cheers. On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Da Rock wrote: > Building samba 3.6, 3.5, 3.4... noticed a missing dependency during build on > net/libnet. Maybe need to add this to the port? > > Cheers __

Re: php5 and pgsql/sqlite

2012-04-05 Thread Daniel Braniss
problem solved, compiling php with: LINKTHR=on "Link thread lib (for threaded extensions)" fixed it. > On 2012-04-02 17:22, Daniel Braniss wrote: > > hi, > > whenever extensions=pgsql.so or/and extensions=slqlite3.so is added > > php exits with error (Exit 1) > > > > without those modules: > >