Re: [CFT] Hadoop preliminary port

2012-02-13 Thread Bleakwiser
Whelp, best of luck to you fellas then. Unfortunately I'm lacking the experience that would help you folks with the testing of this port. Hopefully things go well with CVS (it's at least well documented at Apache) otherwise I'll have to dump BSD off my server machine and stick CentOS (yuck) on it

Re: [CFT] Hadoop preliminary port

2012-02-13 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:57:03PM -0800, Bleakwiser wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Eygene Ryabinkin-2 [via FreeBSD] < > ml-node+s1045724n547842...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > > Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:44:03PM -0800, Bleakwiser wrote: > > > I know this isn't exactly the place for it but I reall

Re: [CFT] Hadoop preliminary port

2012-02-13 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 13/02/2012 07:57, Bleakwiser wrote: > Kidding right? > > patch -p1 isn't even mentioned in the man pages. > And again, i've ran, >> > patch hadoop-1.0.0.diff > Nothing happens, just blank cursor. patch expects to read a diff file on its standard input, so the command you need to run is:

Re: [CFT] Hadoop preliminary port

2012-02-13 Thread Bleakwiser
I was able to find some better information on the patch command through wikipeida, their article on it is really great. However I'm still not clear on what files I'm supposed to download to be running the patch on. I've dug around inside the .diff file with pico a bit and it's rather cryptic. Lots

Re: Please test your commits

2012-02-13 Thread Bernhard Froehlich
On 12.02.2012 22:43, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 02/12/2012 03:33 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 12/02/2012 23:22 Stephen Montgomery-Smith said the following: On 02/12/2012 03:15 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: Today I became another user of redports.org. I can definitely recommend it. Yes, but

Re: [CFT] Hadoop preliminary port

2012-02-13 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Hi. > > Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:44:03PM -0800, Bleakwiser wrote: > > I know this isn't exactly the place for it but I really have no idea > what to > > do with this .diff file. > > Try > {{{ > cd /usr/ports > fetch -o - http://people.free

Re: [CFT] Hadoop preliminary port

2012-02-13 Thread Bernhard Froehlich
On 13.02.2012 09:48, Bleakwiser wrote: I was able to find some better information on the patch command through wikipeida, their article on it is really great. However I'm still not clear on what files I'm supposed to download to be running the patch on. I've dug around inside the .diff file wi

Re: print/ghostscript9 fix

2012-02-13 Thread Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
The error occurs becuse it gets jpeg definitions from the system libjpeg before the ones from own openjpeg code. For me, I disable openjpeg code (because it uses system libjpeg also) add = CONFIGURE ARGS+=--disable-openjpeg == after line 67 in the Makefile make c

Current unassigned ports problem reports

2012-02-13 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .) The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsol

print/ghostscript9: ./base/sjpx_openjpeg.c:169: error: too many arguments to function

2012-02-13 Thread O. Hartmann
This arise today when updating ghostscript9-9.04 to ghostscript9-9.05: cc -DHAVE_MKSTEMP -DHAVE_FONTCONFIG -DHAVE_LIBIDN -DHAVE_SETLOCALE -DHAVE_SSE2 -DHAVE_DBUS -O2 -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=native -fPIC -DUPD_SIGNAL=0 -I. -I/usr/ports/print/ghostscript9/work/ghostscript-

Duplicate INDEX entries of long standing

2012-02-13 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
I've been seeing the following it seems like forever in my nightly scheduled ports tree maintenance script output: Starting rebuild of INDEX-10 at Mon Feb 13 03:52:55 CST 2012 Generating INDEX-10 - please wait..Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: gdb-insight-6.6 Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: petsc-

Re: Duplicate INDEX entries of long standing

2012-02-13 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 13/02/2012 11:44, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > I've been seeing the following it seems like forever in my nightly > scheduled ports tree maintenance script output: > > Starting rebuild of INDEX-10 at Mon Feb 13 03:52:55 CST 2012 > > Generating INDEX-10 - please wait..Warning: Duplicate INDEX en

porting percona's xtrabackup (currently version 1.6.4) - call for testing

2012-02-13 Thread claudiu vasadi
Hi guys, I just finished the "Makefile" for percona's xtrbackup utility version 1.6.4. Before submitting I would appreciate if some of you could test it and advise if anything should be adjusted. Thx. Here it is: PORTNAME= xtrabackup PORTVERSION= 1.6.4 CATEGORIES= databases MASTER_SITES= htt

Re: [CFT] Xorg Upgrade 7.5.2

2012-02-13 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: I've run it for a while now and am actually having a pretty serious issue: http://thorn.visualtech.com/screenshot.jpg As you can see, that big window on the right monitor (though certainly doesn't limit itself to just that screen) is almost entirely corrupt. It's an xfc

Re: [CFT] Xorg Upgrade 7.5.2

2012-02-13 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:39:21 +0200 Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: > > > > I've run it for a while now and am actually having a pretty serious > > issue: > > > > http://thorn.visualtech.com/screenshot.jpg > > > > As you can see, that big window on the right monitor (though > >

Re: Duplicate INDEX entries of long standing

2012-02-13 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:39:34 + Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 13/02/2012 11:44, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > I've been seeing the following it seems like forever in my nightly > > scheduled ports tree maintenance script output: > > > > Starting rebuild of INDEX-10 at Mon Feb 13 03:52:55 CST 201

Re: [CFT] Hadoop preliminary port

2012-02-13 Thread Bleakwiser
SVN worked like a charm. I didn't have devel/hadoop initally I guess because I'm running using 9.0 amd_64? I just ran portsnap fetch too, so the port tree was 100% up to date (unless change were made in the last 5 minutes) so that was a non issue. https://svn.redports.org/clement/devel/hadoop/ was

Re: [CFT] Hadoop preliminary port

2012-02-13 Thread Bleakwiser
Well, the poster ^^ was right. The UIDs and GIDs need to be set manually. I'm wanting to do this proper... I'm guessing I need to create a user hadoop, get it's UID and GID then add it to /usr/ports/UIDs /usr/ports/GIDs ? I'm guessing the best way to find out what users I need to create is docume

Re: [CFT] Hadoop preliminary port

2012-02-13 Thread Bleakwiser
I found some documentation here... although it pertains to RHEL and Debian and there is a good chance our IDs differ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7603 I'm no pro but by inducing some of the conversations in the above thread I'm guessing any UID or GID that isn't allocated for s

Re: [CFT] Xorg Upgrade 7.5.2

2012-02-13 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: I've run it for a while now and am actually having a pretty serious issue: http://thorn.visualtech.com/screenshot.jpg As you can see, that big window on the right monitor (though certainly doesn't limit itself to just that screen) is almost entirely corrupt. It's an xfce

Re: [CFT] Hadoop preliminary port

2012-02-13 Thread Bleakwiser
Hah. Snap! I found the UIDs and GIDs... they're in that .diff file =D On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Trae Barlow wrote: > I found some documentation here... although it pertains to RHEL and Debian > and there is a good chance our IDs differ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-76

Re: [CFT] Hadoop preliminary port

2012-02-13 Thread Bleakwiser
Annn /fail on the manual edit, but I 1UPed that localhost# cd /usr/ports localhost# wget http://people.freebsd.org/~clement/hadoop/hadoop-1.0.0.diff localhost# patch < hadoop-1.0.0.diff Well, now i see what the .diff file is for... updating everything by hand would have been x( Looks like al

Re: [CFT] Hadoop preliminary port

2012-02-13 Thread Bleakwiser
*FreeBSD 9.0 / Hadoop 1.0.0 Install Guide From Preliminary Port* After installing FreeBSD 9.0 AMD64 I used 'portsnap fetch' to fetch the latest ports tree, installed Portmaster and with it the Diablo-JDK16 port, wget, svn, rsync, Tomcat7 and Hadoop 1.0.0 . There are plenty of guides online how to

Re: [CFT] Hadoop preliminary port

2012-02-13 Thread Bleakwiser
Oh, 1 last thing. Config files are in the default location (same as apache) /usr/local/etc/hadoop On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Trae Barlow wrote: > *FreeBSD 9.0 / Hadoop 1.0.0 Install Guide From Preliminary Port* > > After installing FreeBSD 9.0 AMD64 I used 'portsnap fetch' to fetch the > l

PR ports/164449: update to finance/gnucash timeout

2012-02-13 Thread Guido Falsi
Hello, I'd like to ask if the PR in the subject can be committed due to maintainer timeout. Thanks in advance! -- Guido Falsi ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any

FreeBSD Port: graphics/rawtherapee

2012-02-13 Thread Heino Tiedemann
Hi, is there anyone who likes zu make graphics/rawtherapee builadable? At the moment ist seems to be broken (also on i386). See: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=164714 Heino ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebs

Re: drupal7

2012-02-13 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 11/02/2012 21:57, Darrel wrote: > Just checking that you had seen the updates. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165101 Nick ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe,

Creating Portshaker-compatible Overlays

2012-02-13 Thread CyberLeo Kitsana
I recently heard about Portshaker, and thought I might give it a go to replace the ad-hoc script I currently use to manage local port overlays. First, are there any plans to support rsync as an update method for source trees? It was a little strange to discover that this was not directly possible.

Re: FreeBSD Port: graphics/rawtherapee

2012-02-13 Thread Mathias Picker
Strange, I can build it just fine, only it crashes without the crude workaround described here: http://bugzilla.rawstudio.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525 mp% uname -a FreeBSD mp.virtual-earth.de 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #5: Wed Feb 8 13:14:32 CET 2012 mathi...@mp.virtual-earth.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/s

Re: Portmaster binary package upgrade question

2012-02-13 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2/10/12 6:14 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 02/10/2012 14:45, Greg Larkin wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> I'm in the midst of building a system to use Tinderbox and FreeBSD jails >> to keep them up to date as new port updates are committed to the tree. >> >>

Re: FreeBSD Port: graphics/rawtherapee

2012-02-13 Thread Heino Tiedemann
Mathias Picker wrote: > Strange, I can build it just fine, only it crashes without the crude > workaround described here: > > http://bugzilla.rawstudio.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525 That has the Toppic RAWSTUDIO. I am talking about RAWTHERAPEE Heino ___

Updating to ghostscript9-9.05

2012-02-13 Thread Jerry
Has a final solution been arrived at for the problem of updating ghostscript9-9.04 > 9.05? I did not see a formal PR filed against it; although I could have easily missed it. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. _

Re: FreeBSD Port: graphics/rawtherapee

2012-02-13 Thread Mathias Picker
Good god, I must have worn both my eye patches at the same time. Sorry, Mathias Am Montag, den 13.02.2012, 22:12 +0100 schrieb Heino Tiedemann: > Mathias Picker wrote: > > > Strange, I can build it just fine, only it crashes without the crude > > workaround described here: > > > > http://bug

ImageMagick/graphviz and gtk2/ghostscript

2012-02-13 Thread rflynn
Hi, for a web-based application I needed ImageMagick and graphviz. It looks impossible to get out of X11 and glib, but it was a little weird that gtk2 is pulled in. The offender being devel/libgsf: .if !defined(WITHOUT_GCONF) || exists(${LOCALBASE}/bin/gconftool-2) USE_GNOME+= gconf2 Is there

Re: OO 3.3.0 fails to build "connectivity" module on amd64 9-STABLE

2012-02-13 Thread Don Lewis
On 10 Feb, Maho NAKATA wrote: > Hi > > I also reproduced, and pointy hat, either. > It looks like ooo port is broken again... > > Thanks > Nakata Maho > > From: Lawrence Stewart > Subject: OO 3.3.0 fails to build "connectivity" module on amd64 9-STABLE > Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:42:30 +1100 >

Re: OO 3.3.0 fails to build "connectivity" module on amd64 9-STABLE

2012-02-13 Thread Maho NAKATA
Hi Looks good. Please commit following patch! thank you! Best, Nakata Maho From: Don Lewis Subject: Re: OO 3.3.0 fails to build "connectivity" module on amd64 9-STABLE Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:32:42 -0800 (PST) > On 10 Feb, Maho NAKATA wrote: >> Hi >> >> I also reproduced, and pointy hat, e

Re: OO 3.3.0 fails to build "connectivity" module on amd64 9-STABLE

2012-02-13 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 02/14/12 17:32, Don Lewis wrote: On 10 Feb, Maho NAKATA wrote: Hi I also reproduced, and pointy hat, either. It looks like ooo port is broken again... Thanks Nakata Maho From: Lawrence Stewart Subject: OO 3.3.0 fails to build "connectivity" module on amd64 9-STABLE Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012