___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 2011-09-12 01:22, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 09/11/2011 13:35, Warren Block wrote:
>> Let me suggest a reasonable[1] plan:
>
> No. :) No more talking is necessary. Doing is necessary (or not,
> doesn't really matter to me at this point).
>
> I think Chris is right, a reasonable first step is a H
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 14:30:16 +0100
Chris Rees wrote:
> On 10 September 2011 10:46, Alberto Villa wrote:
> > On Saturday 10 September 2011 10:53:54 Chris Rees wrote:
> >> I also don't think this is a terrible idea, but perhaps we could
> >> just put a little section about Resurrecting dead ports
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .)
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsol
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
No matches t
Hello, Ports.
Is here console tool, which shows dependency tree of installed ports
from "required" port to "users"? pkg_tree performs opposite task.
+REQUIRED_BY is flat list, unfortunately.
I need to investigate exact path why this port is installed on my
system :)
--
// Black Lion AKA
On 12/09/2011 17:58, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Ports.
>
> Is here console tool, which shows dependency tree of installed ports
> from "required" port to "users"? pkg_tree performs opposite task.
>
> +REQUIRED_BY is flat list, unfortunately.
>
> I need to investigate exact path why th
Hello, Eric.
You wrote 12 сентября 2011 г., 21:33:58:
> Not aware of a command line tool, but the beta version of the freshports
> website show what ports require the selected port in order to run, which
> what I think you want.
Oh. For gcc45, for example, list is soobig, that command line tool,
Hello, Matthew.
You wrote 12 сентября 2011 г., 22:38:05:
> On 12/09/2011 17:58, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>> Hello, Ports.
>>
>> Is here console tool, which shows dependency tree of installed ports
>> from "required" port to "users"? pkg_tree performs opposite task.
>>
>> +REQUIRED_BY is flat l
Hello,
Since my new update of ports tree :
===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
===> Found saved configuration for git-1.7.4.3
=> git-1.7.6.1.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//.
=> Attempting to fe
On 09/12/2011 12:06, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Eric.
> You wrote 12 сентября 2011 г., 21:33:58:
>
>> Not aware of a command line tool, but the beta version of the freshports
>> website show what ports require the selected port in order to run, which
>> what I think you want.
> Oh. For gcc4
>
> Since my new update of ports tree :
>
> ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
> ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
> ===> Found saved configuration for git-1.7.4.3
> => git-1.7.6.1.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//.
> => Attempting
On 09/12/11 14:29, David Demelier wrote:
Hello,
Since my new update of ports tree :
===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
===> Found saved configuration for git-1.7.4.3
=> git-1.7.6.1.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr
Hello, Doug.
You wrote 12 сентября 2011 г., 23:43:03:
> It's not as easy to represent the data in the way you describe as you
> might think. Something like gcc is going to have multiple entry points
> in a graph, which is really hard to represent in a (sort of)
> 1-dimensional structure like a tre
On 09/12/2011 12:58, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> How could I determine which ports are directly lined with libgcc from
> gcc44? ldd?
Yes, that's really the only answer. I have the following function which
would work:
old_libs ()
{
local file nf;
[ -e ~/old-lib-list ] && unlink ~/old-lib-li
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Is here console tool, which shows dependency tree of installed ports
> from "required" port to "users"? pkg_tree performs opposite task.
>
> +REQUIRED_BY is flat list, unfortunately.
>
> I need to investigate exact path why this port is installed on my
> system :)
Looks like the dependence of pulseaudio on gdbm was missed. The
audio/pulseaudio Makefile needs the following change, and the port should
have its version bumped.
I noticed this when KDE4's kontact stopped working after the gdbm update.
--
Greg Rivers
--- Makefile.old2011-09-12 15:1
Quoth Helmut Schneider on Monday, 12 September 2011:
> Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>
> > Is here console tool, which shows dependency tree of installed ports
> > from "required" port to "users"? pkg_tree performs opposite task.
> >
> > +REQUIRED_BY is flat list, unfortunately.
> >
> > I need to
Dear maintainer of databases/gdbm,
Thank you for committing the latest update of gdbm with a (nowhere to be
found mentioned in UPDATING) shared library bump, which again makes my
very dull FreeBSD installation a little bit more fun to maintain, and
especially - *use*
After all, it's been now runn
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 23:55:56 +0200
Michal Varga articulated:
> So again, thank you for taking your part in ensuring that my days with
> FreeBSD (the remaining few, so to say) won't become too boring. It's
> much appreciated, really.
Seriously now, I thought I was the only one allowed to criticize
2011/9/12 Michal Varga :
> Dear maintainer of databases/gdbm,
>
> Thank you for committing the latest update of gdbm with a (nowhere to be
> found mentioned in UPDATING) shared library bump, which again makes my
> very dull FreeBSD installation a little bit more fun to maintain, and
> especially -
On 2011.09.12. 23:55, Michal Varga wrote:
Dear maintainer of databases/gdbm,
Thank you for committing the latest update of gdbm with a (nowhere to be
found mentioned in UPDATING) shared library bump, which again makes my
very dull FreeBSD installation a little bit more fun to maintain, and
espec
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 07:05:58PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 23:55:56 +0200
> Michal Varga articulated:
>
> > So again, thank you for taking your part in ensuring that my days with
> > FreeBSD (the remaining few, so to say) won't become too boring. It's
> > much appreciated, really
On 09/12/2011 06:09 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 07:05:58PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 23:55:56 +0200
Michal Varga articulated:
So again, thank you for taking your part in ensuring that my days with
FreeBSD (the remaining few, so to say) won't become too boring.
On 09/12/2011 16:46, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> We all make mistakes from time to time. Michal could have pointed out
> the mistake and still been nice about it. I know for myself that when I
> make a mistake like this that I feel bad enough as it is, and I don't
> need anyone rubbing it i
On Sun, 22 May 2011, Doug Barton wrote:
> Will @unexec in pkg-plist do the job?
On Mon, 23 May 2011, Wesley Shields wrote:
> Are these what you are looking for:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/pkg-install.html
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/pkg-dei
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 01:01:17 +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> On 2011.09.12. 23:55, Michal Varga wrote:
> [ Irony ignored. Btw, your Hungarian first name speaks for itself. ;) ]
>
> I did see the notice in the PR and I did grep the tree and I did
> bump lots of ports. I'm also surprised how I did
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 15:26:39 -0500, Greg Rivers wrote:
> Looks like the dependence of pulseaudio on gdbm was missed. The
> audio/pulseaudio Makefile needs the following change, and the port
> should have its version bumped.
>
> I noticed this when KDE4's kontact stopped working after the gdbm
28 matches
Mail list logo
