On 3/28/2012 8:21 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> Looking for an FAQ on PORTREVISION bumps on commits, pr's.
If the package is going to change, it needs to be bumped. It's
unfortunate that we don't have more flexibility in the system, but it is
what it is.
> Basically, I make the decision based on
On 3/26/2012 9:24 AM, Steve Frowly wrote:
> It's as if slim does not load /etc/login.conf
I like slim for its small size, but it doesn't play nice with a variety
of things (this is one of them). I solved the problem you described with
environment variables by actually including them in my .xsessio
On 3/23/2012 1:14 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
> Just as a thought, I decided to try stripping out all mentions of
> %%DATADIR%%, %%DOCSDIR%% etc from pkg-plist, and replacing them with
> PORTDOCS=*, PORTDATA=* in the Makefiles etc.
How much time does creating the dynamic plists take for ports with
large
Hi all,
so we took this off list for a bit to work out an implementation.
On 3/29/2012 10:46, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 28/03/2012 22:04, Mel Flynn wrote:
>> I'm not sure about exclusion. I have an implementation up here:
>> http://redports.org/browser/melflynn/net-mgmt/observium/bsd.www.mk
>>
>
Hi,
I've recently built the jabberd port and upgraded to the latest version: 2.x
I'm having major problems in configuring it though and was wondering
if someone could either give me a hand or help me generate
certificates for it which are mentioned in the config file but not
within the /usr/local
Waitman Gobble wrote ..
> Waitman Gobble wrote ..
> > Waitman Gobble wrote ..
> > > Chris Rees wrote ..
> > > > Forwarding to more appropriate list, and CCing kde@
> > > >
> > > > On 28 March 2012 15:55, Waitman Gobble wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am having an issue wi
On 29/03/2012 15:45, Kaya Saman wrote:
> I've recently built the jabberd port and upgraded to the latest version: 2.x
Actually jabberd2 (net-im/jabberd) is a completely different different
project to jabberd14 (net-im/jabber) -- it's not "upgrading" so much as
switching to a different piece of sof
Howdy Porters,
I just finished clobbering all of the post-deinstall targets that were in
the portstree. Currently, this is an invalid target to use in a port.
Please use the default pkg-deinstall file:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/book.html#PKG-FILES
or, use SUB_FILES:
h
On 2012.03.29. 20:49, Jason Helfman wrote:
I will work on a effort, as well, to get some supporting documentation
into
the Porter's Handbook.
Jason, thanks for this cleanup work. Have you checked if there is any
portlint check for this? It would also be very valuable.
Gabor
__
On 2012-Mar-28 20:52:13 +, "Philip M. Gollucci" wrote:
>Absolutely, b/c we maintain PORTREVISION for pointyhat not the end users
This is completely backwards. The Project exists for end-users and
end users need a way to determine when there's been a change to a port
that needs them to re-ins
On 3/29/12 4:02 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2012-Mar-28 20:52:13 +, "Philip M. Gollucci" wrote:
Absolutely, b/c we maintain PORTREVISION for pointyhat not the end users
This is completely backwards. The Project exists for end-users and
There are no end users. You must belong to that 'en
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 09:47:27PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan thus spake:
On 2012.03.29. 20:49, Jason Helfman wrote:
I will work on a effort, as well, to get some supporting documentation
into
the Porter's Handbook.
Jason, thanks for this cleanup work. Have you checked if there is any
portlint check
There are no problems with this that can be seen. Thank you Roman.
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 07:26:34PM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
> >
> > Apparently this port has fell two versions behind. Is there anything
> > that is going to happen to update it to the curren
Attempts to build this port on i386 with WITH_OPENSSL (the default
option) fail for me. I have tried four systems: 2 x 8.3-RC2 and 2 x
9.0-RELEASE. I don't have a 64-bit system available for test. All
builds stop at the same place. Builds succeed on all systems if I set
WITHOUT_OPENSSL.
Build
On 30/03/2012 10:44, John Marshall wrote:
> Attempts to build this port on i386 with WITH_OPENSSL (the default
> option) fail for me. I have tried four systems: 2 x 8.3-RC2 and 2 x
> 9.0-RELEASE. I don't have a 64-bit system available for test. All
> builds stop at the same place. Builds succee
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 02:11:33PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
> On 03/27/12 21:42, Da Rock wrote:
> > I've been hunting down some info on why this is failing, but all I
> > keep running into is the previous versions failings... :(
> >
> > I'm building libreoffice on 9.0-Release amd64, and I'm getting b
16 matches
Mail list logo
