Hello there,
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Don Stewart wrote:
> We're pleased to announce the release of the Haskell Platform: a
> single, standard Haskell distribution for everyone.
>
> Download the Haskell Platform 2011.4.0.0:
>
> http://haskell.org/platform/
>
> The specification, along
Hi all,
Since we've stopped using pkg-install scripts and started using USERS=
and GROUPS= to create users and groups we've lost the ability to
provide an alternative username/groupname for the port to install
with.
It's still possible to do for a port (ex postgresql):
PG_USER?= pgsql
USERS= ${
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 11:18:04 +
Chris Rees wrote:
> On 17 December 2011 10:47, Denise H. G. wrote:
> >
> > Hi all
> >
> > With the version bump of x11/xcb-util, some ports seems to be
> > broken. However, after recompiling x11/startup-notification, and
> > all the ports that depend on x11/s
Can anyone explain why I'm seeing the following?
libX11-1.4.99.1 < needs updating (index has
1.4.4,1)
How is it that version 1.4.99.1 compares as "less than" 1.4.4,1?
Since when is 99 < 4?
Is it the PORTEPOCH in 1.4.4,1 that's throwing a monkey wrench into the
works?
This
On 12/18/2011 17:43, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
Can anyone explain why I'm seeing the following?
libX11-1.4.99.1
Hi All,
As of 2011/12/13 pypy-1.7 is in ports (under lang/pypy, thanks lwhsu@).
Please uninstall pypy-1.6 before building pypy-1.7, there is a memory leak in
pypy-1.6 that prevents it from translating pypy-1.7.
For those that are interested, there is a TODO list [1] and the WIP repository
f
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> Can anyone explain why I'm seeing the following?
>
> libX11-1.4.99.1 < needs updating (index has
> 1.4.4,1)
>
> How is it that version 1.4.99.1 compares as "less than" 1.4.4,1?
> Since when is 99 < 4?
>
> Is it the
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 10:06:48 -0800
Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier
> wrote:
> > Can anyone explain why I'm seeing the following?
> >
> > libX11-1.4.99.1 < needs updating (index has
> > 1.4.4,1)
> >
> > How is it that version 1.4.99
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Chris and Matthew already noted what the problems are.
> I also suggest to use:
>
> ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}yaml>=0:${PORTSDIR}/devel/py-yaml
That is much cleaner. Thank you.
> So USE_PYTHON=yes should be changed with USE_PYTHON= 2.
The port I'm working on includes about a half-dozen man pages which I
understand I need to use MANn to install. What I guess I don't fully
understand is how to path those files. If the files are found in the
extracted source under source-version/doc/man/ should I use:
MAN1= doc/man/manpage.1
MAN7=
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Christer Edwards
wrote:
> The port I'm working on includes about a half-dozen man pages which I
> understand I need to use MANn to install. What I guess I don't fully
> understand is how to path those files. If the files are found in the
> extracted source under so
Christer Edwards wrote on 19.12.2011 01:25:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
> wrote:
>> Chris and Matthew already noted what the problems are. I also
>> suggest to use:
>>
>> ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}yaml>=0:${PORTSDIR}/devel/py-yaml
>
> That is much cleaner. Thank you.
>
>
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> lang/gcc build would fail for me on FreeBSD 10 (head) with binutils-2.22
>> installed during its configure step with the errors like the following in
>> config.log:
>
> Yes, I am aware of it. lang/gcc is the slowly moving, conservative
> option, lang/
I would like to help spread availability of a linux game that has been
recently open sourced by encouraging it to be included in package
repositories. I don't use FreeBSD and am not yet familiar with *BSD and
would like to request if anyone else is available to prepare a package
for the game. Also,
Mizery De Aria wrote on 19.12.2011 09:54:
> I would like to help spread availability of a linux game that has been
> recently open sourced by encouraging it to be included in package
> repositories. I don't use FreeBSD and am not yet familiar with *BSD and
> would like to request if anyone else is
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011, b. f. wrote:
> Fixes have already been implemented upstream, at Gerald's request, and
> are in lang/gcc46. But these fixes were introduced after the last
> stable release of gcc 4.6, which corresponds to lang/gcc. When a new
> version of gcc 4.6 is released, and the port is u
16 matches
Mail list logo