PICO port

2012-04-01 Thread Jos Chrispijn
I have been out of FreeBSD some time, but when installing BSD9 I can't locate pico anymore. What I did is: - portsnap fetch - portsnap extract - portsnap update but pico seems to be completely gone? Who can tell me what I oversee here? Jos Chrispijn

Re: PICO port

2012-04-01 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 01/04/2012 10:25, Jos Chrispijn wrote: > I have been out of FreeBSD some time, but when installing BSD9 I can't > locate pico anymore. What I did is: > - portsnap fetch > - portsnap extract > - portsnap update > > but pico seems to be completely gone? > Who can tell me what I oversee here? Us

Re: PICO port

2012-04-01 Thread Jos Chrispijn
Hi Matt, Thanks, I guess I should take more attention on these critical changes K-) regards, Jos Chrispijn Matthew Seaman: On 01/04/2012 10:25, Jos Chrispijn wrote: I have been out of FreeBSD some time, but when installing BSD9 I can't locate pico anymore. What I did is: - portsnap fetch -

Preferred way of applying OSVERSION-dependend patches

2012-04-01 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Good day! What is a preferred way of doing subj? 1. Add an extra-patch-* to files/ subdirectory and apply it depending of checks in Makefile (.if ${OSVERSION}). 2. Add an patch-* to files subdirectory that applies unconditionally and that checking for __FreeBSD_version in app code itself.

Re: x11-wm/enlightenment-0.16.999.55225,2

2012-04-01 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Hi Brandon, Brandon Foster wrote on 01.04.2012 08:35: To whom it may concern, My name is Brandon Foster, and I am interested in porting ecomp and the e17 module ecomorph to FreeBSD. I am willing to volunteer to write the necessary ports, but I have a few questions. The version of enlightenment

Re: rawtherapee 4.0.7 build failure on 9-STABLE amd64

2012-04-01 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 31.03.2012 10:43, schrieb Ruslan Mahmatkhanov: > Matthias Andree wrote on 31.03.2012 11:01: >> Ruslan, >> >> I cannot build rawtherapee 4.0.7 on 9-STABLE amd64, >> re-running it after failure with "make MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes" yields: > [...] >> math.h line 239 declares "double log2(double);", so

Re: vdr 1.7.27 again; mail issue

2012-04-01 Thread Juergen Lock
In article <20120331184433.ga20...@freefall.freebsd.org> you write: >First: If someone of you tried to email me, the mailserver I'm normally >using seems to have a hardware failure, fixing that may take a little >while longer, it happened right at the beginning of the weekend... :) >[...] ..and

Re: Preferred way of applying OSVERSION-dependend patches

2012-04-01 Thread Chris Rees
On 1 Apr 2012 11:03, "Ruslan Mahmatkhanov" wrote: > > > Good day! > > What is a preferred way of doing subj? > > 1. Add an extra-patch-* to files/ subdirectory and apply it depending > of checks in Makefile (.if ${OSVERSION}). > 2. Add an patch-* to files subdirectory that applies unconditionall

Re: PICO port

2012-04-01 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 11:45:41 +0200 Jos Chrispijn wrote: > Hi Matt, > > Thanks, I guess I should take more attention on these critical > changes K-) > > regards, > Jos Chrispijn > > Matthew Seaman: > > On 01/04/2012 10:25, Jos Chrispijn wrote: > >> I have been out of FreeBSD some time, but wh

BUILD_DEPENDS and libraries -- how to express build-time-only dependency on library?

2012-04-01 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Ports. In case of static build of ported program, port need to have BUILD_DEPENDS on libraries. LIB_DEPENDS is not suitable here, because inc ase of static linkage, there will no dependency on livbrary in runtime. But BUILD_DEPENDS search for files at absolute pathname or for executable

Re: BUILD_DEPENDS and libraries -- how to express build-time-only dependency on library?

2012-04-01 Thread Julien Laffaye
On 4/1/2012 2:58 PM, Lev Serebryakov wrote: Hello, Ports. In case of static build of ported program, port need to have BUILD_DEPENDS on libraries. LIB_DEPENDS is not suitable here, because inc ase of static linkage, there will no dependency on livbrary in runtime. But BUILD_DEPENDS search

Re: BUILD_DEPENDS and libraries -- how to express build-time-only dependency on library?

2012-04-01 Thread Chris Rees
On 1 April 2012 14:04, Julien Laffaye wrote: > On 4/1/2012 2:58 PM, Lev Serebryakov wrote: >> >> Hello, Ports. >> >>   In case of static build of ported program, port need to have >> BUILD_DEPENDS on libraries. LIB_DEPENDS is not suitable here, because >> inc ase of static linkage, there will no d

Re: PICO port

2012-04-01 Thread Jason Hellenthal
Open your eyes editors/pico-alpine find(1) or ports-mgmt/psearch or ( make -C /usr/ports quicksearch name="..." ) will help you in the future On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 11:25:35AM +0200, Jos Chrispijn wrote: > I have been out of FreeBSD some time, but when installing BSD9 I can't > locate pico

FreeBSD Port: php5-5.3.10_1

2012-04-01 Thread Michael
Hello, Please upgrade freebsd php5 to the 5.4.x series. Regards, zoon01 developer www.nas4free.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-po

Re: BUILD_DEPENDS and libraries -- how to express build-time-only dependency on library?

2012-04-01 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Julien. You wrote 1 апреля 2012 г., 17:04:06: >>In case of static build of ported program, port need to have >> BUILD_DEPENDS on libraries. LIB_DEPENDS is not suitable here, because >> inc ase of static linkage, there will no dependency on livbrary in >> runtime. >>But BUILD_DEPENDS

Re: BUILD_DEPENDS and libraries -- how to express build-time-only dependency on library?

2012-04-01 Thread Chris Rees
On 1 April 2012 17:53, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Julien. > You wrote 1 апреля 2012 г., 17:04:06: > >>>    In case of static build of ported program, port need to have >>> BUILD_DEPENDS on libraries. LIB_DEPENDS is not suitable here, because >>> inc ase of static linkage, there will no depend

Re: BUILD_DEPENDS and libraries -- how to express build-time-only dependency on library?

2012-04-01 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Chris. You wrote 1 апреля 2012 г., 20:59:18:    Is it possible to express build-time-only dependency on library? >>> BUILD_DEPENDS=${LOCALBASE}/lib/libfoo.a:${PORTSDIR}/foo/libfoo ? >>  It works, but here are other problem: if iconv or gettext or >> something like this are used, they a

Re: BUILD_DEPENDS and libraries -- how to express build-time-only dependency on library?

2012-04-01 Thread Mel Flynn
On 4/1/2012 18:53, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Julien. > You wrote 1 апреля 2012 г., 17:04:06: > >>>In case of static build of ported program, port need to have >>> BUILD_DEPENDS on libraries. LIB_DEPENDS is not suitable here, because >>> inc ase of static linkage, there will no dependency

Re: BUILD_DEPENDS and libraries -- how to express build-time-only dependency on library?

2012-04-01 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Chris. You wrote 1 апреля 2012 г., 21:22:36: >    Is it possible to express build-time-only dependency on library? BUILD_DEPENDS=${LOCALBASE}/lib/libfoo.a:${PORTSDIR}/foo/libfoo ? >>>  It works, but here are other problem: if iconv or gettext or >>> something like this are used, th

Re: Preferred way of applying OSVERSION-dependend patches

2012-04-01 Thread Eitan Adler
On 1 April 2012 06:02, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > > Good day! > > What is a preferred way of doing subj? > > 1. Add an extra-patch-* to files/ subdirectory and apply it depending >   of checks in Makefile (.if ${OSVERSION}). > 2. Add an patch-* to files subdirectory that applies unconditionally

Re: Preferred way of applying OSVERSION-dependend patches

2012-04-01 Thread Jason Helfman
> On 1 April 2012 06:02, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: >> >> Good day! >> >> What is a preferred way of doing subj? >> >> 1. Add an extra-patch-* to files/ subdirectory and apply it depending >>   of checks in Makefile (.if ${OSVERSION}). >> 2. Add an patch-* to files subdirectory that applies uncon

Re: Preferred way of applying OSVERSION-dependend patches

2012-04-01 Thread RW
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:02:15 +0400 Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > > Good day! > > What is a preferred way of doing subj? > > 1. Add an extra-patch-* to files/ subdirectory and apply it depending > of checks in Makefile (.if ${OSVERSION}). > 2. Add an patch-* to files subdirectory that applies

Re: Preferred way of applying OSVERSION-dependend patches

2012-04-01 Thread Chris Rees
On 1 Apr 2012 21:34, "RW" wrote: > > On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:02:15 +0400 > Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > > > > > Good day! > > > > What is a preferred way of doing subj? > > > > 1. Add an extra-patch-* to files/ subdirectory and apply it depending > > of checks in Makefile (.if ${OSVERSION}). >

About PHP 5.X in FreeBSD port tree

2012-04-01 Thread James Chang
Dear Sir, I found the following ports in FreeBSD ports tree are maintained by you： 1. /usr/ports/lang/php5 2. /usr/ports/lang/php5-extensions PHP has officially released PHP 5.4.0 on 01-Mar-2012, it fix the folowing security bug: CVE-2011-2483 CVE-2011-4153 CVE-2011-3389 Also

hercules port...

2012-04-01 Thread Christer Solskogen
is a bit outdated. 3.07 is the latest version. -- chs, ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Mason 2 - anyone updating? (www/p5-HTML-Mason)

2012-04-01 Thread G. Paul Ziemba
Ports has version 1.45 of Mason. Is anyone doing an update to 2.X? cheers, ~!paul -- G. Paul Ziemba FreeBSD unix: 10:41PM up 42 days, 7:34, 30 users, load averages: 0.29, 0.20, 0.16 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org