On 3 Nov 2011 06:11, "Matthias Apitz" wrote:
>
> El día Wednesday, November 02, 2011 a las 08:36:07PM +0100, Matthias
Apitz escribió:
>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I fetched 10-CUR from SVN as r226986 and /usr/ports from CVS on November
> > 1st;
> >
> > The ports/audio/jack seems installing fine, but t
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 00:21 -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> Can anyone explain the difference or need for both of these ?
>
> ports/devel/gconf <-( Should'nt this be the only one needed ? )
> ports/devel/dconf
>
> I just noticed dconf installed on my system.
Well it is true that dconf is the re
El día Thursday, November 03, 2011 a las 12:13:31PM +0100, Edward Tomasz
Napierała escribió:
> > It turns out that the problem is more general! A lot of ./configure
> > scripts are detecting in 10-CUR that they can't or should not build
> > shared libs; the problem is that the OS is detected now
On Thu Nov 3 11, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Wednesday, November 02, 2011 a las 08:36:07PM +0100, Matthias Apitz
> escribió:
>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I fetched 10-CUR from SVN as r226986 and /usr/ports from CVS on November
> > 1st;
> >
> > The ports/audio/jack seems installing fine, but th
Wiadomość napisana przez Matthias Apitz w dniu 3 lis 2011, o godz. 07:10:
> El día Wednesday, November 02, 2011 a las 08:36:07PM +0100, Matthias Apitz
> escribió:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I fetched 10-CUR from SVN as r226986 and /usr/ports from CVS on November
>> 1st;
>>
>> The ports/audio/jack seems ins
Wiadomość napisana przez Matthias Apitz w dniu 3 lis 2011, o godz. 12:26:
> El día Thursday, November 03, 2011 a las 12:13:31PM +0100, Edward Tomasz
> Napierała escribió:
>
>>> It turns out that the problem is more general! A lot of ./configure
>>> scripts are detecting in 10-CUR that they can't
El día Thursday, November 03, 2011 a las 11:28:47AM +, Alexander Best
escribió:
> > It turns out that the problem is more general! A lot of ./configure
> > scripts are detecting in 10-CUR that they can't or should not build
> > shared libs; the problem is that the OS is detected now as
> >
>
Koop Mast wrote on 03.11.2011 13:01:
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 00:21 -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
Can anyone explain the difference or need for both of these ?
ports/devel/gconf<-( Should'nt this be the only one needed ? )
ports/devel/dconf
I just noticed dconf installed on my system.
Well it
On Thu Nov 3 11, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Thursday, November 03, 2011 a las 11:28:47AM +, Alexander Best
> escribió:
>
> > > It turns out that the problem is more general! A lot of ./configure
> > > scripts are detecting in 10-CUR that they can't or should not build
> > > shared libs;
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 00:21 -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> Can anyone explain the difference or need for both of these ?
>
> ports/devel/gconf <-( Should'nt this be the only one needed ? )
> ports/devel/dconf
>
> I just noticed dconf installed on my system.
>
> Both of these have the same WWW:
> > > It turns out that the problem is more general! A lot of ./configure
> > > scripts are detecting in 10-CUR that they can't or should not build
> > > shared libs; the problem is that the OS is detected now as
> >
> > As a temporary workaround, add "WITH_FBSD10_FIX=1" to /etc/make.conf.
>
> port
Am 11/03/11 18:42, schrieb b. f.:
It turns out that the problem is more general! A lot of ./configure
scripts are detecting in 10-CUR that they can't or should not build
shared libs; the problem is that the OS is detected now as
>>>
>>> As a temporary workaround, add "WITH_FBSD10_FIX
On 11/3/11, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Am 11/03/11 18:42, schrieb b. f.:
>So I presume the WITH_FBSD10_FIX flag is set in /etc/make.conf, right?
You can set it in a number of local Makefiles that are automatically
included during a port build. That includes make.conf, and the others
mentioned in por
El día Thursday, November 03, 2011 a las 01:42:50PM -0400, b. f. escribió:
> No, it is not the same. You can either masquerade, by setting UNAME_r
> and OSVERSION, or by editing the headers and scripts that define them;
> or you can use WITH_FBSD10_FIX for ports that define HAS_CONFIGURE
> (which
On Nov 3, 2011, at 8:25 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Thursday, November 03, 2011 a las 01:42:50PM -0400, b. f. escribió:
>
>> No, it is not the same. You can either masquerade, by setting UNAME_r
>> and OSVERSION, or by editing the headers and scripts that define them;
>> or you can use WI
El día Thursday, November 03, 2011 a las 01:42:50PM -0400, b. f. escribió:
> No, it is not the same. You can either masquerade, by setting UNAME_r
> and OSVERSION, or by editing the headers and scripts that define them;
> or you can use WITH_FBSD10_FIX for ports that define HAS_CONFIGURE
> (which
16 matches
Mail list logo
