FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked broken

As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common probl

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on th

FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on th

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked forbidden

As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often, these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known exploits. An overview of each port, inclu

Re: linux-f10-nss_ldap: my first port - be gentle :)

On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 12:46:54 +1000 Da Rock wrote: > And finally checksums: I create a checksum for the port, the linux sites > have checksums, and I was advised in passing to check the checksums > match. The checksums are going to differ aren't they? Linux and BSD > checksums wouldn't be the s

Re: Introducing fpart - a file partitioning tool

On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 5:10 AM, andrew clarke wrote: > On Fri 2012-01-06 11:36:56 UTC+0100, Ganael LAPLANCHE > (ganael.laplan...@martymac.org) wrote: > >> Have you ever wondered how you could split a file tree into parts of the >> same size, or into parts with a limited size or file number ? >> >

Re: Introducing fpart - a file partitioning tool

On 07/01/2012 10:33, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 5:10 AM, andrew clarke wrote: >> On Fri 2012-01-06 11:36:56 UTC+0100, Ganael LAPLANCHE >> (ganael.laplan...@martymac.org) wrote: >> >>> Have you ever wondered how you could split a file tree into parts of the >>> same size, or

Re: linux-f10-nss_ldap: my first port - be gentle :)

On 01/07/12 19:11, Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 12:46:54 +1000 Da Rock wrote: And finally checksums: I create a checksum for the port, the linux sites have checksums, and I was advised in passing to check the checksums match. The checksums are going to differ aren't they? Linux an

Re: linux-f10-nss_ldap: my first port - be gentle :)

On 07.01.2012 14:01 (UTC+1), Da Rock wrote: On 01/07/12 19:11, Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 12:46:54 +1000 Da Rock wrote: And finally checksums: I create a checksum for the port, the linux sites have checksums, and I was advised in passing to check the checksums match. The checksu

Re: linux-f10-nss_ldap: my first port - be gentle :)

On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 12:46:54 +1000 Da Rock wrote: > Ok, clean slate. Lets start afresh :) > > First I need a way to test properly. Alex, you mention I need a ports > tree on the machine, and then you say to create a directory somewhere > and put Makefile in it and run make (as root). Does the

problem with games/pokerth upgrade

Hello, I'm seeking counsel on the upgrade of games/pokerth to latest version. The new version depends on textproc/tinyxml, but requires it to be compiled with TIXML_USE_STL defined, wich, at present, is not the default. I tested adding such an option to the tinyxml port making it the default

Re: linux-f10-nss_ldap: my first port - be gentle :)

On 6 January 2012 21:16, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > The linux ports are a little bit special. They are binary ports and the > GPL requires that we distribute the source too. Really? That's not how I read the GPL, nor its interpretation: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhatDoesWrittenO

new port license question:

I am working on committing a new port; ports/163698: new port graphics/py-stl (deprecates graphics/stl2pov) submitted by the author of py-stl. inside his man page, he has this: The latest version of this program is available at: .Lk htt

Re: FreeBSD Port: f2c-20060810_3 - Missing Extract depend unzip

Hi Jason From: Jason Hall Subject: FreeBSD Port: f2c-20060810_3 - Missing Extract depend unzip Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:56:04 -0500 > Hello, > > In FreeBSD 9.0, "unzip" was added to the base install. yes. > As a result, the PORT fails to extract properly, because it is trying to use > /usr/

Re: linux-f10-nss_ldap: my first port - be gentle :)

On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 08:31:04PM +, Chris Rees wrote: > On 6 January 2012 21:16, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > The linux ports are a little bit special. They are binary ports and the > > GPL requires that we distribute the source too. > > Really? That's not how I read the GPL, nor its inte

Re: new port license question:

On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 08:42:04PM -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote: > I am working on committing a new port; > > > ports/163698: new port graphics/py-stl (deprecates graphics/stl2pov) > > submitted by the author of py-stl. > > inside his m