Re: Boost ports update

2012-03-13 Thread Alexander Churanov
Folks, There is good news: editors/koffice-kde4 builds successfully with Boost 1.48. It was failing in my tests because of conflict with qt33. The only dependent port left that fails after update to 1.48 is deskutils/kdepim4. For others we either have fixes or a plan how to cope with failures. I

FreeBSD Port: py27-pyramid-1.2_1

2012-03-13 Thread Fabio Dive
Hello, I am Fabio.. I am a proudly pyramid python user and BSD admin since some time, I would like to help you to prepare the port of the last version and maybe give a look further to see if we need to port some other related packages as well. Thank you Fabio Balzano ___

Re: Boost ports update

2012-03-13 Thread Max Brazhnikov
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:17:58 +0400, Alexander Churanov wrote: > Folks, > > There is good news: editors/koffice-kde4 builds successfully with Boost 1.48. > It was failing in my tests because of conflict with qt33. > > The only dependent port left that fails after update to 1.48 is > deskutils/kdep

qpopper compile failure

2012-03-13 Thread David Southwell
qpopper has been working fine (amd64 running postfix) but on portupgrade I am Getting the following error: set MISSING_OBJS to base64.o set MISSING_SRCS to base64.c Set AR_FLAG = -r ; RANLIB_CMD = checking for sendmail program... ERROR: The sendmail program cannot be located ===> Script "c

Re: qpopper compile failure

2012-03-13 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 13/03/2012 13:01, David Southwell wrote: > qpopper has been working fine (amd64 running postfix) but on portupgrade I am > Getting the following error: > > set MISSING_OBJS to base64.o > set MISSING_SRCS to base64.c > Set AR_FLAG = -r ; RANLIB_CMD = > checking for sendmail program... ERRO

Re: Boost ports update

2012-03-13 Thread Max Brazhnikov
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:20:30 +, Max Brazhnikov wrote: > On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:17:58 +0400, Alexander Churanov wrote: > > Folks, > > > > There is good news: editors/koffice-kde4 builds successfully with Boost > > 1.48. > > It was failing in my tests because of conflict with qt33. > > > > The

FreeBSD Port: apache-2.4.X & php5-5.4.X

2012-03-13 Thread alexus
Hello, sorry if I'm jumping the gun, but as you probably already know Apache httpd 2.4 released yet no updates at or at least I didn't find any at: http://wiki.freebsd.org/bsd.apache.mk in terms of when package/port would be created slightly off topic yet still _VERY_ important peace and _VERY_ w

Re: FreeBSD Port: apache-2.4.X & php5-5.4.X

2012-03-13 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
On 03/13/12 21:59, alexus wrote: > sorry if I'm jumping the gun, but as you probably already know Apache > httpd 2.4 released yet no updates at or at least I didn't find any at: > http://wiki.freebsd.org/bsd.apache.mk in terms of when package/port > would be created Largely mine and ohaurer's sched

Re: FreeBSD Port: apache-2.4.X & php5-5.4.X

2012-03-13 Thread alexus
.. on behalf of a lot of FreeBSD users I'd like to thank you for your time and effort that you put into this project (a lot of us really appreciate that ;)) one more time outline the so called "requirements": 1) apache24 2) mod_php - *stand alone packages* (not just port (which already available)

Receive Fantastic Love at IrishDay Discounts

2012-03-13 Thread IrishDay Love
If you can not display pic, [1] click here [2]3D"UjivUIpkYgE8IsEYRYFmP3MtCQVxQ4p [3]3D"tU1oKNODELGLmGH3ZqaqZY3fUH" <= /td> [4]3D"TY6OpQ7UPVGMVVktKmsT" [5]3D"IcyM0NT6pMQgZPJZTAeqtmb0" [6]3D"S9K9EATbvrhOyoa4oXKfutxv4OGz5EI [7]3D"pJ1ZgeePQLEieHL9d2zoW8A68BIQgFE [8]3D"1yTX5KA

Re: Boost ports update

2012-03-13 Thread Alexander Churanov
2012/3/13 Max Brazhnikov : > > Well, the build have just finished, no problem with kdepim. This is good news! I will fix amd64 issue with Boost-1.48 and sumbit an updated patch. Alexander Churanov, maintainer of devel/boost-* ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.o