On 14 Feb, Maho NAKATA wrote:
> Hi
>
> Looks good. Please commit following patch! thank you!
Committed!
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-u
From: Don Lewis
Subject: Re: OO 3.3.0 fails to build "connectivity" module on amd64 9-STABLE
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:21:00 -0800 (PST)
> On 14 Feb, Maho NAKATA wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Looks good. Please commit following patch! thank you!
>
> Committed!
>
thank you!
___
Running on:
* Intel Sandybridge (+ optimus, disabled) on FreeBSD 9.0
* NVidia GTS 450 on FreeBSD 8.2
Not unkwonw problem.
Usual problem on Intel Sandybridge (tty switch, KMS patch issues on
FreeBSD 9 and optimus incompatibility (/dev/dri/card1)).
Tested with KDE 4.7.4 and desktop effect activ
> On 12.02.2012 22:43, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> > On 02/12/2012 03:33 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 12/02/2012 23:22 Stephen Montgomery-Smith said the following:
> >>> On 02/12/2012 03:15 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >>>
> Today I became another user of redports.org. I can definitely
On 02/14/12 08:40, b. f. wrote:
On 12.02.2012 22:43, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 02/12/2012 03:33 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 12/02/2012 23:22 Stephen Montgomery-Smith said the following:
On 02/12/2012 03:15 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Today I became another user of redports.org. I can de
Hello!
I'm preparing a new port (net/udt), which installs a library with its
header file and a handful of sample applications.
The applications are rather generically named: sendfile, recvfile,
test... Having them in ${PREFIX}/bin
like that would be confusing.
I see two alternatives:
* us
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Originator:John Hein
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: [PATCH] astro/gpstk: update to 1.7
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Category: ports
>Class: update
>Release:
>Environment:
>Description:
- Update astro/gpstk
On 2/14/12 8:26 AM, Mikhail T. wrote:
Hello!
I'm preparing a new port (net/udt), which installs a library with its
header file and a handful of sample applications.
* use a port-specific subdirectory: ${PREFIX}/bin/udt/ (lua seems to
do this)
EXAMPLESDIR
In your port dir, type:
m
On 13 Feb 2012 11:14, "O. Hartmann"
wrote:
>
> This arise today when updating ghostscript9-9.04 to ghostscript9-9.05:
>
>
> cc -DHAVE_MKSTEMP -DHAVE_FONTCONFIG -DHAVE_LIBIDN -DHAVE_SETLOCALE
> -DHAVE_SSE2 -DHAVE_DBUS -O2 -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
> -march=native -fPIC -DUPD_SIGNAL
On 14.02.2012 10:25, Michael Scheidell wrote:
EXAMPLESDIR
I thought, EXAMPLESDIR is for actual examples, such as source code, not compiled
and fully-functional executables... Indeed, the directory is under
${PREFIX}/share -- which, according to hier(7) is for architecture-independent
files.
On 2/14/12 11:18 AM, Mikhail T. wrote:
On 14.02.2012 10:25, Michael Scheidell wrote:
EXAMPLESDIR
I thought, EXAMPLESDIR is for actual examples, such as source code,
not compiled and fully-functional executables... Indeed, the directory
is under ${PREFIX}/share -- which, according to hier(7
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:33:07 +
Chris Rees articulated:
> This has already been discussed on ports@, please don't cross-post.
The problem has not been rectified as of yet. There is an open PR 165093
filed against the port.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Jerry wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:33:07 +
> Chris Rees articulated:
>
>> This has already been discussed on ports@, please don't cross-post.
>
> The problem has not been rectified as of yet. There is an open PR 165093
> filed against the port.
I updated my
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:49:00 -0500
Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
>
> On 2/14/12 11:18 AM, Mikhail T. wrote:
> > On 14.02.2012 10:25, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> >> EXAMPLESDIR
> >
> > I thought, EXAMPLESDIR is for actual examples, such as source code,
> > not compiled and fully-functional executab
On 14.02.2012 13:17, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
The other idea of prefixing them is_much_ better.
Ok, so which flavor of prefixing do you prefer? Should the executable "bar" be
installed as bin/foo-bar or as bin/foo/bar?
-mi
___
freebsd-ports@free
On 14 Feb 2012 18:54, "Mikhail T." wrote:
>
> On 14.02.2012 13:17, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
>>
>> The other idea of prefixing them is_much_ better.
>
>
> Ok, so which flavor of prefixing do you prefer? Should the executable
"bar" be installed as bin/foo-bar or as bin/foo/bar?
bin/foo-bar means it
Hello,
Can someone add an entry in ports/UPDATING for the latest update of
devel/pcre (8.30) ?
All ports that depend on it have to be rebuilt (you have to rebuild
all the box...).
Thanks, regards.
(copy to the maintener (mm))
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd
Mathias Picker wrote:
> Good god,
>
> I must have worn both my eye patches at the same time.
>
> Sorry,
>
> Mathias
Mayby you can try to install graphics/rawtherapee - just to approve
(or discard) my problem.
Heino
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mail
On 2/14/2012 11:27, Chris Rees wrote:
bin/foo-bar means it can still be called without an explicit path, so that
is better.
Look for autoconf hooks to add prefices this way (if it uses configure...)
Please also don't forget to scream at the upstream to stop using such
generic names too. Othe
On 02/14/2012 11:23, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can someone add an entry in ports/UPDATING for the latest update of
> devel/pcre (8.30) ?
>
> All ports that depend on it have to be rebuilt (you have to rebuild
> all the box...).
I added a note that suggests using the -w option for po
So apparently we have a python vulnerability according to
http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/b4f8be9e-56b2-11e1-9fb7-003067b2972c.html,
but I'm not seeing an upgrade to address it yet. Any idea when that will
happen?
Thanks,
Doug
--
It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
On 14/02/2012 22:17, Doug Barton wrote:
> I added a note that suggests using the -w option for portmaster which
> preserves the shared libs until a better solution is found. I guessed on
> the knob for portupgrade, if someone who knows better wants to correct
> it that would be welcome. :)
portup
On 02/14/2012 14:54, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 14/02/2012 22:17, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> I added a note that suggests using the -w option for portmaster which
>> preserves the shared libs until a better solution is found. I guessed on
>> the knob for portupgrade, if someone who knows better wants
Thanks.
On 14.2.2012 23:17, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 02/14/2012 11:23, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Can someone add an entry in ports/UPDATING for the latest update of
>> devel/pcre (8.30) ?
>>
>> All ports that depend on it have to be rebuilt (you have to rebuild
>> all the box...).
>
The rc.d script installed by the smartmontools port is still trying to
use set_rcvar. The problem is that the copy of the script under the
files directory has been updated, but the script that the port actually
installs is work/smartd.freebsd.initd.in, which is an older version.
_
On 02/14/2012 17:08, Don Lewis wrote:
> The rc.d script installed by the smartmontools port is still trying to
> use set_rcvar. The problem is that the copy of the script under the
> files directory has been updated, but the script that the port actually
> installs is work/smartd.freebsd.initd.in,
On 02/14/2012 22:52, poyop...@puripuri.plala.or.jp wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> Do you interested in mail/mimedefang? It also has set_rcvar in
> its rc.d script.
Fixed, thanks.
--
It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowled
27 matches
Mail list logo
