Just a note to say that recent changes on -CURRENT (r225950, meaning
that it is probably broken on 9.0 after r226067) have broken
audio/cdparanoia, and it should be fixed or marked as BROKEN there. I
haven't filed a PR, or attempted to patch it yet -- I think that it
would be worthwhile to look in
In preparation for 9.0 the ports tree will be in feature freeze
after release candidate 1 (RC2)is released, currently planned for
October 17.
If you have any commits with high impact planned, get them in the tree
before then and if they require an experimental build, have a request
for one in port
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 06:11:13 -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 03:46:22 -0400, b. f. wrote:
> > Just a note to say that recent changes on -CURRENT (r225950, meaning
> > that it is probably broken on 9.0 after r226067) have broken
> > audio/cdparanoia, and it should be fix
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 03:46:22 -0400, b. f. wrote:
> Just a note to say that recent changes on -CURRENT (r225950, meaning
> that it is probably broken on 9.0 after r226067) have broken
> audio/cdparanoia, and it should be fixed or marked as BROKEN there. I
> haven't filed a PR, or attempted to p
Op 06-10-2011 21:39, Doug Barton schreef:
> On 10/06/2011 05:24, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>> So, after the all discussions, security/cfs was silently removed.
>
I plead guilty.
> Right, because the EXPIRATION_DATE arrived and all the reasons for
> removing it were still valid.
>
> I really don't ne
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 08:43:31 + (GMT)
"Thomas Mueller" mentioned:
> > From $PORTSDIR/devel/cross-binutils:
>
> > GNU binutils for cross-target application development.
>
> > Prerequisite for the GCC cross-compiling environment.
>
> > Use TGTARCH switch to select target architecture, and T
> I think that it would be worthwhile to look into moving to 10.2,
> which has a large number of improvements, although suffering
> from some Linuxisms.
My efforts at an update failed due to my own failings :)
So just a ditto on the suggestion to move to 10.2 and
avoiding BROKEN. You may also want
In case anyone wants to take this on, this port fails to install on 10.0
because it uses its own version of libtool. I took a quick look but
there wasn't a solution obvious enough for me. :)
Doug
On 10/07/2011 09:15, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> ume 2011-10-07 16:15:47 UTC
>
> FreeBSD por
lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
> portname: net-mgmt/portmon
> deprecated because: No more public distfiles
I was able to fetch it earlier today:
$ ( cd /usr/ports/net-mgmt/portmon && make fetch-recursive )
===> Fetching all distfiles for portmon-2.0 and dependencies
===> Vulnerability che
On 10/05/2011 15:19, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>> Trying to create a package for lang/chicken today, it fails to build at
>> all with FORCE_MAKE_JOBS, so it needs MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE= true in the
>> Makefile.
>
> True.
Do you mind if I go ahead and add that sooner rather than later?
10 matches
Mail list logo